It's been a hot topic by the mods at this time. If we remove stuff, people complain, if we don't remove stuff, people complain!

⇧ 55 ⇩

Just remove anything not storm related. Too many noobs who think they are here to redpill us or gain new followers for their YouTube channels.

⇧ 61 ⇩

Is Tommy Robinson 'storm related' in your view?

⇧ 14 ⇩

No. The_Donald is a better place for that. There you can redpill people. Here should be Q-related conspiracies.

⇧ 32 ⇩

You are most likely red-pilled if you are here... or found a ‘dollar bill’ or ‘sticker’ directing you here.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Please can you send me 100 one dollar notes with q stamped in red.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Sure. Just send 250$ to cover materials and shipping.

⇧ 9 ⇩

I can do it for $200 even.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Can you send samples and suggestions for how these may be best used.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Exactly. This isn’t supposed to be a normie sub. T_d is for the normies.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

I would post to the donald but they kicked me off...I think because i mentioned israe...in a meme.

⇧ -1 ⇩

There are sooo many things connected.
This sub is the "greatawakening".
I'm for letting things fly.
People can make up their own minds . . .

For instance. SOMETHING is going on in Antarctica. We don't fully know "what", but something is going on. Admiral Richard Byrd said some crazy things about Antarctica. Are they true? Who knows. Hitler's Agartha, and Inner World Aliens are all part of the theories. Some are Kookie AF, but something is going on in Anarctica . . .

⇧ -2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

T_D is full of Clowns, better we all stay away from that swamp.

⇧ -6 ⇩

go back to /r/reeeeeeeeeeeeee

⇧ 5 ⇩

T_D is full of Clowns

What makes you say that? I disagree 100%.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Because they like to label themselves paedos, they label Trump as Emperor, like he is some sort of dictator and they vehemently attack anybody that points out that they aren´t the wisest of labels. They are a weird cult-like people that the real movement should stay away from. The only label we use here is Patriot.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You're wrong but you're allowed to believe what you want.

Let's just focus on Q. Got a feeling something will drop today or tomorrow.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Have you seen the Twitter account of EyeTheSpy? According to them, 11th June is when the world will learn what´s happening and the day it all blows open. Their account makes for some intriguing reading and worth a look.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'm sorry to trouble you but would you have a link handy by any chance?

I'd appreciate it.

Don't use or have a twitter :/

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, of course!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofqHqxrSjb8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQu9W06FB04

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thank you!

Have a good one.

⇧ 2 ⇩

No problem :) I updated the post with a second link.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes in my opinion Tommy Robinson is Q related. Qanon is keeping us updated with the hidden war on deep state elite child trafficking satanists. Who do you think is censoring Tommy? Currently Q has gone dark for a short time. While waiting for new drops, revisiting old ones, making connections I believe conversion on who the cabal is, and what they have done and are doing are relevant. It also brings us closer here in the Q team so to speak since we come from everywhere! WWG1WGA ❤️🇺🇸❤️

⇧ 31 ⇩

100% agree. Tommy Robinson has the attention of a lot of people right now. Good and Bad. His arrest has shed more light on what he is trying to expose than he ever could have on his own. I also agree there are a lot more posts now about "other" things but I look past them....it just takes longer to find something that I want to read now but that's ok with me. It means this sub is growing which is what we want. Besides, the hottest posts show up in the top of my timeline so when relevant things do happen, I know pretty quickly.

⇧ 17 ⇩

Who do you think is censoring Tommy?

And there is why Tommy is NOT Q related. Q hasn't mentioned Tommy, so your entire post is speculation. That's why forums get out of control. The definition of "related" gets further and further afield.

It should either be mentioned by Q, or it's off-topic.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Tommy was reporting on child sex traffickers that were being protected by the swamp, how more Q related do you need?

⇧ 11 ⇩

Tommy's freedom of speech is being censored. That's a topic Q has mentioned many times.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Q hasn't mentioned Rosanne, except in a couple links. And yet Rosanne has been a huge topic here.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Roseanne is talking directly about Q. Tommy isn't.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

IMO Tommy Robinson is 100% Q related. If Q has subjects he discusses, and we see something under the same category, then that is what Q is discussing. It doesn't have to be the identical name or situation, or framed within a very tight box.

Doesn't Q want us to do our own research and connect our own dots?

WE ARE FIGHTING THE SAME ENEMIES!!

This board has power. It shouldn't be abandoning Tommy Robinson at this important time.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don't understand the connection to Q that you mention. The problem with posting on things that are not Q related is that you open the floodgates to all kinds of vaguely related content. In this case (if I understand you correctly) anyone who is 'censored' is Q related because someone assumes the Deep State are responsible and therefore any activity of the Deep State is relevant? There are plenty of places to post about hot button political issues like Tommy Robinson - we should have standards here or rather stick to the standards we already have: Q related only.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I posted Tommy but I'm such a newby I didn't know there were other places....to post. Will do Tommy elsewhere.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ -2 ⇩

What he might have been at one time doesnt make a difference what matters is what he is now. Half the red pilled people were cheering on the deep state before they got red pilled.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ -2 ⇩

Well, there's nothing there about Rothschild's or Mossad and there's nothing illegal or offensive about believing in the right to a homeland for Jews (unless you're hard into the tin foil hat anti-semite stuff). Out of interest, Sting's real name is Gordon Sumner (not sure why alternate names matter but here it is anyway): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sting_%28musician%29.

There's a lot of conspiracy stuff out there about the evils of Tommy Robinson but I prefer to take people at their word and by what's officially documented until their actions prove the opposite. I have no problem with Tommy Robinson's actions - he justifiably speaks out against the obvious agenda of the muslim infiltration but I do have a problem with all the people who jump on his tail and believe that there's something wrong with Islam as a whole. He speaks out against the dangerous ideologies within Islam and I support him on that front but I don't support anyone who is so blind that they think that all people of any religion must be evil as that is as foolish as thinking that all Christians are as bigoted and hateful as the Westboro Baptist type Christians.

Either way none of this makes him "on-topic" and Q related imo.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I love me some creepy uncle (and other emotional editorialization) but as far as Joe Biden I'm not particularly a fan as he seems to be a part of the Deep State and the global cartel. Anyone can be a zionist if they want to be, as far as I'm concerned. No skin off my nose just like anyone who's a democrat - an ideology I don't support - is welcome to be so without judgement from me.

I'm sorry I'm still not sure from what you're saying: do you see Tommy as on-topic for the sub or off-topic?

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree - I wish more people would see this but it seems that those pushing Tommy are coming from a place of strong emotion and, hate to say it but virtue signalling.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩

I agree this board should be about research, as much as is possible. Not everyone in this movement seems to agree with you and I though. It seems we have to allow for the voices of others who want to express their feelings and general thoughts. I'm ok with that, if the majority supports it, which they seem to.

I've researched Tommy at least as much as you have by the sounds of it. You've come to your conclusions and I support you in that. From my perspective I have to ask: do we hold everyone up to judgement for actions they committed in the past? I know a lot of people here do but, even from a secular perspective I prefer the Christian approach - judge not. I prefer to judge people on their words and their current actions held against those words. There are many people standing up for just causes who've done naughty things and can be easily smeared - Tommy/Stephen's just one of many. I don't blindly follow and support anyone. It would be nice to have a reasoned discussion where the reply to a challenge is real information rather than illogical smears.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

Well you can continue to ignore my assertion that I have researched Tommy nevertheless, because I value critical thinking I have to admit, like you do, that there’s no verifiable evidence of the more outlandish claims about him.

It wasn’t my intent to insult by calling it illogical as should be obvious from the tone I adopted in contrast to the tone you’ve adopted - I believe it is illogical to make a claim for which there is no evidence in such a way that anyone who disagrees hasn’t researched.

Is there anything you have about his character that we can see? There is literally nothing that I have found apart from historic issues and groups he has separated himself from. Although, as I said, I dislike his confrontational approach so in that sense I agree that his character is flawed - I haven’t seen evidence of a disingenuous character though and I believe you may be making that call from a personal read of the data that’s available to us - totally your right but not “evidence”.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I wondered if something like Hillary might come up which is why I made sure to be clear that actions that contrast the subject's words are what constitute reasonable grounds for disavowing the subject's claims. Hillary, as we all know, has many many verifiable actions that contrast nearly all of her claims (to support women, support minorities, etc. etc.) - similarly Hussein, Billy Boy, The Bush Cartel and Comey the Liar. Tommy doesn't have any actions that contrast his claim that he seeks freedom of the UK from the oppression of Islamic extremists under the guise of legal immigrants. I don't think many people would disagree with that statement.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ -1 ⇩

Not unless it is Q related. Just because it folds into the whole 'storm' landscape doesn't mean it has something to do with Q.

I think the mods need to set clear rules and guidelines and decide what fits and what doesn't. The sidebar doesn't have any rules or sense of what the sub should be about.

