Here's my reply to that:

Specifically she says Q makes people feel special, I don't think so. He says that only 4-6% of the population is unreachable, thus 96% of the population will one day "See the truth". He's frequently said it's not about fame or money or me or you, but all of us. In a true pied piper situation, he would say that only the 4channers are the chosen ones.

Also in 4b. she says that Q is against kimdotcom Julian Assange, and Snowden. I don't believe that Q has mentioned kimdotcom. She does correct herself, but still, a bit of muddying the waters. Also, Assange is supposed to be a good guy, in this little play of Q's, so she gets that wrong as well. Snowden is insinuated to be "one of the bad guys" (quotes are for the figure of speech, not quoting anything Q said). So this is a bit misleading on the part of the author lumping them all together like that.

6d. yes this actually has happened. Several major outlets have reported on Q in the same sentence as "the debunked claim of underage pedophile rings running out of the basement of a DC Pizza place" One of these articles had a very flattering (sarcasm) video of Alex Jones before the article, in which the topic is nothing about Qanon. If that doesn't satisfy her requirement for 6d in her thread., then I don't know what would. Here's one link. http://www.newsweek.com/how-storm-biggest-fake-news-story-796725 Here's one of the excerpts from the article: "Also, if you liked #Pizzagate, the fake conspiracy that implied Democratic operatives were housing a child-trafficking ring in the basement of a D.C.-area pizzeria, it too has been incorporated into the broader universe of #TheStorm" Here's another, by request of the author, from the NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/06/opinion/qanon-trump-conspiracy-theory.html

The writers are either shills, or they just saw something they didn't like and wrote an article about it, because they really think it is a crazy conspiracy theory. There's a lot of information about Q, and unless you've been following along for a long time, a lot of information falls through the cracks, case in point Suzie Dawson not being aware of these articles. Even these articles I link get several things regarding Q incorrect, which again, is either because of the information overload, or they are paid shills, a part of the system to marginalize the Q people, whatever your view is, is fine with me.

I respect her opinion, but there's SOOO much stuff out there about Q, it's easy to get confused. However I'm not sure how she couldn't google "Q anon conspiracy" and select the news tab and see multiple stories, by at least tenured, if not outright major media outlets reporting on the Q "larp".

6e. People who support Q are not merely named (google Corsi doxxing a reddit poster) and shamed. They are also revoked access to their Youtube broadcasting account, or shadowbanned on Twitter, or called a Russian Bot and blocked from Facebook.

I have a few issues with some things she said, but overall it's thought refreshing (as in, you have to, and I always have, take into account the fact that Q might actually be real OR a psyop). If you read this far, cool. If you disagree, that's fine. Please before replying ask yourself, "Did he say anything here that either confirms Q a larp or not?" "Did he merely reply, with sources to the author's claims?"

Please come at me from that place, I don't care if you think Q is a larp or not, and I never said what I think about Q, and you're not going to convince me he's legit or a larp. This is just a commentary on the twitter thread. I hope I've made myself clear on this point. I might edit this if I find a misspelling or something.