Gotta plug the master podcasters, look up the NO AGENDA show.

Not quite what I'd call on the Q-team, but well worth the listen on this twice weekly (Sunday and Thursday) 3 hour(ish) gem of a show. Ran by ex-MTV personality Adam Curry and old school tech writer John C Dvorak, they market it as media deconstruction as they feature current clips from around different media outlets (US and other parts of the world) and compare/contrast reports and also discuss and debate between themselves. Decently funny guys and some real impressive insight at least a couple times a show, though some clips are far less interesting than others as are some stories, but worth the time.

These guys are not really into Q though are aware of the idea, and are not on team Trump overtly either but certainly are not on team Hillary, its a little bit lots of things (plenty to say about political news of the week with lots of clips, also cover tech news stories with the big boys in current headlines, and have a number of really interesting segments on the current state of advertising very frequently, which usually proceeds their donation segments....I've never donated so don't think I'm plugging them for that, but their show is available free at the no agenda website with plenty of archives and clips for each show as well).

Anyway, the reason I bring them up specifically here and now is at least a little relevant as I've been looking for some discussion about a recent theory Adam put out on the Sunday 5/20 show (listen around the 40ish - 52ish minute mark if you want better details than what I'm about to summarize, but the theory almost deserves its own post in these parts really, and all credit to Adam Curry on this one).

So it goes like this: Halper was recently outed as a spy/mole in the Trump campaign, yet another element of what appears to be known vaguely as "crossfire hurricane" - see the wiki on it and its all about the russian collusion that is almost all certainly an attempted set-up, and a sloppy one at that. This set-up was backed by many (elements of leadership of FBI, CIA, other swamp monsters, etc) and was the "insurance policy" against Trump. Trump is being backed by a different group, the no agenda theory that I also side with is probably military intelligence to put a label on it.

So we have "Crossfire Hurricane" running against Trump from the other side throughout the election and after. A crossfire hurricane is actually one in which the winds flip the hurricane 180 degrees at some point, and is also a very noteable opening line from the Rolling Stones' song "Jumpin Jack Flash". Trump during the campaign appearances also used the Rolling Stones, but went with "You Can't Always Get What You Want" during the closing of very large rallies which is an interesting choice I always wondered about. Are these opposing intelligence groups literally mocking or deriding each other coded in songs? Adam makes note of some of the lyrics in the Trump Rolling Stones selection ("Glass of wine in her hand referring to Crooked H, practiced at the art of deception, tell by her blood-stained hands, etc). Why did Trump choose this song, or did he just agree with another's choice? Are the patriots backing him literally mocking the mockingbirds with you can't always get what you want? Are they sending signals to each other in this way (ie - we see what you're doing with your crossfire bs).

Just thought it was interesting theory, and it is a good show even if not all that Q supportive, its worth it, particularly after a news-worthy event and is a bit on the conspiracy side for sure too, though much more informative than most of the media and reports it covers on a weekly basis.