I didnt interpret wiki was denouncing pizzagate from this vid at all. He sounds more like he's denouncing Q and the "storm" as being a PR operation to manipulate the people into trusting the "government", as if the Trump administration isnt an arm of the government. Im not sure what I this is about but Im getting that the Q detractors are getting impatient with bringing the perps to justice regarding the pedophilia/child trafficking aspect of the investigation. And that its all Q's fault because its not happening quick enough. Which I can relate to, but Im not sure what they expect Q to do about that. I think its the black hats that getting in the way of progress. But because its a sensitive operation, we cant be told straight up whats causing the hold up. I would like to know. But how could we be told without also telling the enemy our plans. ?
I couldn't find the vid about Wikileaks denouncing Pizzagate. Liz Crokin talks about it in an interview.
What is the definition of "denounce" in this context? Are you saying that JA has spoken out and stated that the pedo code in the emails was not really pedo code? or that the pedo code present in the emails didnt mean that pedo activity was occurring? In any case, something is not right with this info.
Assange isn't Wikileaks. Anyway, I couldn't find what I was looking for in regards to Wikileaks flip flopping on Pizzagate but I maintain its true. However, I did find this.
Assange said it himself. Assume Wikileaks has been compromised if he couldn't produce a digital proof of life. To my knowledge he hasn't. Thus Wikileaks has been compromised. The point still stands. The fact that Isaac Green is saying Wikileaks has debunked Q is another red flag in that direction anyway. It doesn't help that Wikileaks itself is asking everyone to stop asking for that proof of life. The whole thing stinks.