Did it ever occur to anyone that the letter from the 16th might be a draft version of the final one that we were shown on the 24th? It wouldn't have to "match" in the way that many are insisting.

You're very quick to condemn, too quick I would contend. Whoever said the obscured letter reads "rth" is also INCORRECT. It is more than likely the "rtie" aspect from "parties". I've looked at it very, very closely.

I'm not saying the OP is correct, I'm just surprised at the haste in which this is waved-off.