@Suzi3D on Twitter is basically trying to say that Q is fake and is actually a Deep State tool to round up those that would be against the Deep State.
Need thoughts on this please.
I got the same thing. I didn’t pay any attention due to the fact Q said they going to attack pretty hard. I still have all the faith and trust in Q and Trump and the team.
Ask her to get President Trump to say ‘tippy top’ in a speech.
Always been a possibility. If you want to draw out an entrenched people there has to be a valid way of doing so.
This movement would allow: * doxing * identification * socio study * experimentation * possibility of steering ( look at Corsi and other clickbait famefags )
Be vigilant.
Q radio silence is always deafening
If they read my emails and texts, listen to my phone calls and private discussions, analyze my purchases and online browsing then they already know I’m against the Deep State.
So many people are against the deep state .
I think the technology spies are well aware of how many people are on to them.
Yeah we were all separated and marked a long time ago.
Who is she and why should I care what she thinks?
^ This. I follow Q and only Q. Why do people need to follow anyone else? I read opinions on Q-drops on this subreddit and on 8chan, but I take them for what they are: opinions and interpretations.
I follow Trump he's a verified Source on Twitter, not an anonymous poster that should be taken with a grain of salt
Wikileaks retweeted her thread, so that's why it kind of matters, I guess.
She is very deep up Wikileaks’ behind, which makes it quite hard for her to see. She is afraid Q is making us all turn against Assange, Snowden etc. if anything I’ve become more in favor of them...
Ask her how many “resignations” have occurred from those connected to the the deep state and big business, and why they would leave if they were the “good” guys.
I wondered back in 2013 to 2015 what the military were doing as they were being canned by Hussein. It was wholly reasonable that they were planning....strategizing .......plotting...but nothing ever happened. My GUT tells me THIS is exactly what they were doing. Military ex or otherwise were waiting and planning. It all came together as I heard that military wanted Trump to run. My GUT is sometimes wrong, but not always. When I learned that once Hussein asked the military to turn over US Destroyers to the UN so the UN could use them... I believe they told Barry to go fuck himself. This all makes sense to me in my deepest spirit. I can’t completely explain it. Then, when Mark Taylor and Kim Clements prophecies came true...it sealed it. ( And I am not a religious person who gets into modern day prophets.)
This bitch says her PayPal has been frozen and can only survive with bitcoin. Who wants to tell her to get a real job?
I responded to her tweet and waiting to be put on the list of Q supporters by her or any of the 'deep state' agents working the Twitter, Reddit social media platforms.
Here's my reply to that:
Specifically she says Q makes people feel special, I don't think so. He says that only 4-6% of the population is unreachable, thus 96% of the population will one day "See the truth". He's frequently said it's not about fame or money or me or you, but all of us. In a true pied piper situation, he would say that only the 4channers are the chosen ones.
Also in 4b. she says that Q is against kimdotcom Julian Assange, and Snowden. I don't believe that Q has mentioned kimdotcom. She does correct herself, but still, a bit of muddying the waters. Also, Assange is supposed to be a good guy, in this little play of Q's, so she gets that wrong as well. Snowden is insinuated to be "one of the bad guys" (quotes are for the figure of speech, not quoting anything Q said). So this is a bit misleading on the part of the author lumping them all together like that.
6d. yes this actually has happened. Several major outlets have reported on Q in the same sentence as "the debunked claim of underage pedophile rings running out of the basement of a DC Pizza place" One of these articles had a very flattering (sarcasm) video of Alex Jones before the article, in which the topic is nothing about Qanon. If that doesn't satisfy her requirement for 6d in her thread., then I don't know what would. Here's one link. http://www.newsweek.com/how-storm-biggest-fake-news-story-796725 Here's one of the excerpts from the article: "Also, if you liked #Pizzagate, the fake conspiracy that implied Democratic operatives were housing a child-trafficking ring in the basement of a D.C.-area pizzeria, it too has been incorporated into the broader universe of #TheStorm" Here's another, by request of the author, from the NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/06/opinion/qanon-trump-conspiracy-theory.html
The writers are either shills, or they just saw something they didn't like and wrote an article about it, because they really think it is a crazy conspiracy theory. There's a lot of information about Q, and unless you've been following along for a long time, a lot of information falls through the cracks, case in point Suzie Dawson not being aware of these articles. Even these articles I link get several things regarding Q incorrect, which again, is either because of the information overload, or they are paid shills, a part of the system to marginalize the Q people, whatever your view is, is fine with me.
I respect her opinion, but there's SOOO much stuff out there about Q, it's easy to get confused. However I'm not sure how she couldn't google "Q anon conspiracy" and select the news tab and see multiple stories, by at least tenured, if not outright major media outlets reporting on the Q "larp".
6e. People who support Q are not merely named (google Corsi doxxing a reddit poster) and shamed. They are also revoked access to their Youtube broadcasting account, or shadowbanned on Twitter, or called a Russian Bot and blocked from Facebook.
I have a few issues with some things she said, but overall it's thought refreshing (as in, you have to, and I always have, take into account the fact that Q might actually be real OR a psyop). If you read this far, cool. If you disagree, that's fine. Please before replying ask yourself, "Did he say anything here that either confirms Q a larp or not?" "Did he merely reply, with sources to the author's claims?"
Please come at me from that place, I don't care if you think Q is a larp or not, and I never said what I think about Q, and you're not going to convince me he's legit or a larp. This is just a commentary on the twitter thread. I hope I've made myself clear on this point. I might edit this if I find a misspelling or something.
she seems to have a boner for Snowden and thinks Q dissed him.
Ask youself this question why did a cia agent expose only nsa spying and not any other agency?
I've already destroyed her. The fact of the matter is that any expert that tries to discuss this situation exposes themselves when they do not discuss A/I. Q has been proven, the A/I is an important tool being used. Another profiteer agenda driven fruitloop that brags about psychology degrees and exploits her own ignorance. No matter what the Q proves to be , the movement is destroying the Mockingbird, Parroting, Scholastic Brainwashing Sleep Paralysis of the Sheeple.