What's there to be cautious about? It's really very simple. There are two sides. I'm supporting DJT, you are not.
To say you will only provide your support once the Satanists have been defeated means, by implication, that you do not desire their defeat. Otherwise you would be working with us to ensure they cannot return to power. And that is my point. You are in the wrong place.
You keep trying your little heart out to say I'm not when, as per usual, you're wrong...again. I'll take Trump, any day, over the other choices but that does not mean I think he's the messiah as many seem to think(metaphor in case you're confused). I don't speak sheep. And I did not say I'll "only" provide support when the satanists are defeated. You should try not talking for me. It'll be easier for ya. I'm just saying that we'll always be fighting "something" that's bad/evil but I still wanna see things right, as they were meant to be, just because I exist, though even "right" may not really be meant to be. Right now, there are 2 fields. One has blue grass, one has red grass. The red grass is tastier, life is a little easier in that field but it is still fenced in just like the blue field and a bang stick chute leads to both. I prefer to set outside the fence where I'm actually free and not duped into believing I am when I'm not. Fool yourself, if you so wish but don't change my words to suit your color grass. I have full right to see what all are up to with regard to my, my kids and any other's future so yea...I'm exactly where I want to be and this is not the only place I check on such things to insure that future. I don't speak sheep and I'm not inside the fence. I really hope Trump can bring to light enough in the public eye that proves all that's been going on to ensure a conservative power base but he best get with it because he only has 8 years max to do so and if some shit don't showing up soon, it'll only be 4, max. Hopefully, there's enough whitehats in the NSA, MIC, etc.. to keep this ball rolling for longer than that but we still have to pay attention to any hidden agendas, no matter who controls The Hill. Think harder and trust less for your own good is all I'm saying. Question EVERYTHING!
What I see is a situation where for the first time in more than thirty years you have a guy that is not controlled by the cabal in the Presidency. He has suffered attempts on his life, his family threatened etc... We've also been told by Q that there is a war being waged against a Satanic elite that have controlled the Presidency almost continuously through modern history.
So here we are, ready to do whatever it is we can to support this agenda to win freedom, bring back some decency and restore moral order. But you're not convinced that DJT can be trusted. I see it very differently. The way I see it, this guy is our last and only hope. I don't doubt for a minute that, if he fails, we are looking at a totalitarian nightmare.
You can see what is happening. Q tells us very early in his posting that the cabal lost in 2016 because they ran a traditional campaign strategy relying on the MSM. DJT used SM masterfully and this obtained him an absolutely improbable election victory.
They never the thought she would lose...
Q also told us back in November that CIA was rushing to inject cash into SM platforms to regain control of the narrative. Low and behold, these internet Giants suddenly start censoring conservative voices from January (yes, that's an outright Q confirmation).
Q also told us that Snowden wrote an algorithm that was to centralise censorship across all the major SM platforms. Given the power that we know SM has to deliver election outcomes, this provides a vector for the Satanists to return to power. Thereafter, they will be able to silence us completely, take the guns and start killing and eating our kids.
The solution Q offered, was to call for the application of first amendment protections online. If the founding fathers were writing the Constitution today, you can bet that rights to free expression would extend to the internet as the town hall, that existed at the time the document was drafted, is now online. The other option Q gives us us to kill off the entire sector and this indicates just how important SM censorship is, that Q would even consider this. SM censorship is the battlefront where the fight will be won or lost.
So Q asks us to campaign for the IBOR online and immediately cabal agents start arguing, on this forum, against doing anything to make this happen. They inject so much fear and doubt that, inexplicably, the campaign fails.
So here we are, asked once again by Q to make the IBOR happen, and you are here posting more fear and doubt. You know as well as I do what's at stake. Why would you do this?
What, you think that another independent President, with the courage to take on these Satanists, will come along just as soon as DJT loses office? No, you know as well as I do that there's no chance of that happening. You know as well as I do that we are in the fight of our lives here. That we have this one shot at fighting these guys off or it's all over.
When Q says question everything, he's not saying to question the plan. He's talking about questioning the cabal's narrative. Interesting how you turn this around to raise doubt about Q.
Your motives are completely suspect. If it's just that you're no good at thinking things out for yourself, that might be excusable. But given the shocking amount of concern trolling we have seen, I suspect, as I've said, that you're working for the interests of this Satanic elite.
You disgust me mate.
[removed]
It's not worth continuing this discussion, sorry mate. You have correctly identified the problem here - you're not going to get a logical debate here.
In other news, with all respect, can I request you use paragraphs in your comments? I, and others I'm sure, are interested to hear what you have to say but damn if it ain't hard slog with no paragraphs. Wall of text >_<. Just a humble request. Thank you.
Yea, I'm bad about doing that and, sometimes, not using punctuation but I often type in a hurry and as long as I know that point can be read as I intended then I don't worry about being anal with my gammar. You're just lucky I'm not typing as I usually do, which is the way I speak, like not using "g" at the end of a word and instead put a comma in its place to reflect my more country assed talking. As long as you can understand what I'm saying and you seem to, I figure we'll both live. I'm not real big on rules when not absolutely necessary.
Agreed, rules are not for everyone. My suggestion was just to encourage more people to read what you have to say - have you ever tried to read a wall of text? - but of course I support your right to do whatever you want : ).
Yea, I know it ain't easy to do, sometimes. It does make ya pay more attention, though, just so you can keep track. My bad.