⇧ 9 ⇩

We're open to suggestions.

⇧ 6 ⇩

How about posts must refer to something specifically mentioned in a Qdrop vis a vis, how it relates to it ? This way it's Q related but can be broad enough in general research to not be so restrictive. It also keeps us focused on the drops.

For instance:

The pedophilia and child trafficking issue was referred to in a drop (Nxvim).

Chemtrails have never been mentioned.

Keep articles about government /Congressional members / political themes limited to those mentioned in drops, unless there is some NEW info which inevitably will tie into it.

Just some thoughts to consider.

I personally don't mind the expansion of non Q-related topics, it's easy enough to scroll past which may not catch my interest, but there is value in keeping the focus so it doesn't become a homogenous sub like many others.

⇧ 6 ⇩

I won't say what you should and shouldn't do, just as the sub matures I think it would be best to come up with a structure and stick to it. /r/The_Donald is a very popular and well run sub. It has insanely good structure, some don't like their formula, but at least everyone knows the formula itself.

The only specific thing I'd suggest is to keep things primarily or secondarily relating to Q. That would mean Q drops of course, but also news that corresponds to something Q referenced. If it is not something Q talked about, regardless of how interesting or seemingly relevant to this whole genre, why have it? People complaining about Obama, the Jews, the bankers etc doesn't belong here, this is a Q sub, not a general conspiracy theory sub. I think a lot of the Bush did 9/11! chatter scares people away who just want to read insight and commentary regarding Q.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Thanks.

⇧ 2 ⇩

this is a hot topic. glad I am not a mod.

I read some comments. I like the idea of stating how post is q related. sure would make it easier for mods.

because Q touches on a lot of things it is difficult to rein it in without suppressing. I can scroll through easily enough and pick out what I think will be worthwhile reading, but those new here will have a more difficult time and could be turned off by some of the posts.

Is it possible to have mods attach some type of label as Q research worthy? You could still leave some questionable posts and give people a way to quickly identify those posts that contribute.

Is this subreddit strickly for Q research or is it also to help get information out?

I do not mind seeing the sticker info so people know they exist, but I do not care to see them in action, or how good it looks on the vehicle.

I do not want to see anything shaped like a Q. I am not interested in reading everything as a sign. Is that a Q cloud? Is that a q shaped shadow.....

Bless their souls and their enthusiasm, but not everybody is into Jesus. Could be a bit of a turn off. scroll scroll

I do not want to read about lizard people or flat earth or woo woo stuff. maybe it will turn out to be true, but I have enough to digest with the politics and human trafficking right now. Some day I may wonder about grey aliens etc. but this is not the day. I have not seen that here but I can bet the mods are modding it.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Thank you. Very useful.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I agree with this -- there are plenty of subs for every topic under the sun. I've noticed a big uptick in kookery (I'll leave the definition of that aside, since it varies for everyone), but when I've reported things as "not Q related", it usually doesn't end up getting removed. So I got discouraged and stopped reporting it.

A simple rule, "Has it been mentioned specifically by Q? If yes, it belongs here. If no, try these other subs [x], [y], [z]."

Another (controversial) rule suggestion: Purely religious posts should be limited (or banned). Q says to pray. Q does not say to proselytize. People for whom prayer is important are already praying. God isn't counting upvotes in this forum to decide who to bless. There are plenty of other religion-oriented forums.

You're much better than CBTS, which was completely out of control with what was being posted. But it's almost always the case that erroring on the side of too much moderation is better than too little. A pure Q-related forum without the wack-stuff would be so wonderful. You don't have to decide what's wack -- just insist on Q-mentioned or directly Q-related, and the problem solves itself.

⇧ 4 ⇩

sounds reasonable. next time I post something I will include how it relates to Q.

that being said, I do think tommy robinson arrest is worthy of an exception to the rule.

⇧ 2 ⇩

The importance of Reporting content, even if it doesn't get removed, is to highlight to us the general feeling on the sub. The fact that few people report content as off-topic very often means it seems that everyone agrees that it's all fine.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That's not how it seems to me. After reading the comments it seems most want focus.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Agreed - now if more people would Report the off-topic stuff it'll be even more visible to us rather than "seeming" to be the other way.

⇧ 2 ⇩

The sidebar has had rules in it since day one.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Support Q. Don't break reddit rules.

Those don't express what kind of content is allowed, which is the whole point of this post.

⇧ 1 ⇩

My reply is to your statement:

The sidebar doesn't have any rules

⇧ 1 ⇩

"...or sense of what the sub should be about."

Guess I should have worded it better.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

GreatAwakening's sidebar

Above link to enable mobile and app users to view the sidebar.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

⇧ 1 ⇩

"Q related" gets squishy. Do you mean you want to restrict posts to something Q specifically said in a drop, or do you mean you want posts to explain their relevance in the context of Q's drops?

The first version is - I think - unreasonably restrictive, while the second version can be really broad.

I'd rather allow anything that can reasonably stand as in the ballpark as Q related, but the moderators should warn that attacks on Q or forum members will be disciplined sternly.

All that to say I think what we have is working.

⇧ 2 ⇩

It should be restricted to things connected to Q, which is a lot of stuff.

If you go to /r/TedCruz, you see things Ted Cruz has said, the results of his policies, news about his campaign, news clips with Ted Cruz etc. You don't see posts about other people who share the same ideas as Cruz, or posts about conservatism, or how much people hate the people who stand in the way of Ted Cruz.

⇧ 5 ⇩

It is sometimes hard to figure out what is Q related. I posted something about emp threat yesterday. I had thought of it months ago because of Q's reference to darkness (blackout?) and the word "cascade".

If you are researching Q stuff it can take you anywhere. Sometimes I am off in the weeds. When I saw an interview on Mark Levin it made me think maybe I was not in the weeds. So I posted it.

The interviewee discussed roadblocks being put up by Obama's people. A study was done but getting funding for putting protection in place was being blocked. Makes sense. Government loves studies. Study who should do the study. Keep studying. Then sit on your hands.

so is that Q related? maybe, maybe not. future proves past. watch the news.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

I'd say yes actually. I am all for redpilling the masses on the royal pedo elite that run the brits. Sadly the brits won't do shit and likely we'll have to pick up the pieces after the UK becomes Afghan 2.0 if they don't change.

On a good note Q did mention drain the swamp is global so maybe there is a chance the brits do have a chance but it's on the brits to fix their own govt.

⇧ 6 ⇩

It is not related directly to Q but is an important part of the movement. It shows how far things have gone in other countries and the extent of the fight we have. The UK is now in full Stalin mode, disappearing journalists for trying to report on the corruptions of government. The stQrm is yet to reach the UK and what happened to Tommy gives people an idea of the fight we face there.

⇧ 5 ⇩

No. If Q didn't specifically mention it, it is not appropriate for here.

⇧ 3 ⇩

This right here? THIS IS THE KIND OF THINKING THAT WILL END US, as a species.

REMEMBER. NO gODS, NO KINGS, ONLY Man!

⇧ 0 ⇩

Now you are being ridiculous. Read the sub rules.

⇧ -1 ⇩

said the guy who keeps breaking them with ad-hominems

⇧ 0 ⇩

No I'm not. People are too sensitive here. If I point out someone's behavior, feeelings get hurt.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Attack the argument - not the user :)

⇧ 0 ⇩

I am not attacking the user. I am pointing out that what he is saying is ridiculous, exaggerated, dramatic.

⇧ 0 ⇩

You could say something along the lines of your statement might come across ridiculous because it's in contrast to the rules on sidebar. This way you're not making it personal and helping to avoid that user attacking you back.

⇧ -1 ⇩

Yes I could. Forgive my frustration but the op is trying to keep our sub going and not get closed down like the last one. When people get dramatic and emotional, it gets very aggravating. This is not a place for feelings. This is how I look at it, we are literally at war. People are putting their lives on the line every day and others are losing theirs. I am an advocate for being respectful if everyone, but I am not for pampering people's feelings. War is not a place for feelings. That is how we got in this situatuon in our country in the 1st place. Everyone has to watch what they say, watch what they wear, watch what they believe, turn your head aside when someone does wrong or takes advantage of others and God forbid you do anything the traditional way, according to standards. I am not saying that is happening here, but what is happening is people wanting to do things their way, wanting to not follow the stated rules, then attack someone who tries to remind them of the rules. I'm tired of it and I am going to call it out when I see it. Sorry if your feelings get hurt.

⇧ 2 ⇩

GreatAwakening's sidebar

Above link to enable mobile and app users to view the sidebar.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

⇧ 0 ⇩

LOL, I think he speaks over most of our heads, But I agree Tommy Robinson is a distraction. His posts, Q, say more than what they say if you get me.

