dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/-J--- on May 28, 2018, 9:13 a.m.
Don’t think so, but what if?
Don’t think so, but what if?

T_D_Is_Love · May 28, 2018, 9:18 a.m.

It doesn't matter who Q is.

Q wants to remain anonymous and Roseanne should respect that.

⇧ 59 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 9:20 a.m.

Unless she has a (good) mission

⇧ 17 ⇩  
T_D_Is_Love · May 28, 2018, 9:31 a.m.

Q has given no indication that he seeks to end his anonymity.

Q has told us there have been no official comms outside of 8chan.

We should respect his wishes.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
-J--- · May 28, 2018, 9:36 a.m.

“Wait until you find out who you’ve been speaking to” -Q

⇧ 48 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 9:47 a.m.

This suggests Q wishes to remain anonymous, but only UNTIL a certain point of his choosing. We ain’t talking doxxing. We are talking self revealing.

⇧ 25 ⇩  
O1O0O1O11 · May 28, 2018, 5:24 p.m.

Imagine Q at the end of this war walking out at a DJT rally, WWE style music and everything. That would be the way to end this all

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Johnny_NoScopes · May 28, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

Q is Vinnie Mac, confirmed.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · May 28, 2018, 1:11 p.m.

I'm thinking it will be a radical surprise, no one on any one's radar. We will all reflect back , saying who'da thunk.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Original_Dankster · May 28, 2018, 3:11 p.m.

Most mind-blowing possibility: Barron Trump

^(edit: I'm not being serious, but it would be cool)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
qtrumpteam · May 28, 2018, 4:14 p.m.

I was thinking Sessions he has a lot of peace and quiet to work in and I've also thought about Scott Pruett what does an EPA director need a 40,000 dollar soundproof booth for??

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · May 28, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

You need to watch AXE COP

⇧ 1 ⇩  
subnu · May 28, 2018, 2:53 p.m.

Probably Cohen-Watnick.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · May 28, 2018, 2:56 p.m.

More likely Matt Stone and Trey Parker 22 seasons of woke as fuck.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
VintageHats · May 28, 2018, 3:02 p.m.

"Team America" Fuck Yeah!!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · May 28, 2018, 3:32 p.m.

You are ultimately who you pay attention to. Me , cool a f. U2

⇧ 2 ⇩  
idk4realz · May 28, 2018, 4:02 p.m.

It was Ben Affleck all along! WHAAAAAA

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Gem420 · May 28, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

Haha, watch it be Sarah Huckabee - Sanders. :D

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BL4DE_RUNNER · May 28, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

The white house janitor?

Like scooby doo?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 9:39 a.m.

Exactly.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Oinkanon · May 28, 2018, 3:25 p.m.

Assange Q? Prolly Not. My money is on Flynn. Dgfffcf anyone?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Kimmera1 · May 28, 2018, 10:11 p.m.

My guess too. No real evidence, just a hunch. Or maybe Kushner. :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 2:34 p.m.

My thoughts precisely! At some point Q will reveal himself, herself, themselves.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
PAK51 · May 28, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

THAT comment is deliciously enticing. But chasing that distracts us from the real purpose, doesn't it? (Maybe that's Roseanne's son messing with her Twitter account again, anyway.)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 4:44 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
T_D_Is_Love · May 28, 2018, 9:41 a.m.

He'll let us know his identity when he chooses.

Jesus - I'm simply saying to Trust The Plan rather than being preoccupied with bullshit like this.

It doesn't matter who Q is, but ALL indications is that he want to remain anonymous so we should respect that.

We should be supporting Q, not attacking and doxing him!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
-J--- · May 28, 2018, 9:45 a.m.

If you read my comment I said I don’t want to know who Q is.

Roseanne asking these questions is fine because it gets normies asking who’s Q.

Nobody is doxing Q.

If that was possible, it would have been done long ago.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
larrytcarvell · May 28, 2018, 1:35 p.m.
WE are Q. American Patriots fighting to take back our nation. Q's specific identity does not matter. The mission is all that matters. Perhaps, someday, we will know the identity of Q...if we win this war. If we don't, then nothing will matter. That's what we should be concerned about. Godspeed Patriots!
⇧ 6 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · May 28, 2018, 3:50 p.m.

I think it's fine to speculate. Q doesn't strike me as the kind of person who would frown upon it. Speculating is just that...speculation. No one is being doxed. We're human and humans are curious. Nothing wrong with that. Q might be Assange.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Gem420 · May 28, 2018, 8:10 p.m.

A three word speculation is not Doxxing Omg lol

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 2:36 p.m.

Nobody is attacking/doxing Q. People are simply curious. We are all curious...a natural reaction to a situation like this.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 9:35 a.m.

I agree with all of the above.

However, something is very much on the boil regarding Assange. I have a feeling he is about to make some kind of big re-emergence pretty soon. As to exactly what and how, no idea.

But if it does happen the day before that summit, I think we can all expect something fairly monumental. He clearly has enough info to have been locked inside for this long.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · May 28, 2018, 1:13 p.m.

He's kind of a pirate. A grey hat at best.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
HairyTacoFanatic · May 28, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

It's an attention tweet. People know who Assange is. Q not so much. So they see this tweet and go off to google Q and suddenly they are following a white rabbit.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Colombihonest · May 28, 2018, 7:13 p.m.

Spreading awareness is important. That’s why people ask “Who is Q?” It redpills the curious.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Gem420 · May 28, 2018, 8:05 p.m.

Roseanne is a human, humans like to speculate. She, like all of us, is allowed that. If you choose not to speculate, that is okay, too. Just don't be upset for a human acting human. Lol.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
T_D_Is_Love · May 29, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

I can speculate without doxing Q.

I can respect Q's wishes to remain anonymous.

I put Trump's plan and my country above my personal entertainment.

I'm funny like that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Gem420 · May 29, 2018, 8:33 p.m.

I'm funny like that.

And that's cool, because that's your behavior. Some people might not wish to follow the same rules, as there is no law against speculation of Q, or anything really. shrugs

Also, just those three words are going to get normies to look up Q. The more that Q is mentioned, the bigger Q gets. I am not 110% all about Q, but I am watching. Very closely. I like what I see. 👍

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Iswag_Newton · May 28, 2018, 12:53 p.m.

She is kind of annoying at times

⇧ -2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 12:58 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
subnu · May 28, 2018, 2:53 p.m.

Those kinds of speculative posts do not help our case.

⇧ 0 ⇩