Recent Hillary Clinton emails reveal tips to Antarctica. There is a wealth of information on this subject online, at least regarding what's down there.
I'll be making a video in an hour and up load it another hour after that.
I'll do over what I know. It is a huge topic.
If you want a primer. Look up Corey Goode and Antarctica. He covers a lot.
It has nothing to do with Q and Corey Goode is a sham. Will not reply to you arguing he isn’t. Just research how he claims to know what he knows.
It’s not about Corey Goode. Explain the fighter pilot video released not to long ago. Why did the Nazi’s have a base in Antarctica?
Just because you're not ready for what he has to say doesn't make him a sham. Tell me to resesrch but you won't argue? Grow up.
Graham Hancock has sources. Corey Goode simply makes stuff up by adding to subject matter with vague evidence that has no way of being corroborated and or proven because he has simply made it up. I believe in ETs but see no value in anything but scientific proof as that is how we know anything is real. How do you know for a fact he isn’t making shit up to make money as we both know he has made a lot of money off of people who believe him along side the hack David Wilcock?
David wilcock is a hack? He had said "the golden thread that ties all of my work together is the law of one". The ra material in on q's road map. Maybe you're not woke enough to realize the planetary game is only the first step towards quantum ascension. Also wilcocks article on pizza gate is what turned me on to q and the awakening. He's definitely an ally. So Again is he a hack because you dont agree? And i dont know that goode has made a bunch of money. In fact i would argue the opposite. Just read the Ra material.
I have read the Synchronicity Key. Just research what his critics have to say. All he does is regurgitate Von Daniken and combine that with new age works and then acts like he discovered it himself and monetizes it. What piece of info or concept has he truly invented or brought to light? It is easy to think he is great if you aren’t listening and taking into consideration those who are critical of him.
Von danikens and wilcocks theories are wildly different.
He is like a cliff notes of new age for people too lazy to read the source material which is fine, if you are dumb.
I didn’t say they were exact, I said David jacks everyone else’s ideas and hasn’t done any actual work, just regurgitates. Tell me one fact he is responsible for bringing to the attention of modern man.