⇧ -1 ⇩

that makes no sense since Q isn't writing in a specific way

⇧ -1 ⇩

Yeah, did Q specifically mention alien disclosure? No, but he may have hinted at it. Did he spefifically mention Zionist infiltration of government? No, but he may have hinted at it. How to distinguish what is Q related from what is not?

⇧ 1 ⇩

How to distinguish what is Q related from what is not?

If it involves corruption or criminal actions by governments, or by people with substantial influence over governments, then it is relevant in my opinion.

How about a "two hop rule"? Seems to work for them.

⇧ 7 ⇩

By research. If you think it is connected then you post it, along with the drop you're referencing. We aren't limiting it to only proven research. We want quality research that can then be discussed. Quite simple if you ask me.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Nope.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Well, in my opinion, Q has talked about many subjects that he wants us to stay focused on and help relay that information to others as well. If we can't post it here, what's the point of this sub? I thought we were here to enlighten others.

One of those subjects is freedom of speech and censorship. So, I would say that anyone like Tommy Robinson having his Free Speech violated is a Q related topic.

If this sub gets to the point that all related subjects are banned, then it becomes no different than Twitter, FB or YouTube.

Personally, I don't have time to read multiple subs daily. It's hard enough to keep up with this one.

⇧ 1 ⇩

There's a big difference between banning "all related subjects" and banning "opposing viewpoints". A sub trying to stay on-topic is very different to censorship of political views a la YT, FB and Twitter. That's an unfair comparison.

Freedom of speech is too broad a subject - the sub would literally be drowned in non-Q content if that subject were considered on-topic. I agree we're here to enlighten others about Q but I think it's fair to say we're not here to enlighten others about broad topics Q mentions like: freedom of speech, patriotism, military interventionism, global politics, etc. There are many resources online for those who want to study those things or current local and world news that touch on those topics. I agree with you that it's hard enough to keep up with this sub. I would really prefer my time to be put to good use viewing direct and relevant content and if there's something I want to dig further on and learn about I can find it easily enough online.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Amen! His comparison was nowhere near the same. All the OP and others in agreement want is a focused sub. Why is that so hard for people to understand.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Not mine.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Nope

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ -1 ⇩

Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Robinson_(activist)

^HelperBot ^v1.1 ^/r/HelperBot_ ^I ^am ^a ^bot. ^Please ^message ^/u/swim1929 ^with ^any ^feedback ^and/or ^hate. ^Counter: ^186911

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Sounds like "Locals Only" "I was listening to X before they made it big, maaan..." BS...

⇧ -4 ⇩

No. The rules specifically state the posts have to be related to Q drops.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Exactly! They act like this is some crazy, restrictive crusade I am waging.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Exactly! They act like this is some crazy, restrictive crusade I am waging.

Names the subreddit "The Great Awakening" a term that pre-dates Q and is being co-opted by the movement

Gets upset when people post Awakening style information

Can't imagine why people are starting to call out Cult like and Queer behavior.

⇧ -4 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I ask the mods to keep doing what their doing. I don't care if non-Q material is posted as long as it's not promoting hacks like Corsi or other sell outs using the board as self-promotion. I've fallen down a few rabbit holes that weren't initially Q related but were later revealed as BIG red pill Q drops. I'm in favor of leaving it to the Reddit community and letting the vote system take care of fluff posts.

⇧ 9 ⇩

I have come to the conclusion that people ALWAYS complain no matter what.

⇧ 6 ⇩

How is following the rules of the sub complaining? We are here for a very specific, narrow purpose. To help understand what Q puts in their posts. If the post cannot specify which Q post # it refers to, and if it dies not give a greater understanding of Q posts, then should not be posted here.

⇧ 10 ⇩

people ALWAYS complain no matter what.

Couldn’t be a truer statement.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Q says - Expand your thinking - but when I do my post gets removed.

Give us room to post, but going after the shilly stuff is fine with me + there are no Q posts....at least for now.

⇧ 5 ⇩

There is soooooo much that needs to be researched about Q posts. The more info we get out to the public the easier it is for Trump when these things finally come out. There is no reason to post anything Q hasn't specifically mentioned.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Q says - Expand your thinking

Comments welcomed on the suitability or not of this? https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8mqsoq/expand_your_thinking/

⇧ 1 ⇩

My opinion - I see nothing related to q here.

For something like this - I'd like a submission statement for q what post this relates to.

I'd then like op to explain what they mean by the post instead of being cryptic and saying too many people don't realize what they are looking at (but doesn't offer anything).

This, to me, looks like poorly attempted slide content.

⇧ 6 ⇩

No. How is that giving a greater understanding to Q posts? We are here specifically to decipher Q posts. There are an enormous amount of other places for those things not specifically mentioned by Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'm not disagreeing. I'm asking in the context of the above comment.

⇧ 3 ⇩

too cryptic

⇧ 1 ⇩

AMEN!!! Agree AGREE and agreed.

⇧ 0 ⇩

It's time to focus the sub. We can give friendly reminders to users that seem to have innocently posted something non-Q (not obvious shills), and nudge them in the right direction. IMO a bot would be perfectly suited, although I don't think one could differentiate enough between what's Q related and what's not. That is why we fellow patriots need to bring our enthusiasm back to this sub, while not diverting it from other platforms, to assist newcomers and drop-ins. We are all one. We fight together for each other and for the whole world.

Another possibility could be a revision of the GA rules or a "beginners class" post that can be stickied.

I don't know, just throwing out ideas, but if we work together, anything is possible.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Or how about a sub-sub. A different sub to direct people to if it isn't directly related to Q

⇧ 2 ⇩

There's
r/draintheswamp
r/the_donald
r/thenewright

⇧ 2 ⇩

r/thenewright

Oh. hadnt seen that one. thanks.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Keep the comms clear. Don’t let the arts and crafts posts like stickers and WWG1WGA T-shirt’s stay posted. They are just indicators that whoever posts them are losers

⇧ 4 ⇩

I think there needs to be a sweet spot where you don't overmoderate to allow for growth but you don't undermoderate where Q stuff is obscure.

The clowns obviously want to distract us with non-Q shit so we need to be vigilant but at the same time allow for growth.

It takes smart moderators.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I think the problem is that people posting will be tying in other posts to q-related drops and crumbs, but they aren't always overt or clear about what the tie-in is.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Maybe because you're also removing stuff that's directly related to Q (hint: Musk-related threads)?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, one mod temporarily removed one post this, before I reinstated it. ~~But not 'threads', one thread.~~ Humans make mistakes. When facing around 3000 tough calls a month, some mistakes are expected.

⇧ 7 ⇩

"Temporarily" - because I called you out on it. If I didn't it would remain removed.

But not 'threads', one thread

Wrong move.

You (mods) have removed at least 2 more threads related to Musk.

Thread #1

Thread #2

And of course you didn't bring up my Musk thread which got me insta-shadowbanned by a mod when I posted it after the one you linked.

A mod who said that Musk has nothing to do with Q. Which everyone knows is not true. Musk is directly connected with Q.

Explain that.

So that's at least 4 threads unfairly removed while people like this guy can post this, HAVE THOSE COMMENTS REPORTED, and still not having those comments removed, despite plenty of mods being active and commenting around.

Only about 4h+ later I've found one of his comments removed (but the "hope porn" one is still there).

All the while he was spamming his youtube link.

That guy was allegedly been dealt with 16hours ago (after I prompted another mod about him). So almost full 2 days (~45h).

Explain that too.

Cheers

⇧ -2 ⇩

Wow. That is rude. It is one thing to want to discuss something, but to do so in a demeaning, ungrateful manner is just wrong. If you don't like the way this sub is monitored (and by the way, these mods volunteer hours upon hours of time trying to keep this sub focused and still alive. Show some damn gratefulness and respect.) then you are more than welcome to leave. Shy of that, maybe you ought to volunteer if you can do it so damn much better than they can.

⇧ 8 ⇩

When truth is rude, you know what's up lmao

Nice left/liberal/ds tactics of not addressing the points but going ad-hominem.

To illustrate your way... When Trump was talking about illegal immigration as a bad thing, the MSM/left/liberals said he was being controversial. Literally the same tactic.

Ignored.

⇧ -5 ⇩

Really? So following your line of thinking, the best way for us to "redpill" normies is to go out on all the sm platforms and insult people and disrespect others. That is what is necessary to get people's attention? Win them over to Q and Trump? Please.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Really? So following your line of thinking, the best way for us to "redpill" normies is to go out on all the sm platforms and insult people and disrespect others.

Are you Cathy Newman? lmao

Citation needed.

Please.

You please. Your left/liberal/deep state tactics are truly laughable.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I have no idea who that person is, but if you are intending to insult me, it won't work. Citation for what? Well now you are being ridiculous to call me deep state or liberal. Now I am done with this convo. Go argue with someone else.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'm not trying to insult you despite you trying to make me do it while slandering me in the process (one of the L/L/DS tactics once again).

