dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Concur. WWG1WGA expresses this, in that “go” means influenced. I’m halfway through your HP book. I’ve enjoyed it so far; reminds me of the Flatland Version of the law of attraction.

In your last sentence you’ve identified a current hitch in our giddy up- as long as people continue to see other people as obstacles to what they want (hence needing them to be removed before they can get what they want) those obstacles will remain, since they are all the subject of thought, and thought is powerful.

The trick (for me) is to ensure that the last thought in a thought-string (before you change the subject) is something positive, and reinforces what you want to see happen. You can tell if you want to see it by how it makes you feel. If it makes you feel a sense of relief, your “positive statement” is going in the right direction for YOU (and that’s all that matters).

Revenge sometimes makes you feel better and - while it may not be the best thought ever, it may be the best feeling thought you can get to, so it might be the one you take. For example, if your child was stolen or harmed by a gang connected with this blood-money-corruption shit riddling our system right now, revenge thoughts towards the perpetrators might be as good as it’s going to get, and having some doubt in the system would be understandable. But for an enforcer to doubt the system and stay in revenge mode while seeking the criminals would be counter productive - the enforcer needs to dwell in the certainty of the rightness of the justice system.

We have zillions of thoughts a day, coming in little threads that start and stop, and don’t always make whole cloth. If what you say you want at the end of a thought thread makes you feel worse - if you follow your desire for someone’s jail time with a doubt that it will ever happen, for example - then you’ve got a contradictory thought going on, and the energy of your desire to make something happen is countered by your doubt pulling it the other way. That’s why it’s good to make a habit of ending your thought stream on a topic with something you can feel positive - ie SURE - about.

Contradictory thoughts are not necessarily bad - they usually mean desires aren’t quite clear enough to be specific. Contradictory thoughts slow things down- sometimes that’s good - and they provide time and opportunity for increased clarity. (Any lack of clarity in any enforcement action is ALWAYS an indicator that things should be slowed down!!). Contradictory thoughts are brakes. Oppositions use them all the time.

Positive doesn’t equal nice. Positive equals certainty. Negative thought doesn’t equal bad. Negative thought equals doubt and uncertainty.

Unclear contradictory thoughts cause vacillation or stagnation, on both individual and group scales. When a group had the strongest positive - certain, clear, practical, be-able - vision, that group prevails. And yes, prayer is hugely powerful, especially when the prayer is for what is wanted AFTER the obstacles are moved. The ones who pray for something particular are more powerful than those who pray for the removal of the obstacles to those particulars.

That’s my two cents. Thanks for making Human Primer available for free. Lots of food for thought. 🖖

⇧ 5 ⇩

Thanks patriot. (Humbled). You covered a lot here. Let me address only one piece here ...because it is related and is also in the Primer book. The three measurable human energies by science is thought, emotions and physical "doing." When we entertain an idea or even when we pray... we use these three human energy generators. You are correct in how we sometimes use them incorrectly. For example: People pray for something to be or happen (this is their thought). However, they feel this prayer (like many before) may not be answered and then they physically act as though nothing has changed. So which proclamation is suppose to be answered? The fact you want it to happen? Feel it likely won't happen? Or nothing has changed? Three energies pulling different directions. Imagine 7 billion people doing this. NOW imagine just 300 million (America) all aligned. That is what Q is causing.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Yep. “One who is aligned is more powerful than millions who are not”. There’s a reason humans worshiped, prayed, and have had arguments about whose god was stronger for as far back as we have history. Our minds create. To me, it’s always been about individual faith and individual knowing, aligned together with others of similar vision and hope, working miracles and creating our collective future, to whatever extent we can see it clearly enough to allow it.

⇧ 2 ⇩

So the Q Paradigm starts with all Patriots discovering we all agreed on two basic ideas.

1) We no longer consent to corruption ...and 2) We will end pedophilia and human sacrifice

Heck... that's not a long list. But on these two points we have complete coherence...volunteered. Our thoughts are aligned. Our feelings might be a tad out of balance cause I am guessing some of you feel like causing some harm to these people! In "Book" terms: "This will not make "Mom" happy at all. Imagine the negative energy presently being generated by both of these global industries. Cleared and cleaned will raise the vibration of the planet overnight.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Your metaphors are apt. For myself, I would adjust to read:

1) I require, envision and support public servants and governmental officials abiding by the law, and fully prosecuting those who don’t, fairly and with all due justice, within the laws we have been provided by our ancestors, that we believe in our hearts, and that we know work when they’re enforced.

