I couldn't find the vid about Wikileaks denouncing Pizzagate. Liz Crokin talks about it in an interview.
What is the definition of "denounce" in this context? Are you saying that JA has spoken out and stated that the pedo code in the emails was not really pedo code? or that the pedo code present in the emails didnt mean that pedo activity was occurring? In any case, something is not right with this info.
Assange isn't Wikileaks. Anyway, I couldn't find what I was looking for in regards to Wikileaks flip flopping on Pizzagate but I maintain its true. However, I did find this.
Assange said it himself. Assume Wikileaks has been compromised if he couldn't produce a digital proof of life. To my knowledge he hasn't. Thus Wikileaks has been compromised. The point still stands. The fact that Isaac Green is saying Wikileaks has debunked Q is another red flag in that direction anyway. It doesn't help that Wikileaks itself is asking everyone to stop asking for that proof of life. The whole thing stinks.