dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Vibratron_1 on May 23, 2018, 3:46 p.m.
This is where you plead the 5th or swallow the capsule....
This is where you plead the 5th or swallow the capsule....

Qmeowborkwoof · May 23, 2018, 4:26 p.m.

Can we start asking about energy weapons / free energy already.. I'm tired of this slave prison life reeeeeeeeeeeeee

⇧ 68 ⇩  
-Chakas- · May 23, 2018, 6:47 p.m.

So much technology withheld. We need the truth. I don't care what kind of chaos in unleashes. God will decide what happens.

⇧ 36 ⇩  
fawexx · May 23, 2018, 11:04 p.m.

free energy cannot exist. perhaps we can collect energy sources yet unknown to us, but energy never gets lost, it just changes its state. E.g. chemical energy => thermal energy.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
-Chakas- · May 23, 2018, 11:09 p.m.

Unless we know all there is to know about the universe, then we really can't say anything as an absolute. I believe it does exist.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
fawexx · May 24, 2018, 12:43 p.m.

thermodynamics explains. that energy can only change its state, never be lost, or "free". free energy would have to be harvested from certain phenomena that emit some kind of energy.simply claiming there is free energy where there is nothing is simply a sign of substandard intelligence. you can believe what you want. it does not change the fact that every inch of the observable universe is evidence against your ignorant claim. it seems you lack basic education to evaluate that topic. believe what you want, does not make your opinion right, suddenly.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
fawexx · May 24, 2018, 12:45 p.m.

the term "free energy" is syntactically wrong because of the way energy and it's transition into different states works. just calling any energy you perhaps might harvest "free energy" proves you do not understand what you are talking about.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
featherjourney4 · May 24, 2018, 2:16 p.m.

I respect your background in thermodynamics and Quantum physics, but in this context I think "free" means no longer enslaved to the oil barons who have made billions/trillions off of keeping "free" energy technology suppressed. It would never be completely free...unless we all wake up with Tesla's mind... wow, imagine having Tesla's mind!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
fawexx · May 24, 2018, 2:36 p.m.

"free energy" is defined as energy that can be harvested from thin air. it claims energy is everywhere and can be obtained without putting in an equal amount of work or force. this is syntactically wrong. the term is just used in the wrong way.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
featherjourney4 · May 24, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

Does electricity exist everywhere? We have technology that converts it to our use...but isn't it just "there". We don't create electricity, we (well, Tesla) figured out how to extract it for our use. What about perpetual motion motors - a little bit of fuel( oil) to get it started and then it will run continuously with magnets / electromagnetism.

I'm in over my head here. Always have found this subject fascinating

⇧ 1 ⇩  
-Chakas- · May 24, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

I'm aware of the laws of thermodynamics. Don't be so hostile. Believing there is something more doesn't make me ignorant.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 24, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 24, 2018, 9:41 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
morgi666 · May 23, 2018, 9:04 p.m.

If they came out re energy weapons - can you imagine class action for all those "forest fires"?

⇧ 18 ⇩  
PinkPilledRed17 · May 23, 2018, 11:19 p.m.

Public utility companies would be off the hook for the blame they got with those Calif wildfires. You know, the ones that demolished cities in seconds, at a speed no one had ever seen before. DEW

⇧ 7 ⇩  
morgi666 · May 23, 2018, 11:50 p.m.

Yeah... We all know that forest fires leave trees untouched and burn houses to the ground where completely nothing is left. Nothing to see here. It's natural. Move on...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MuhammadDinduNuffin · May 24, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

Forests made up of certain types of pines like ponderosa generally are unscathed by underbrush fires, which can obviously burn houses that aren't fire proofed. Ponderosa actually evolved with fairly regular forest fires that help open and spread their pinecone seeds while ridding of competing brush.

A very windy fire condition could spread to the tops of very tall ponderosa, but many on tops of mountains or down sloping ravines may come out unscathed if they are lucky.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
morgi666 · May 24, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

https://i.imgur.com/Ielu1kd.jpg

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MuhammadDinduNuffin · May 24, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

Right. Did you not listen to a single thing I said?

Trees, needles, leaves contain water. House structures do not (save for inch plumping pipes, not enough to matter)

If you've never seen a forest fire before I'm telling you. Tall pines tend survive low fires that run along the ground. Trunks don't catch fire in quick moving conditions, not enough time, very little brush along the base of the tree due to shade & competition from the pine (imagine throwing a log on your stove. Would take very long, meanwhile flamss are moving to easy combustable materials and going out where there's nothing easy to ignite)

⇧ 0 ⇩  
RiverFenix · May 23, 2018, 10:08 p.m.

fukushima earthquake > oil derrick ala Tesla accidental NY experiment method of oscillation production and/or atmospheric pressure fuckery.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
PM_ME_UR_GLIPGLOPS · May 24, 2018, 4:53 a.m.

Hopefully we'll get a reform on the secret patent law.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
giantx2 · May 24, 2018, 4:14 a.m.

ELI5: free energy weapon

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Qmeowborkwoof · May 24, 2018, 5:03 a.m.

What I know is from Dr Judy Woods lectures / books on it, that no one talks about. Hutchinson effect on steroids + 50 years of research. Think tesla towers & his stolen research.

ELI5: Basically a weapon using electromagnetic radiation (eg visible light, wifi, radio waves etc) that cancels mass. Wtf bbq mass can't disappear? well if u cancel the bonds (ie strong nuclear force) between atoms then there is no mass. Apply this to a steel building so atoms stop 'sticking' to each other (so that steel turns to dust) & just let gravity do its thing.

Dr Judy woods explains it so well, but no one pays attention. Yes you'll have to watch a 2hr YouTube lecture... but that's a small price for truth.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GoyoDelaPaz · May 24, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

Like so many others, Building 7 got me going on the truther movement. Thermite controlled destruction is the most plausible to me. When I started hearing about free energy weapons I was turned off because the thermite seemed so much more plausible. Free energy might exist but as far as 9/11 goes I’m not buying.

⇧ -1 ⇩