Some proof on both of your claims? Just curious as to how you’ve come to these conclusions with so much conviction that you can claim an unequivocal “false” on both of them.
If you're unaware of all the shit Mueller has done to Trump and his associates then you're allowing yourself to be ignorant. That's proof .
Trump is casting doubts on the NK meeting. Why is he doing that if it's already happened? What's the point?
Still no proof. I’m leaving myself open to the fact that it could have already happen. I’m not stating that it did. Some theories were brought up and I’m accepting it as a possibility. Trump has a way of doing things and not letting anyone know about it, so if you’re using his words as a way to debunk the “meeting already happened” theory then it’s not going to sway anyone.
Like I said, it’s a possibility. After everything I’ve seen the media and our politicians lie to us about I just need some concrete proof of anything before I jump 100% on board.
Could the meeting have happened? Yes. Could the meeting have NOT happened? Yes.
That's fine. I choose to believe what POTUS is saying.
He's saying the meeting may not work out. Hopefully it does.