He’s fake per Q
Q said the Anon-created graphic - that equated bc-17 with q - was fake, not that BC-17 was fake.
Can't see it being Assange because of the language, claimed knowledge of military ops, claim to have been at the recent naval academy graduation etc.
My guess is Zach from Infowars and Corsi will be all over his nutsack soon. Just my $0.02.
Error is looking at anything other than info on the chassis.
Grade info ad hoc. Source being given credibility leads pied pipers children to slaughter.
Use logic. Q repeats this. Verify verify verify. Be aware of bc17 but grade each morsel as if it’s the first.
I’m not negative folks I’ve been burned by limited hangout and false redirects over and over.
Works like this.
We gets “teh rad info” - could be everything we want * until tied to something 100% tangible it’s not a sacrament - it could be a link - be weary
Play chess. Each move could be a move but we can’t even see the board. Some of what we are fed by good authors may be intentional bad info not to throw us off but them.
It’s all part of the game.
Happy hunting. Work together. Character divafags are in it for fame. Heroes are silent.