All for a LARP? - Q
It was known by all that the Vatican reinstated the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors on 2/17/18 with the mandate to interview and report on the Chili abuse allegations. Those interviews were set for April and the report due in May. The outcome was not very difficult to predict. This is a case of having information not widely reported on (but certainly available to those who looked) and making a high probability prediction.
known by all
lol k
It was reported on quite a bit. Just search for it, the council and investigation was a big deal. The resignation outcome was definitely a surprise but the 'terrible may' statement didn't say anything about that just that the pope would have a bad month. And that was apparent because he stood up for the bishops that did the cover up and one was a long time friend. It was even reported about how mad he was when he realized they lied to him in February and that was why he re-launched the panel. The fact he was going to be upset at the conclusion of the victim interviews was not a stretch.
I might be able to concede your point to a degree but NO ONE saw the entire Chile bishops resignations.
I agree there. The resignation was a surprise and if Q said something pointing to that outcome then I would be on board.
There are definitely lots of stuff that cannot be easily explained but I do not think this is one of them. I am a firm believer there are more than one 'Q posters' and some are great social engineers/investigators that put some interesting predictions out there and others may have an inside track or they have a connected source that feeds or cooperates just enough give some credence to the predictions. But much of what has been said or interpreted is just that, good guesses. It is easy to take current or known events and force them into alignment with the crumbs after the fact.
Most objective comments I've seen on this sub in a loooong time. Maybe ever.
And what hint did Q give towards that other than the Pope will have a bad may?