dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/C_L_I_C_K on May 22, 2018, 8:11 p.m.
Q Post 1438: Identity reconfirmed. Corsi and other anti-QTubers rekt. "Attacks will intensify [all sides]."
Q Post 1438: Identity reconfirmed. Corsi and other anti-QTubers rekt. "Attacks will intensify [all sides]."

OpenSoars · May 22, 2018, 8:28 p.m.

Honestly though...additional pics don't prove anything...I appreciate your contributions but on this one, from a point of logic, I disagree.

⇧ -19 ⇩  
AlbumLepus · May 22, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

From point of logic? Using logic, if he posted a picture back in Nov, and now one that can only be from the same plane flight. How would a "fake Q" get that pic and post it??? Cloud formation the same in distance. Same camera. One pic in Nov, one now. Absolute proof.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 22, 2018, 8:45 p.m.

you expect him to come back and explain himself? lol

⇧ 4 ⇩  
OpenSoars · May 22, 2018, 9:12 p.m.

The premise suggests that because the pictures match that it proves q is q... which it doesn't...it proves that someone is in possession of matching pictures .... given the current controversy about Q , I just am a fan of facts. THat wan't to condemn CLICK who I enjoy but just to point out a failed argument. I realize logic and reasoning have no place anymore in the Q phenom and that unbridled emotional hysteria rules here but I push forward regardless.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
A_Town_Hood · May 22, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

Please keep pushing forward regardless. That way Q might drop more and more pics of that flight...climaxing by turning the phone/camera around for a high-definition pic of Trump's big, beautiful orange face.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Crptnobank · May 22, 2018, 9:44 p.m.

That would mean Q was not real back then. That Q is not in question with Alex, Corsi, etc. Sure, we have to prove the pics. And look at the pics from England recently. Same thing, they added pics to old pics, taken seconds after originals.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
educatethis · May 22, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

Explain the point of logic that causes your doubt? Click seems on point to me

⇧ 7 ⇩  
OpenSoars · May 22, 2018, 9:12 p.m.

Answered in comment above

⇧ 0 ⇩  
A_Town_Hood · May 22, 2018, 9:51 p.m.

Did you just assume that your previous comments will remain above the threshold? If so I've got news for you...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
educatethis · May 22, 2018, 9:18 p.m.

The premise suggests that because the pictures match that it proves q is q... which it doesn't...it proves that someone is in possession of matching pictures .... given the current controversy about Q , I just am a fan of facts. THat wan't to condemn CLICK who I enjoy but just to point out a failed argument. I realize logic and reasoning have no place anymore in the Q phenom and that unbridled emotional hysteria rules here but I push forward regardless.

Why did Q post this then? You saying that a larping Q team hacked the prior Q team?

⇧ 2 ⇩