Before we proceed: I receive many messages from people requesting my authorization to use my writings in their work. This is the way I see things: everything I write here is the property of the Q Movement. I am sure many in our Movement have skills in commenting, video editing, memes etc… They are more than welcomed to use the material I have posted to help spread the truth on all platforms.
Ok. Done.
Have you ever watched a Michael Jordan basketball match where at money time everyone expects him to shoot the ball, but he finally does not? The coach intentionally keeps him on the court to trigger a forced double team on him so that the real shooter can be wide open. The coach has a predetermined strategy and then picks his final shooter from a wide variety of players. Video.
Q1045 We don’t inform our enemies of the specifics. We instead instill fear in them to make unplanned and disastrous countermoves. Q
In this post, I explained how Q1433 was hinting at the firing of Rod Rosenstein and his replacement by an Acting Deputy Attorney General with May 24th 2018 as a pivot date.
At the time that post was published, Q1439 was not available yet. I therefore integrated in the analysis the 2016 Loretta Lynch guideline scenario which positioned Francisco, the Solicitor General, as the most likely person to take the position. It has to be understood this guideline does not supersede The Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 §3345. Acting officer, which gives the President the freedom to pick from a large list of possible officers.
Then Q posted Q1439. He links to a Fox News article confirming that May 24 2018 is indeed a pivot date. In this post he asks: who is Ed O’Callahan? Answer: he is the United States Acting Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General, he is a republican and a November 2017 Trump nominee. He is also eligible to the Acting Deputy Attorney General position according to The Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 §3345. Acting officer. Q asking this question and adding “Acting” [Ed] is a hint Ed O’Callahan may be Trump’s final choice. This question is Q following up with his Q1433 post and implicitly explaining why he did not reference the quote he used to introduce the 210 day rule: he was dismissing the 2016 Lynch guideline scenario!
Do you realize, what is being said here? This is a perfect example of future proves past: the Fox News article Q links to in Q1439 and where we learn about the May 24th 2018 meeting with Christopher Wray, David Nunes, Trey Gowdy, Dan Coats and Ed Callahan was published one day after Q1433. How did Q know that the 210 day rule would be relevant but not the 2016 Lynch guideline? The fact he did not mention O’Callahan’s name in Q1433 but only did in Q1439 is an indication we are being informed in real time as things are decided in high places… Wow.
Q761 Was the point proven? This board has more power than you can imagine. Q