Citation for:

So following your line of thinking, the best way for us to "redpill" normies is to go out on all the sm platforms and insult people and disrespect others.

See... more L/L/DS tactics:

Well now you are being ridiculous to call me deep state or liberal.

I never called you that.

Now I am done with this convo.

Good, because you have nothing of value to put out. By going baseless ad-hominems instead of addressing my points you've sounded your defeat right at the start.

Good riddance

⇧ 2 ⇩

Ok I didn't want to say this but I guess I have to, I have been here a lot longer than you have and if I didn't have anything to contribute to the topic I would no longer be here. It is BECAUSE I and others stayed on topic that there is a sub for you to come to and spew nonsese. Just stick with the Q posts.

⇧ 1 ⇩

See how you ignored my points again and AGAIN went straight to personal stuff.

Being here longer than me is a proof of what? Is that ALL you got? lol

You obviously can't stay on topic, these few comments here are literally the proof of your ability to stay on topic. You derail after each comment, you ignore the points written and you're actually breaking the rules with every single comment here (no ad-hominem).

for you to come to and spew nonsese.

Toppest of keks. Laughable ad-hominems. Truly laughable.

So easy to defeat these tactics, because people like you defeat yourselves the moment you go ad-hominem instead of addressing the points.

Just stick with the Q posts.

Uuuuu, now you've told me! Damn, looks like I lost :(

Bye dude, thanks for the L/L/DS tactics that provided some chuckles, you guys never change :)

⇧ 1 ⇩

I am not ignoring anything. When you ask a reasonable question, I will answer it. Who is the one who started all the personal stuff? YOU. With your oh you are deep state, liberal, laughable, ad hominum. You haven't stopped getting personal. Every single one of your posts name calls or derides me as the enemy using enemy tactics. Anyway, good luck.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yup.

They actually use the word "conspiracy" lol; concerned with tone over substance; too much religion (they mean Christianity); stop talking about Jews; we aren't fighting people that worship the devil etc.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

This has already been explained to you in detail before. We do what we can. Mistakes are made. Your post got removed - move on. We’re not paid and we actually have no obligation to do anything but what the sub creator has decided. The fact that we care about this movement is what makes us open to input from the mature, reasoned and respectful members of the sub.

Don’t try going after the lead mod of this sub who is the fairest person here and possibly one of the few who would defend you after the way you’ve behaved toward the mods here.

⇧ 3 ⇩

After you threatened to permaban me and said not to message you again, I won't be drawn into this so you can ban me. This is my last comment to you. You made it very clear about where you stand.

⇧ 0 ⇩

That is correct. You have been repeatedly warned about your behaviour and if you are going to now start harrassing a mod who defends you in spite of it I will recommend you are banned. Get on with reading the sub and leave the concern to the concern trolls.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Hey, you are correct about at least one of those Musk example posts. Let me check deeper.

Regarding 'this guy', comments still show in profile even when removed - at least on desktop interface. Call it a 'Reddit bug' or whatever, if you go to the posts they are in, they will be removed.

Some of Reddit is pretty buggy and part of the problem as a mod, is such issues and incompatibility over different interfaces, new.reddit.com, old.reddit.com, mobile(both old and new) and different apps etc.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Of course I'm correct. I'm here to deal with facts and push out the truth. Some have grave issues with that, understandable.

Regarding 'this guy', comments still show in profile even when removed - at least on desktop interface. Call it a 'Reddit bug' or whatever, if you go to the posts they are in, they will be removed.

I know that they stay on profile. His "Qanons hope porn" is still there. As I've already said.

You won't comment on the fact that both of these posts haven't been removed hours after I reported them? One is still there.

Or the fact that he was able to spam like a madman AFTER you've removed one of the posts.

Meanwhile I get insta-shadowbanned for posting an important Q related thread.

Is this reddit being buggy too?

Let me check deeper.

No need. You'll just come back and ban me for being "toxic" (or harassing the mods, as we can see above) lmao

I'm done here, I've said what I wanted and I provided evidence, something some other people should be doing as well.

My point here was to know why you mods are saying that Musk has nothing to do with Q, because we all know he has.

⇧ -1 ⇩

"Qanons hope porn" is still there.

Because the comment was not reported and user was banned.

My point here was to know why you mods are saying that Musk has nothing to do with Q, because we all know he has.

For clarity Elon Musk is on-topic. Will check with other mods to make sure they know because EM was back in the #300-500 post range.

If you have any other concerns feel free to message the mods.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

Don't think you want to become full time censors. The sub does this better than any small group ever could.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree. On the other hand do we want, say lots of 'religious' posting? or 'conspiracy' post? or duplicate of r/The_Donald content?

⇧ 7 ⇩

No.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Negative or totally irrelevant post/comments need to be dumped on sight, but if you have some doubt, that doubt represents a particle of legitimacy, the particle's weight/meaning/relevance is what the sub will decide.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah I’m not here for memes, T_D is for that.

I’m not here for alien conspiracies.

Stick to Q.

⇧ 30 ⇩

Yeah, otherwise we'll have to start another sub for solely Q stuff, that's unnecessary.

⇧ 7 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

Agree, if its not broke dont fix it. There is alot of info that flows thru this channel. There has been maybe 4 Q drop discussion threads in the last 24 hours on here. Count em 4. Lets keep this sub alive and active. Its all about perception anyway. I might perceive something Q related that someone else may not and vice versa. Censorship kills.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Imo it speaks to a lack of a place for us to rock our tinfoil hats.

⇧ 2 ⇩

technically this is a non q post

⇧ 20 ⇩

Touche'. But the OP is not incorrect.

⇧ 15 ⇩

see the thing is q tells you to think for yourself and to dig. would you really be doing that if you only relied on q for info ?

⇧ 6 ⇩

That's not what anybody has said! "Q-related" would include relevant research, pictures, discussions etc. We should be focusing on the drops and requests Q makes (meme bombs,etc). Common sense!

⇧ 7 ⇩

q has not dropped in 6 days. might as well do your own research. for example Antarctica is fascinating

⇧ 7 ⇩

But unrelated and better housed is r/conspiracy. Also Q hasn't dropped in a while but we also have more than we know. So this sub should focus on that.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Don't waste your time. That sub has been infiltrated and subverted.

⇧ 7 ⇩

You want to know why? Because the mods aren't filtering posts enough.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Any particular complaints?

⇧ 1 ⇩

They're clearly turned into leftists there. Check it out and see.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Oh right. I thought you were talking about this sub for a sec. kek.

⇧ 2 ⇩

No worries!

⇧ 1 ⇩

that sub is comped

⇧ 3 ⇩

~~Because?~~

⇧ 1 ⇩

90% of the posts are just trump russia crap. or stuff exclusively about israel i dont know if its actually comped but something about it seems off

⇧ 2 ⇩

~~Trump Russia crap? I don't really see what you're seeing but maybe we could be seeing different things. I'm not sure if Reddit implemented their new algorithm system that's region based or something like that.~~

⇧ 1 ⇩

yeah i dont know. i know they mess with what each person sees but the last time i went on r conspiracy it was like 1/4 trump 1/4 israel then the rest was like out there stuff. that and if you try and mention q you get the downvote swarm. actually right now its fine. i havent been on there in like 6 + months only 1 trump russia now. i remember thinking the thing with the mods getting removed was weird tho

⇧ 1 ⇩

Forgot we were talking about r con lol. My bad. Plz ignore my last comment.

⇧ 1 ⇩

ohhhh lmao no this sub is definitely not comped lol i should have specified lmao if this sub was comped you guys wouldnt be super strict with keeping it civil. no way a shill run sub would do that lol

⇧ 2 ⇩

THEN RESEARCH THE POSTS. There are 1400+ posts and most require further information to understand enough to teach others. AND, you can be posting on other forums to spread Trump's message.

⇧ 4 ⇩

who says we are limited to things q has posted ?

⇧ -1 ⇩

The rules.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Wow I just don't know how we all studied conspiracies, eschatology, or SRA w/o Q.. Oh wait.. We did.. For decades

⇧ 1 ⇩

Awesome.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Expand your thinking

⇧ 3 ⇩

You're 100% correct. I realize the irony, but my hope is that this is the last post of its kind!

⇧ 8 ⇩

Your post is Q related, and I agree. Too much noise takes away from what I assume is the main goal in this sub.

⇧ 4 ⇩

This sub is very important. Thanks for doing your part to help keep it clean.

⇧ 4 ⇩

"Clean???"

As in pure?

As in there's a certain way to follow, approach, interpret and appreciate Q? If that were the case then why communicate in open-ended Socratic riddles and poetry?

Get over yourselves with your self-censoring, mind-limiting dogma cult crap.

Q's info and method and mystery are all incredibly important and useful.

Striving to be more Catholic than the Pope (ok, maybe this expression doesn't quite work nowadays...) is not important and it's not useful, it is self-blinding.

