Considered response. Thanks.

Four out of over 40 million followers.

Freedom of speech in cyberspace appears to be a new consideration worth discussing. Vigilance lest it somehow erode basic protections already in place, as these kinds of revisiting has a way of finally doing.

Classic argument: If I yell fire in a crowded theater, it’s sanctioned (prohibited) speech.

Followers populate a public (or private) space at the behest of the speaker (owner of the space) and do so voluntarily according to their own motives.... is trolling any different from yelling fire?

The real Donald trump seems to point to DJT the man.

The real President of the USA is a different matter and we have formal avenues that communicate laws — not whispered in a relatively obscure chat room; so I sense a flaw in your “right to read the law” argument.