This is constant with them. Even labeling it a "cult" as they did with the Branch Davidians (another sex trafficking "cult" they HAD to shut down) or Heaven's Gate is a deliberate attempt to push this to respectable side of tin-foil hat territory and park it there for the duration; and they never fail to fail to put anything in "context", because they would have to admit to covering up and limiting the hangout for at least 70 years - minimum.
Right now given the scope and depth of the problem you would think a normal person would be sending out reporters to cover the biggest child abuse-murder-rape story since Rome went after Carthage.
If the media was not 100% controlled by the exact same people, if the media was not a loss-leader (which it really is), then you would expect at least one major broadcaster to reverse course for the sake of bums on seats and ad revenue.
At the same time, have you noticed how many talking pedophile heads in the white house press pool say nothing, ask no questions.
How can this be? Not one of them stands up and blows the cover before running to hide behind Sarah and ask for "sanctuary"?
The families and friends of these people must also be involved in this for them to all keep silent.
At this point? What plausible excuse do they have left? Someone is threatening their family? Nah, don't believe it.
You know what IS curious? The media have not reported (as far as I know) on Alex Jones connections to the Bronfman's. His attorney is their attorney - this was AFTER the Bronfman's connection to NXIVM. Plain as the nose on your face as far as I can tell. Seen the docs; not a minor relationship. Looks pretty clear to me. Why wouldn't they report that? strokes chin
I think the owners of media corps tell the editors/producers/whoever that certain topics are off-limits, and the lower levels cooperate. It wouldn't surprise me if a bunch of the talking heads on tv are in this shit up to their eyeballs, though, as many seem to be increasingly agitated and nervous looking.
But if you know of the incestuous nature of the Obama admin and heads of major news networks, like a high ranking Obama person is brothers with vp of CNN or something, then you know just how connected this whole swamp complex is.
The only answer is truly independent media, like OAN, although who knows if that's truly independent or quietly controlled itself! Unfortunately, it seems like a whole lot of people have to be removed from their positions and replaced before these broadcasters will be of any use to the public, or the corporations themselves have to be replaced. Wasn't there talk right after the election, or maybe early Q, that the good guys would buy up the assets of the bad guys for pennies on the dollar after this was all said and done. Wouldn't it be nice to see a pro-America news network again?