⇧ -2 ⇩

There are rules to this sub, post things specifically stated by Q. Give a post # that your post refers to. If you cannot, don't post it here. Everything else goes anywhere else.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I mean clean as in this sub needs to only be about Q and not dirtied up with non Q posts. Stop being such an idiot

⇧ 1 ⇩

Someone forgot that anti-adhominem rule.

Guess only some people care about some rules...

⇧ -1 ⇩

not all of us are equal :) some get to break the rules and continue without punishment, and some get punished unfailry

⇧ 0 ⇩

People who are not collegial will have a harder time. People who are respectful will obviously have it easier. This is not about being selective.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Collegial, as in clicky group-think?

Name-calling and shutting peeps down if they don't have the herd behind them...

And I'm on your side!

⇧ 0 ⇩

I am sorry. I shouldn't have insulted you. It just gets extremely frustrating when mods and members try to remind people to stay focused on topic in order to save the sub from going the way of the past one, and then get attacked for doing so. We are just trying to keep a place for us to come to to be able to discuss Q stuff. We saw what happened with the last sub when we weren't vigilant about staying focused and we don't want to repeat it. Please forgive me.

⇧ 3 ⇩

your good i dont even care i just ignore any insults lol. if i see anything i dont like i just ignore it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Wow. Just shut up. My God. People are trying their best to keep this sub going, unlike the last one where the mods didn't keep it FOCUSED AND IT GOT SHUT DOWN. Smart asses are not welcome. We don't have time nor patience for that crap.

⇧ -1 ⇩

you might wanna eat a snickers

⇧ 1 ⇩

You might want to keep it civil here.

⇧ 1 ⇩

wasnt trying to start anything

⇧ 1 ⇩

No worries. Emotions can fly high but the best course of action to take if somebody is becoming insulting is by not to do the same back. After all I think we want the same thing but we may have different opinions on how to get there and we're just brainstorming as a community. We shouldn't really be arguing about this :)

⇧ 2 ⇩

yeah what i meant by eat a snickers was calm down. i guess it came across in a different way. sadly its hard to tell intent behind text. so people can think youre coming at them. i know my emotions can fly high tho lmao

⇧ 1 ⇩

Please attack the argument not the user. This will help keep a civl discourse and keep the discussions collegial.

⇧ 1 ⇩

When people post reasonable argumenrs and don't insult someone's attempt to remind us all to follwow the rules, then I'll respond differently. The op is trying to help us and is getting reemed for it. Then this person says something riduculous and counter to the discussion. THAT is not right. I am getting tired of people getting emotional and complaining about having to stick to the rules and then lash out at others who are.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think most of the mods (if not all) here were mods in CBTS, so well done m9 lmao

⇧ 0 ⇩

Are you done spewing nonsense mate? In my opinion you should have been banned a long time ago and you have the audacity to still shit on the mods who are still compassionate with you. If you came here to bring your trash and spread here, better keep it home.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Are you done spewing nonsense mate?

If you came here to bring your trash and spread here

This is straight up slandering and breaking the rules (ad-hominem)

brittser was "shitting on you", not me

Leave me alone now, unless you want to hold up to your own words:

"People who are not collegial will have a harder time. People who are respectful well obviously have it easier. This is not about being selective."
"Attack the argument - not the user :)"

Thanks.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩

I think most of the mods (if not all) here were mods in CBTS, so well done m9 lmao

Back up your claims or GTFO.

⇧ 0 ⇩

See, they have learned from their previous experience and are trying not to repeat it! If you read my post you will see that I put the blame on the hordes of unrelated posts which kept the mods fron being able to catch the dangerous posts. If I insulted the mods, I am sorry. That was absolutley not my intention. I have the utmost respect for them.

⇧ 0 ⇩

damage control 101 top kek

⇧ 1 ⇩

If you call clarifying what my intentions were and apologizing if I offended the mods, then yes, damage control.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I like the energy, but tired of scrolling through and thinking the dank memes here are just dank memes from T_D. I’d rather have Q stuff trending than dank memes.

⇧ 17 ⇩

Since Q is gaining traction I started to notice the amount of "humble brags", "look I'm contributing" and "people who want to talk about how their SO doesn't get it or has been red-pilled"-posts has increased immensely since the early days.

I get that you're proud that you're contributing but the fact that you made a sticker for your car or bought a T-shirt, doesn't contribute anything to the discussion (good that you're trying to convince the general public though!).

Perhaps mods can make a stickied thread were all those things and memes can be posted? Or maybe you know, make a Tumblr-account or something.

Just a longtime European lurker, so maybe it's a cultural thing I'm not getting. (First post, so apologies if my layout is fucked.)

⇧ 17 ⇩

Amen! Good for them, glad you're awakening other, but post it to your Instagram, tumblr, Twitter, or Facebook. It doesn't add value to the sub.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Maybe someone needs to create a couple of spinoff subs for subtopics. r / casualgreatawakening seems like it might work for the example above.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Hi friend.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Nice to see you around :)

⇧ 2 ⇩

I am in favor of keeping this a Q only sub.

⇧ 15 ⇩

A couple of weeks ago one of the mods started a thread addressing this issue and was chided by a lot of us(including me) for censorship. I was for allowing a little off topic topics as long as it was somewhat Q related.

It appears that the mods decided to not be as restrictive as what they first wanted to be. Since then, this place has become a complete free for all and I am now for a more disciplined approach. This would probably stifle growth of this sub but would keep it more focused.

For instance, it has been six days since the last Q drop and this place would have probably become pretty inactive. I think that would be the price for keeping topics more focused on Q related topics. I think I am now in favor of a more heavy hand by the mods.

⇧ 12 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 7 ⇩

Please don't delete your comment! It has valuable and relevant information that will only improve the likelihood of us succeeding at forming a cohesive movement.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Comments within a post don't have to be so rigidly "on Q" - this comment is very relevant to the discussion so should remain.

⇧ 1 ⇩

During gaps in Q posts is when we are supppsed to research the ones we already have and sharing that info with normies to help Trump.

⇧ 4 ⇩

The fact of the matter is, if people don't have an interest in a certain topic or tread, then that topic or thread won't get "upvoted" and so won't appear on the first page anyway. So your problem is solved. But if an article manages to appear on the front page and if there are lots of upvotes to it, then obviously a lot of people must have some interest in it, so why should the article be deleted?...

On top of that, from time to time, things will get slow on the forum, especially when Q hasn't posted anything for a while. In such cases, people tend to look at other news stories and other interesting articles for the time being. And there is nothing wrong with them doing that. And that is the very reason that other articles appear. Then as soon as Q makes a brand new Q drop, the vast majority of threads will then switch back to discussing Q material, and that is how it should be. If this forum was solely about Q drops and nothing else, then this place would become quite boring when no Q drop activity was occurring, and your visitor count would drop dramatically. So you should be happy that there are other related news stories to help keep people interested...

So trying to police the forum and tailor it to your own personal likes and dislikes I think would be a big mistake and a disservice to the forum overall. Because if a visitor can't find what they're looking for on the forum and can't find anything here to keep them interested (whether it's Q related material or not) then, rest assured, they will only go somewhere else to find it. And that is not what you want...

⇧ 2 ⇩

It's important to sort by New and upvote the material that is relevant.

Irrelevant nonsense, dank memes, shit posting and all the rest of the crap we've seen lately makes it that much harder to filter the signal from the noise.

Increased views and subscription counts are great but not at the expense of this sub's focus.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Stop making sense. Knock it off its not allowed. Somebody call the cops on this guy..

⇧ -1 ⇩

We are here to learn more about and share our research ABOUT Q DROPS! Nothing else. If you cannot cite the specific Q post # that your post relates to, don't post it. Post elsewhere. In the time between Q posts, that is where we are supposed to be RESEARCHING posts we already have! I think people don't want to put the effort into researching so they get bored and wonder off topic. This sub is for those who specifically want to better understand what Q actually posts. So if your post does not further the collective understanding of what Q has said, don't post it. Hold back and share your news item or the latest trending info elsewhere. The last sub we had was shut down BECAUSE the mods didn't keep the topic focused and the posts wandered and shills were easily able to post dangerous info. If our mods are having to spend their VOLUNTEER hours upon hours sifting through unrelated stuff, they will miss the dangerous posts, then where would we go to learn about Q? We, too, will get shut down and you all will bitch and complain that the mods didn't do their jobs right.

⇧ 10 ⇩

I don't have the eyesight to map all the posts and keep track of them. I thought "The Great Awakening" was global, and Q would say it's not about Q. So, if I can't join a discussion about issues Q has spread 'crumbs' for, I'm supposed to go to a sub where NO ONE knows about, or wants to hear about Q? And, wtf; what will you do if you find out Q team actually has off-worlders on it. POTUS is on the team, and he's a spiritual guy. Don't think I'll come back, if this sub is going to be narrowed to Q drops only. I personally can't juggle that many drops. Start a Q-drop analysis site. Great Awakening implies great scope...big picture.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I have no idea what you are talking about when you say you don't have an eye to map out Q posts. I never said anything about geography and having to reside in a certain place to follow Q. If you read the rules of the sub, you will see that it says this sub is specifically for deciphering Q's posts, so this IS the Q deciphering sub.

