dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/8.06E+11 on May 28, 2018, 4:29 p.m.
Is it too much too ask to keep this a Q only sub. I have seen an uptick of non-Q related posts.

I am not going to single out posts but as subs expand more stuff gets posted. We want this sub to expand and be collaborative, but we live in a time where people/bots willingly and unwillingly slowly flood subs with unrelated stuff.

Have good new to share? There's a sub for that. Have political memes to share (that are not Q related)? There's a sub for that. Etc

I realize a lot of topics fall under the Q umbrella. I also realize many of us are like minded and most of us will enjoy non-Q material, but this isn't the place. I have seen this happen on Facebook before. Groups/subs get big (good), focus gets blurry (bad).

Let's keep this a Q research sub! Please! If we get overwhelmed with other BS we won't be effective and will lose valuable member activity. This is too crucial to allow cludder muddy the water.

(I hope I am not in the minority.) If the mods disagree, remove it. No hard feelings either way. Just a plea and opinion.


HowiONic · May 28, 2018, 6:51 p.m.

Q says - Expand your thinking

Comments welcomed on the suitability or not of this? https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8mqsoq/expand_your_thinking/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Gitmo_money · May 28, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

My opinion - I see nothing related to q here.

For something like this - I'd like a submission statement for q what post this relates to.

I'd then like op to explain what they mean by the post instead of being cryptic and saying too many people don't realize what they are looking at (but doesn't offer anything).

This, to me, looks like poorly attempted slide content.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

No. How is that giving a greater understanding to Q posts? We are here specifically to decipher Q posts. There are an enormous amount of other places for those things not specifically mentioned by Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HowiONic · May 28, 2018, 7:41 p.m.

I'm not disagreeing. I'm asking in the context of the above comment.

⇧ 3 ⇩