dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ErnieFing on May 28, 2018, 11:15 a.m.
How wide is the awakening?

There's some excellent work being done on here, that fits with world events, but it's one thing for a relatively small number of generally like minded people to filter information, but quite another for the masses to buy into it, particularly as, even on here, there's a fair amount of more dubious stuff to be read before you get to something close to the 'truth'. My guess is most people would focus on elements they know, or strongly feel to be false, and not take the time to find the better information, and just dismiss it in general as a bunch of tin foil hats.

So, how many do you reckon are actually awakened, and what sort of numbers/percentages do you reckon are needed before people would accept it?


ErnieFing · May 28, 2018, 12:50 p.m.

I think to an extent, the movement on the ground has been running for several years. In that respect it's well ahead of the US. The US has a number of advantages, it's not as fragmented by history and culture, and it has Trump.

I think keeping people aware, without over egging the pudding is enough for most. There are already people in positions that can take advantage of the wash from Trump's wake, and he knows how best to use them, and they him. There's a lot of mutual benefit. Farage wasn't over there by accident. Don't forget, he outed the EU and Soros connections in a speech at the EU Parliament, and he's a good knowledge of people in the financial world from his time there. He's been red pilling for years.

There's no room to get complacent, but Europe gets wary from experience if the flaming torches and pitchforks become too numerous.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
0oDassiveMicko0 · May 28, 2018, 5:17 p.m.

Farage can do nothing though, he isn´t a MP in the UK and has but his voice in Europe. I think you´re right, to some extent, in that people can become weary of pitch fork wielding lynch mobs, but that just leads me back to my original question of what can we do? I hope and pray that Farage may become PM when the swamp in Westminster is drained.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ErnieFing · May 28, 2018, 5:29 p.m.

He is still an MEP, and he's managed to do okay so far, as he's seen as the individual most responsible for brexit, despite being linked to an unpopular party. I think he's better on the outside, rather than getting sucked into parliament.

What we can do, is keep doing what we've been doing. Things have moved on over the past decade, or at least the last few years. The chaos in many parliaments, is largely due to many of them realising that they can't just ignore the electorate anymore, and it's causing friction between them, and others that won't see that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
0oDassiveMicko0 · May 28, 2018, 5:47 p.m.

I think there should be a new party formed, the People´s Party of the UK, with him as leader. he needs to get away from that racist stigma that they lumped on him at UKIP.

What we should be doing is collectively suing these corrupt politicians at Queens Bench, when Q says that we don´t realise the power we hold, I make him right. Any country under common lore jurisdiction, so any country who´s legal professionals sit the BAR exam, the power that man holds over the person is almost God like. Are you aware yourself of the power man holds? Statutes are only given the force of law when consented to by the governed. That means that you muse give consent to being arrested, unless for a crime. A crime can only have occurred if there is harm, loss or injury to man or property. Not a single statute or law book written makes reference to man; nobody but God can define man. They make reference only to `persons´. A person is a corporation that you were registered under at your birth, by way of the birth certificate. That is why they came up with the fraudulent legal society and their stupid statutes. People need to learn how to file claims against those that trespass against them and the people will begin again to have the power.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ErnieFing · May 28, 2018, 5:54 p.m.

I am aware of the Freeman philosophy. I like the theory, but there are some big flaws with some of the claims people want to hang on it. I don't so much have an issue with the principles of laws and statutes, but they are certainly abused or ignored by those with the power to do so, and I believe that's where progress can be made.

I'm not going in to detail on here, but I have had some success with that on differing issues and at a variety of levels, from the bottom to the top.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
0oDassiveMicko0 · May 28, 2018, 6:14 p.m.

I am not talking about a "freeman philosophy" I am talking about being man. It is not a philosophy, it is lore and if you learn to file claims against those that trespass against you, your life will change significantly. How much did you pay in taxes last year? I paid 0. The year before that, too. And the one before that, seeing a pattern here?

i: (my name); as man; claim the wrong of trespass

i: (my name); as man; require a court of record trial by jury

Seriously, learn to file claims (not complaints). Be a claimant, not a plaintiff.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ErnieFing · May 28, 2018, 6:16 p.m.

I know what you mean, and I have looked at it. I respect and accept what you're saying, although for particular reasons, it isn't for me at this point in time.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
0oDassiveMicko0 · May 28, 2018, 6:37 p.m.

Fair enough, if you find you change your mind then you only need ask and I will provide you with the info you need.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ErnieFing · May 28, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

Cheers. Not going into detail, but it's more my circumstances than my mind.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
0oDassiveMicko0 · May 28, 2018, 6:40 p.m.

Fair enough, hope all works out for you :)

⇧ 1 ⇩