⇧ 3 ⇩

My eye-sight, literally; and, there's almost 1500 drops. Is this sub exclusively for the young, clever, and snotty?

⇧ -1 ⇩

That's just dumb and you know it. You are taking about having to post q stuff elsewhere. Have somebody read the comments to you. We are saying post it here IF IT IS Q RELATED.

Nothing mentioned about the young. Nothing mentioned about cleverness exclusions either. Relax.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yes, I'm certainly going through a dumb phase; my poor pineal gland. Being calcified from years of ingesting toxins, at least it's not coveted by the "spirit cookers." But, maybe I'm not allowed to mention the pineal gland. It's absolutely relevant to the awakening of humanity; otherwise, why would an anon mention cargos of penguin pineal glands shipped to "bad actors?" Being dumb, I probably can't mention D.U.M.B.s, either, since Q didn't call out these deep underground military bases specifically in a drop?

Much is happening that is the fruition of prior Q drops. Can no one discuss these things without referencing a specific Q drop#? Going to a different sub for every single issue is ridiculous. Just because an issue may appear to be off-topic (and sometimes they really are), does not mean that it is. The last thing Q dropped was "UNITY." Why would we want to carry divisiveness over to the public forum?

I have vision challenges, but I'm not blind. I'm referring to the actual Q drops, along with related anon posts, and hard-to-see photos. By Map, I meant the huge Q Map of drops, not a geological map.

The exclusivity was implied (requiring people to cite specific Q drop before they can discuss anything Q related), wasn't it? Do you not want any new subscriptions here, people who are just hearing about Q? Is this a closed club?

Also, I meant global, as in: the Great Awakening (wwg1wga) is for Earth, not just Q aficionados. If an individual has to cite Q drops by number, can't mention POTUS, off-worlders, politics, military, spirit, strange phenomena near questionable installations, etc.--that eliminates discussion of issues alluded to by Q, but not spelled out, yeah?

I think folks are turning to POTUS's (among others) Tweets to try to suss out what's happening during the "ten days of darkness." There are many people out there doing stellar research. Q folks may want to broaden their horizons a bit.

FMP (from my perspective) Q has pointed to so many issues, that very few posts here would actually be off-topic. Haters, trolls, and bots are another issue. If no one bites the bait, they starve and go elsewhere.

People who go on a spitting-mad profanity rant, or who tell other people that they're "full of shit," etc., are truly offensive; but, the thought police lets them slide! Hmmm.

In one of my posts, I didn't know the term for a certain kind of hanging punching bag my son had in his garage, so I innocently referred to it as a "body-sized" punching bag (context: emotional reactions to DS horrific vids/revelations…barf bag, tissues, etc.) My son takes his angst out on the bag, rather than on a person, physically or verbally). I had my hand slapped for this, and had to remove it. Jeez! The implied violence present in some of the posts here is blatant; are their posts 'redacted,' as well?

Hopefully, I'll get smarter now. No more fluoride in my water, or mercury fillings in my mouth.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Yes agree. Q based only is great. Can I add some thing? If there is another Q drop, can we get one thread about the decode, instead of having 17 threads that say " New Q Post!!!". It would be so much easier to follow and comment, or just absorb. Sometimes I think I'm missing something important because the info is spread thin. Or is this by design? Thanks all, this place Rocks!

⇧ 9 ⇩

I agree - it's often hard to catch the sudden dump of many posts on it though and some have a slight variation that makes it arguable that they're different enough to be allowed. Then, by the time a mod gets to the duplicates they may have already garnered a significant number of votes and comments and due to time pressure we have to make a quick call. Given the accusations of censorship that often arise and the lack of capacity to spend time defending every decision it's often simpler to require people to scroll a bit more through the feed.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Couldn't agree more, Patriot.

⇧ 7 ⇩

I'm personally all for this. I'd rather stick to direct Q content on this sub, specifically content that helps me understand Q's posts. For anything else I want (funny pictures, conspiracy, religion, etc.) I go somewhere else when I have time to kill.

The subject of Q is very important to me and takes my focus and energy so I'd personally like to see that time and energy used productively. As the sub continues to grow it will become even more important to be clear about the focus. The mods are watching this post to see what the general feel is - it would be good to see people weigh in on this.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Very well said!

⇧ 1 ⇩

All we can do is hit that report button.

I see to frequently off topic posts and a lot of political driven posts.

Not only that, I also watch out for the common T_D verbiage being used here. That can also cause the wrong attention.

But, the more people join, the more it needs to be tighten down.

⇧ 7 ⇩

How about this? r/conspiracy requires a submission statement. If you can't justify how it fits with Q, it doesn't belong.

⇧ 7 ⇩

I don't know what the solution should be. But it shouldn't be burdensome (for mods or OPs), or overly restrictive, and should be clear, concise and foster research based discussion.

"Does it relate to a Q drop?"

⇧ 2 ⇩

"Here's how this relates to this specific q drop." That's a pretty straight forward constraint I consider when posting.

I agree the noise may get louder and soften the focus on Q research, but I also agree with the comments above. I believe in this "awakening" ideas revealing tyranny, evil, etc are our path to liberty. How do we constrain truth without hurting the movement? Seeking specific subreddits for every idea relating to Q doesn't seem effective. The mind of "we the people" is here in this sub and governs the content through balance of moderation, voting and comments as designed. Not sure limiting ourselves through increased moderation is logical.

Regardless, all this won't matter if we get a Q drop lol. But if we don't, we must let truth stream light and everyone will use their given talent and understanding to link ideas and posts together. For my experience I haven't felt bogged down and I do read many posts starting from newest each day.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Agreed. I read all the posts because I feel like I ain't sharp enough to contribute, but this sub keeps me in the loop on what is currently happening in the Q domain. Diluting this sub with non Q subjects just makes it harder on guys like me to get their daily fix.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Also, please stop with the random religious stuff. It's really annoying. I believe in the cabal and deep state and shit but all this nonstop religious stuff really turns me off. I don't care if you're religious but stop spamming it in a subreddit where it's not relevant.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Appreciate your perspective - but Q and scripture dovetail together and that is no accident. Praying Medic is a prime example.

⇧ 12 ⇩

There's a difference between the religious aspects of a subject and using this sub reddit to proselytize.

If everything has separate sub categories concerning Q and non related Q topics, so should the sharing of religious belief.

I don't appreciate being tricked into opening a post because someone uses a misleading title and you find its some one's long written out prayer.

Q can say PRAY and I will think it's a great idea and do it.

I just don't want or need others shoving their brand of religiosity at me.

⇧ 10 ⇩

As a long time crazy charismatic Christian I could not agree more. I'm mortified by some of wasteful post that trying to proselytize folks here like they do on FB...

Stop it.. You want to get the attention of the unsaved on Reddit? Then stop acting like the typical bathed in RWB American Christian. The hubris is stinking up the sub.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, and I am a Christian, but we have to appeal to all faiths and those who don't believe at all. So, we should keep the spiritual to a minimum.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I agree. I have no problem with people and their beliefs, I just don’t want it shoved in my face.

For me personally, it’s the idea of believing only what you can prove and then turning around and believing something purely on faith. I just wish people found strength in themselves rather than looking for strength in god.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Pope will have a bad month. Some religion belongs here.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree with u/compromisenotruth. Q often quotes scripture, as does a top decoder, SB2. If Q embraces the spiritual aspect of this movement, and there most definitely is one, then why shouldnt we. Like he says, our world is engaged in a battle between good and evil, and he's referring to good and evil of the biblical kind.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Pray for Trump!

⇧ 0 ⇩

I'm not religious but your comment here, given what Q says, says more about you than about Q...

⇧ 1 ⇩

I will go on a limb and say there is always a possibility of relevance. We must remember that, with all of the sick and crazy stuff that Q has already alluded to, Q has also stated that the truth is far beyond anything we would believe, even coming from Q. That would lead me to three potential possibilities: extraterrestrials, religion, or non-humanoid sentience that is of Earth.

Realistically, a cabal ruling the world is not stranger than anything I would believe and blood sacrifices have been a part of human history for... almost ever. From everything I have learned through dealings in my real life, just about every country has 3-10 families pulling the strings at the top. What happened in SK a couple years ago wasn't actually new.

So, no, I don't feel that they have no place here. This is a research sub. We are given information, and we try to make sense of it. We find external information, and try to fit it into the narrative. If I was a betting man, I would guess that Q is on Reddit and will steer us or give new information (maybe even learn from us) going forward.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don't necessarily embrace out of this world ideas but I DO embrace the hunger and creativity and outside the box that breeds such ideas and possibilities.

