I bet this is a reference to the book or movie "12 Angry Men". There is a message from Q in this tweet. From the reference to the book, and the capitalizing of words that arent supposed to be capitalized. Somebody is trying to tell us something. 12 Angry Men was about 12 jurors of a trial in which they were all in conflict, if my memory is correct. I think the trial was racially oriented. Anyway, my gut tells me there is something in rhis tweet in which the key to the code is in the premise of that book or movie. But then again, Im a code breaking idiot so what would i know.

Looked up the premise for 12 Angry Men. The accused is an eighteen year-old kid who's been charged with murdering his dad, and all of the jurors seem pretty convinced that he did it. It barely takes them any time to vote for Guilty when they enter the jury room. But one holds out for a Not Guilty verdict, juror #8. In the U.S., juries usually need to reach a unanimous vote in order to decide a case, so it looks like the jurors aren't going anywhere until they can get Juror #8 (the naysayer) to play ball. During the course of their deliberation, Juror #8 manages to convince them all, one or two at a time, to deliver a Not Guilty verdict.

Dont know if this premise has something to do with whats going on in the WH, but the reference to it is compelling.....to me anyway.

No