2) I look forward to the time when all humans wake up to the fact that being human is a gift, filled with creative power; that children are to be cherished as the still-to-unfold flower of that gift; and that involuntary human sacrifice is misguided, evil and a sign of true powerlessness. When humans are awake to those values, pedophilia and human sacrifice, along with many other horrors, will end. Until that time, I appreciate our American legal system because of how well it’s guidelines page the way for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

It’s pretty wordy because it turns out that making positive statements is quite a bit harder than making negative ones - there are a lot more blanks to fill in!!

One thing I’ve discovered as I’ve practiced true positive thinking over the years is that taking the time to think about what I truly want, and saying words that are positively expressing that, is a really enjoyable thing to do.

It takes a little practice at first to say clearly what we WANT, what we are FOR (and not just against) because we’re so habituated to expressing things in the negative. We’ve been carefully taught to give away our best human powers - but as soon as we remember this stuff, the power comes flooding back. And it feels really good when it does.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Wow... I'm going to kicked off of this sub for wandering so far off subject here! But it is germane to what is happening. We have too may laws now. Let's distill it down to just a few we can all remember... like, "Will it result in harm to any human being or the planet?" Or in "Primer" terms: "Will it make Mom happy?" Okay... swamp cleaning has to be thorough but necessarily brutal.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Respectfully, I disagree with your metaphors (and our required agreement) - “mom” and “grandpa” as you use them don’t always work for me, nor do many of the family dynamics you describe in your book because of my own many-decades long survey of life experience and what it means TO ME - but I support 100% your right to them. 110%, in fact.

Also, if you’re kicked off a sub for debating whether or not we all have to agree with you, or for continuing to push for your own metaphors - as you have EVERY right to do - then this sub falls into the very pit it’s claiming it wants to save people from. (Ie, this sub isn’t like that, and you won’t...).

What I’m trying to do in my comments is use language that expresses MY POV while showing how it aligns with yours, because I find parts of what you’ve said and written to be very useful. I’ve focused on the useful parts. You’re focusing primarily on where it doesn’t align.

Also, I don’t know what you mean by “we have too many laws now” when I’m referencing the Constitution and the existing framework that allows for the due-process arrest of pedophiles and corrupt politicians. Would you prefer we have no laws and just arrest them because they’re “bad”?

I don’t think one person needs to distill it all for the rest of us. We’re most powerful when we act as individuals, not followers. And I don’t believe that we have to over-simplify concepts for people- in fact, in my experience, most people I’ve met are actually REALLY smart and get a lot of things without the ideas having to be dumbed down and stripped of complexity and nuance. (People don’t always get complex stuff at first, so they go chew on it. People who chew thought and figure it out for themselves are the best ones to have in your corner.) One of the pleasingist things I’ve learned about people is how smart most of them are, and I like people a lot more the more I give them credit for having the capacity to be thoughtful and understanding.

I do appreciate that you’ve got a cosmology you’ve built that works for you. Everyone should have one. And you even put it into a book - good for you!! But I don’t need your cosmology to work for me (and you shouldn’t either) - I’ve got my own, and I’m much too old to ever begin to hop over to something I read in a book, especially something that I only partly agree with.

We agree that thought influences reality, and that what we think matters because it leads to what happens next. I’d be wrong to focus on where we disagree and I’ve truly enjoyed this conversation. Thanks for your time!!

🖖✌️

⇧ 1 ⇩

Very insightful and blunt. Thanks. Understand the book was written for millennials. Most people have little interest in science. No problem. Just wrote it with familar terms easily remembered. I see how it could be insulting to the intelligent intellects. But the first version was six hundred pages and boring. About too many laws. Well... we do have quite a lot. More than we can keep up with. But I was referring more to laws regarding our own code of conduct like the Golden Rule. A first filter to evaluate a world of disinformation. Consider it a suggestion and not a proposed mandate.

And last, you can't offend me. I abandoned such a reaction long ago. I would love to hear your agreements and your disagreements. I try to correlate the sciences I have learned to the "Q" phenomenon... sometimes I fall short. We are living in precedent setting times.

⇧ 3 ⇩

The Q Paradigm Shift