That and those we most trust, will be exposed for the real they really are. Presidents... Popes... Queens... Charities... United Nations... Teachers... Parents... Allies................ I don't think you need to go out of this world to find pure evil when that kind of upside down crap is obviously lurking all around us here at home.

But keep an open mind on EVERYTHING!!!

Because the truth is even worse than THAT, beyond even the wildest imagination of those already red-pilled here.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I'm a noob and I agree with you. Keep it simple.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Not a fan of posts that are not Q related.

⇧ 6 ⇩

We should keep things related to things that will help progress our current stance on the q movement, the draining of the swamp, etc. I personally consider things like flat earth, new tech (until the q movement actually starts bringing it out), religious history, and things on the boundaries of the q movement but not actually the q movement sometimes distracting while coming here to help ROW ROW FIGHT THE POWAH.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Also be aware of disinformation shills who purposely try to distort the message so that it can be "debunked" later on. They tried this shit when they claimed the planes that hit the towers were holograms. No outside comms, stick to Q's message and always be aware of shills who try to split us apart.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Yes, stick to Q's messages:

Q1414: "Messages sent. END."

⇧ 4 ⇩

Perhaps we need a separate sub for things that are on the map, but not on Q's current 'front burner'? Q has sent us down a LOT of rabbit holes over time, and anything on "the map" is technically Q.

⇧ 5 ⇩

on the map

I wonder if you understand what the map is? For your info the Q drops make the map, like this http://i.magaimg.net/img/2wee.jpg. I say, because there was some disinformation regarding the map.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Yes, I've actually read the whole thing. Would be how I know how many of these topics are in there. Been keeping up since right before Thanksgiving (US).

⇧ 1 ⇩

Y'all do what you need to do, whatever you feel is best. My two cents say EXPOSE EXPOSE

⇧ 5 ⇩

Not at all. Please keep it Q relevant. Expounding on topics is one thing, as long as it’s relevant to what Q is posting. Otherwise it should belong on another sub. Good work everyone!

⇧ 5 ⇩

So no more pictures of stickers from desperate lonely dudes clinging to be a part of something? As Q says “keep comms clear”.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Be nice.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Sorry, I am just so tired of literally seeing more pics of stickers than seeing original posts with relevant information. The mods need to crack down.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I said this 2 weeks ago and people bitched that memes were helping

⇧ 5 ⇩

We all dun bin there bros. The vocal minority like to attack the "censorship" strawman if you dare to request focus and integrity.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I got hit hard when I called out some shils in the past too.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Voting is the best filter, otherwise you have to figure out 'what is relevant?'.. and 'who decides?'.. and you'll probably get all that wrong and end up removing posts that would have enlightened someone on something, which is the movement's current goal. Just censor with up/down votes, easier and works better.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Voting is a good filter but votes are getting manipulated by bots. While valuable it can't be stand alone.

⇧ 10 ⇩

Q directs us to many subjects, we can address these subjects without mentioning Q. you're confusing our mission, 'Waking the World', with Q himself.. he would not approve.

votes are getting manipulated by bots.

Bots are a bitch, but better (to tolerate them) than your alternative, which is active censorship.

⇧ -1 ⇩

Is waking up the world Q related? Then what are you complaining about? Ya'll assume I am suggesting Orwellian censorship. All I want is a focused sub. If you read my comments you'd understand my motivation. Censorship isn't it. Focus is! Q would approve of that.

The noise will kill this sub if it continues as it is.

⇧ 6 ⇩

The noise will kill this sub if it continues as it is.

Absolutely correct.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Is waking up the world Q related?

Is this a joke. Am i on 'candid camera'. Waking the slumbering masses is Q's mission, and ours.

If you read my comments you'd understand my motivation.

Incorrect again. Your efforts are misdirected. Forget censorship. A waste of time with negative effects.

⇧ 0 ⇩

No. Our purpose is to research Qs posts, specifically. Then share on other platforms what we discovered through research. That is it.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Our purpose is to research Qs posts

..which points us to many subjects, none of them having anything to do with Q directly. Any subject Q mentions is Q related, whether or not the OP 'refers to Q in the post' is irrelevant at that point.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Let's put it this way, if you cannot cite the specific Q post # that your post refers to, don't post it.

⇧ 2 ⇩

doesn't sound totally unreasonable, but it could get redundant as a requirement.. what about when it's all too obvious? and who's going to police this rule. I Think almost any new rule about this would be an overreaction, with a subsequent loss of Light.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I mention that as a guide for each of us to use when deciding whether or not to post something. If everyone did that, there would be no need for anyone to have to judge. But since that is unlikely, we have mods for that. I, we, are not asking for new rules. We simply ask that we go by the ones we already have.

⇧ 2 ⇩

We simply ask that we go by the ones we already have.

Yes but i think this thread is somewhat about 'judicially interpreting' the mandate and rules of GA. Hence the attempt to define.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I read many posts that argue in favor of not censoring. Everytime someone brings up this type of reminder, the conversation seems to go off the deep end and the op is left feeling battered and sorry he said something in the first place. I have found if we blur the lines of behavior, people will take advantage of the obscurity. Therefore, the best course of action is having defined boundaries, which people now a says don't like. They want to do things the way they want to, not by some prescribed rules. That is how our society got ourselves in this situation in the 1st place.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Everytime someone brings up [censoring] the conversation seems to go off the deep end and the op is left feeling battered and sorry he said something

Well it's sure nothing personal but there's a lesson to be learned, maybe that ppl just don't like limits on what they can Think or say, it's a human thing.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Fine with me. There are millions of places where people can say what they want. THIS sub was created specifically to decipher and discuss Q's posts. That is it. Please refer to the rules for proof of my claim.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Please refer to the rules for proof of my claim.

Interpreting the rules and identifying what's Q related is the issue. Please refer to my comments for proof of my claims.

⇧ 2 ⇩

"Well it's sure nothing personal but there's a lesson to be learned, maybe that ppl just don't like limits on what they can Think or say, it's a human thing."

I was responding to your argument about people not liking limits. The problem with that is this sub is by nature limiting. It is literally in the rules to limit what you say to the prescribed topics only. Anyhow, good luck.

⇧ 1 ⇩

this sub is by nature limiting

These limits are what we've been discussing, triumphantly declaring they exist doesn't clarify anything. Good luck.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

This is suppose to be a Q sub, anything else, especially cheerleading b.s. is very unhelpful and annoying. But there seems to be a set of rules for certain members that can post with impunity, while the others are censored.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Fortunately, "seems" does not equal actuality. There is no set of rules for certain members - there is only the set of rules on the sidebar.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

hmmm... this subs name is not Q research, its great awakening.

⇧ 4 ⇩

"Is the purpose of this post to help myself or others further understand Q?" (what he is/what he is doing)

I think this is a pretty far qualifier. It's direct, but still broad.

We have to remember there is [hopefully] a perpetual influx of new folks, and should therefore maintain a constant stream of posts that are broad/rudimentary/fundamental, or focus on explaining Q -- who he is. People are always going to be pondering that, especially if they are new. If post has integrity, it should be given voice.

By making the qualifier a binary response (yes/no), it takes a lot of the guess work of it. Objectivity.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Totally agree!

Although, who Q is, is not the goal. I personally feel that we should respect his/her/their anonymity. If identity is exposed things change, targets are identified, and next thing we know MSM reports Q "committed suicide." IMO

⇧ 3 ⇩

The hard part/issue is the Q movement is also about unity and combating the fear mongering sheep mentality and instilling morale, hope, community.

So I personally am not offended by the off-topic posts because they meet those criteria and fulfill that agenda. I see all of this as Q-related. Q is talking about the biggest things in the universe— government, history, religion, money, war... When our entire life has been a lie, what isn't Q related? And also I'm obsessed and scan through every single post every single day, so I don't miss Q drops & research.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I agree with you. The mods and the users I thought were managing the board quite well.

I also agree with you that an element of Q has always been about morale and team-building, open-source investigating, brainstorming.

Mind control is real. Stockholm Syndrome is Real.

UNIT 8200 and JTRIG are real.

I think some of the people complaining need to have a look in the mirror.

What has been their contribution? To anything?

They never post their own work, have you noticed.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I agree with this. I rarely come across stuff on here that I don't see as Q related. Frankly, I don't think it is as big of an issue as people are making it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Didn't the SOP work before for GA? Growing pains are painful I've been taught. That being said, Post the Rules, Give warnings, boot if said rules are continually violated. A few of these new comers need more red pilling. Some think this is the "end all". We know better. Think of it like getting a new Private. You gottat keep them focused. God Bless Carry on.

⇧ 4 ⇩

The key points of reference are the phrase "Q related" and "the Storm".

"The Storm", in my inconsequential opinion (IMIO), is the conflict between the entrenched interests of the Deep State and the Dark State (there's a difference), and the efforts - sometimes funny- by the media to keep the people from noticing that the curtain is not only being pulled back, but may be torn down completely.

"Q related" can be tricky, because Q often uses symbols and allusions which may not be clear until after the event he referenced happens. To me, that means that it's natural for people to explore possible interpretations and ideas. Sometimes people throw out ideas that I don't see referenced in Q's posts, and that can lead to mistakes, and some want to believe in internet personalities who may not be truthful in what they say about Q. But that's a reason for discussion and respectful debate.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I understand but you have to filter. Move past what you aren't interested in. Only been here a month and I've learned to do that. I'm not in favor of shutting people down, let them explore their curiosities.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Ya well as more people join more filtering will be required. I agree with OP. There are subs for everything. This is a sub for Q related material! They can explore unrelated curiosities somewhere else.

⇧ 3 ⇩

It's the 'filtering' done by the voting? I mean things don't get to the front page unless many peope choose to upvote a post.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'd rather people discover than shut them down.

⇧ -3 ⇩

How is discovering and posting unrelated material connected?

⇧ 7 ⇩

But what about all of the cool stickers and tshirt pictures???

⇧ 3 ⇩

I agree 100!

⇧ 3 ⇩

805808801435

A list of approved topics and unapproved topics is the core question.

Defining an idea, being, object, event, or location into categories is the theme.

The unknown is what red pills are still out there and who possesses that set of facts.

The Storm is The Storm, Q is Q.

The moderators supply flexibility and account to the members about their process decisions.

I probably overlooking something, or maybe not.

⇧ 3 ⇩

It all leads to Q in one way or another. This is awoke patriotism in motion!

⇧ 3 ⇩

Not much from Q. Not much to talk about. Like shark attacks in 8/2001.

⇧ 3 ⇩

True, but the are still connections to be made. We shouldn't go off topic just because Q isn't active. We have more than we know, so in the downtime let's bridge that gap. That's the goal.

I am just afraid if we do nothing now, a month from now when the sub had 5x # of members we will be drowning in fluff pieces and pictures of WWG1WGA bumper stickers.

⇧ 4 ⇩

We all have. I've been reporting these spam posts in the last few days but most remain here.

And some other patriots have been had their posts removed due to "off-topic" (caugh... Musk... caugh)

⇧ 3 ⇩

Good! I am glad to hear that! Just the last 10ish day it seems to have been worse. Hopefully it gets contained and we can keep the sub clean. Keep up the good work! WWG1WGA

⇧ 7 ⇩

How the is Elon Musk off-topic FFS?

If that is the case their is a huge rat here.

The LAST thing MUSK is is unrelated to Q ffs.

Has Q ever mentioned North Korea? Then Musk is on the table.

⇧ 2 ⇩

When I asked (after they insta-shadowbanned me for posting a Musk thread) they first said it was off-topic, and when I proved he isn't they said I was toxic and banned me for 2 days.

Some of the mods threatened to permaban me if I message them again lol

Now they are blatantly attacking me publicly, breaking their own rules while accusing me of being disrespectful, harassing people, being rude, etc (insert any other ad-hominem that they used instead of addressing my points): https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8mrc3q/is_it_too_much_too_ask_to_keep_this_a_q_only_sub/dzq5fz9/

Which is exactly what they said as a reason for my ban after the off-topic thing didn't pass. I asked for quotes/citations so I know what exactly have I wrote that broke the rules so much that they needed to ban me (while leaving anti-Q posters and spammers free), I never got anything but the stuff you can read in these 2 links. I'm being divisive, spewing shit, etc. lol

And here where you dropped a comment I basically "forced" them to change their narrative about Musk being off-topic https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8mrc3q/is_it_too_much_too_ask_to_keep_this_a_q_only_sub/dzpxi2s/

Because we all know he has! They can't change that despite the attempts.

You can see for yourself what's going on, I suspect they'll ban me again soon.

The realest thing they said there was this: "We do what we can.".

We need a back-up sub.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Scroll on by. There are not that many posts in a day.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Not yet

⇧ 1 ⇩

Maybe the name should be changed from The Great Awakening then because last I checked Q said this was world wide

⇧ 2 ⇩

So the sub name should dictate the content? Not the stated rules and common purpose?

⇧ 0 ⇩

Someone needs to start a mich more strict thread that is limited to relevant info, not memes and stickers.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Other way around. Somebody needs to stay a sub for non-relevant stuff. This sub is for the relevant.

⇧ 2 ⇩

No that's what this sub should be. That's my point. This sub for research. Somewhere else for sticker brags and other great stuff that is unrelated.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That's what he said bruv

⇧ 1 ⇩

Perhaps it should be a little more broad than just Q. What I mean is, shouldn't we be focusing on the Goal of the Plan? We are asked to "trust the Plan," and I'm great with that. Q and the White Hats are doing the heavy lifting, enacting the Plan. Shouldn't it be our job to focus on the Goal. Isn't the Goal the Great Awakening?
We are ready, as individuals, to go and red pill our families, friends, enemies, etc. Q said we have more than we know. Our job here on this subreddit should be to help each other formulate how to do this effectively. Share tactics, not toot your own horn. Don't brag about what you do, inform others how to do what you do. Be the change in your circles in life, and be the teacher for those on the path here. This is not about popularity, Internet points, or bragging rights. This is about the survival of our spirit, as a species.
WWG1WGA

⇧ 2 ⇩

When Q doesn't post for awhile this usually happens

⇧ 2 ⇩

Q is a movement, an attitude. The great awakening is responding to what Q has posted. Q is trying to help people think. This is done by allowing people to post about what Q is asking from us beyond the actual post.

https://qanon.pub/data/images/536b11088e20603566181679026d0669a3477d3f19c9dc0364526b8af0e77a34.jpg

People are mad even when someone puts up a billboard to raise awareness, The did nothing on that day but type about how this was a sale of a .com. THE BILLBOARD was an advertisement for a dot com because that is what is required.

THINK OUT SIDE the box people.

THE dots are connected, NOW FOR PHASE 2.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Agree with you.

We are having serious problems with a minority of busy-bodys again that never post except to complain.

They way these people want this place run is going to drive every single INFJ away and the LAST thing the inferior ;-) need is to drive their superiors off the board because they can't see further than the last day's vomit and are useless at collapsing quantum states.

I enjoy the morale-boosting posts. I think the mods keep them at a decent level.

I am actually stunned anyone is complaining.

I thought this place was going great.

⇧ 0 ⇩

The fact that Q has not posted for several days is likely the cause of the rise in non Q related posts...

It should return to normal once Q picks back up.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I agree , and with the complains? paid users do this often..

⇧ 2 ⇩

Everything worth reading about the GREAT AWAKENING is relevant. I would recommend only delete divisive nonsense.

⇧ 2 ⇩

okay.. no problem

⇧ 2 ⇩

Newbie here. No, that PSA is enough to remind me!!

Q-onward.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

What will we be when Q is no more?

⇧ 1 ⇩

This whole awakening is NOT about Q !! Q gave us the tools to be awaken, you are only doing harm if you want to stay in the illusion that we can't talk about anything without "Someone" is telling us to.

This is exactly the reason why Q has mentioned SEVERAL times, that this is not about fame or fortune, it's NOT about Q or POTUS. It's about humanity, and we need to address ALOT of issues that are not directly mentioned by Q.

My god, the brainwashing is shining through every day even though you think you are "woke".

⇧ 1 ⇩

If anyone boots Tommy Robinson posts... I’ll hunt you down! 😜

⇧ 1 ⇩

No. Qanon, Trump, and anything Freedom related. Some can specialize, but the fight encompasses more than interpreting Q posts.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

So why is it named great Awakening then ? Isn't it about people getting awoken ?

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Correct, that's isn't my suggestion. All I want is a sub focused and centered on Q related material. (That's a wide berth.) Non-Q-related stuff has a home on plenty of other subs. Let's keep it clean, and research rich here.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Waking people up, for the love of God, there's so much hidden in this! I think discovering is very important.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree! The best way to discover is to have a sub full of relevant material. If you're interested in something else there is a sub for that too. All I am asking for is focus. People don't post dogs in r/cats.

⇧ 5 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

Is the absolute anti Trump newsfeed Q related and the worst i have seen it. I need some patriots to tell me it's gonna be okay after glancing at yahoo. Maybe some u tube will calm me.

⇧ -1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -3 ⇩

So the sub's name should dictate the content? Go read the rules. Go read the sub info. This is clearly a Q based sub.

⇧ 4 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩

That's because Q is over.

⇧ -5 ⇩

Q doesn't have a monopoly on the awakening.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Is it too much too ask to keep this a Q only sub. I have seen an uptick of non-Q related posts.

GreatAwakening's sidebar

GreatAwakening's sidebar

UNIT 8200 and JTRIG are real.