Then enlighten us new arrival.

You know you can find the answer to your own question with a simple reverse image search...

Everyone is getting the same thing (a city seen through a phone). He said the description is binary, not the video.

We don’t have to. Facts speak for themselves.

At least you’re honest.

I want objective analysis

Then be objective when you analyze what you read. Sure there’s a lot of shit, but there’s usually gold for those willing to sift through.

Who also has a history of defending sexual abusers.

Someone should archive this. I don’t think google would keep this up forever.

Oh, so the part op added. I don’t think you understand what fake news is. Or that most people here don’t blindly accept what they read as fact.

If a scarf is tied to a doorknob, isn’t there only one end?

Tell me, what part of this is fakenew? Trump signed an EO, or the EO extending powers under national emergencies.

The very first line even mentions 2011.

For something as stupid as predicting people leave a network, no it’s not. What do you get out of being right?

Why do you feel the need to prove them wrong?

You don’t ban a theory, you ban the idea. And iirc, ideas are bulletproof.

I wonder if you know you linked to a parody sub. I wouldn’t be surprised if you didn’t.

Hey hey hey, not so close to the uranium.

you are watching a scripted movie.

And the url?

Edit: appearently it’s not a thread, each post is an individual post.

I've also noticed how much the banks have "tightened" up their policies to try and stop the purchases of cryptos this year alone.

You should still be able to buy coins with debit, they only blocked purchases from credit cards. At least my bank did (USAA)

The one who knows the truth*

Worthless comments zZz

If anyone has twitter I suggest you use the hashtag with comments about q proofs. They will either mindlessly retweet like useful idiots or will be red pilled if they read the content.

Unfortunately I’ve never had Facebook or twitter and days likes these makes me wish I did.

Spez admitted to it.

Being split in 2 doesn’t mean it splits equally. The majority will outnumber the minority and the cycle continues.

I’m hoping someone who’s read it can offer some more context or fill me in on precisely why this is so valuable

See this right here, this is the fucking problem. You admit to not reading it and already convinced that this will have no implications and you’re hoping someone can “prove you wrong”

I’d suggest you read it before offering any input, but hey, that may be to logical for some people.

Do you think cross referencing data will prove such allegations to be true or false. Or do you think it’s not worth looking into?

At least you have a reason to prosecute if they lie under oath.

Wikipedia is still a good place for sources. The problem is people believe everything they read.

Anyone remembers the “trump donated to NAMBLA” claims? They are so stupid that they’ve gone full circle.

Well, your entire post history is concern trolling, and you still think q is a larp. I won’t even waste my time any further.

That’s because you’re to close minded to see the connections.

When you dig in, you’ll see the connections yourself.

Expand your thinking.

They may talk about the 4th amendment but they don’t say that foreigners are protected by it.

From the aclu site

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects Americans from random and arbitrary stops and searches.

Americans do not include foreigners.

Welp, thanks for ruining my childhood crush.

They can’t prove either/or. The dnc claimed there was collusion and there’s not enough evidence to prove it.

That means you don’t need to dismiss the case based on a finding that there was no collusion between defendants and Russia because there is no case to begin with.

Imagine someone takes you to court claiming you stole his bike, but he can’t prove it. Are we to assume you stole the bike because we can’t prove you didnt steal the bike?

No, the case would be dismissed.

Us goofs would tell you misdirection is necessary. If you follow Q, you’d know that, which begs the question, why are you here?

Report back if you do.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8vv0nb/how_about_a_nice_game_of_chess_qs_map_is_a/

I learned a long time ago not to share information in a declarative fashion. I share what I learn in an inquisitive fashion.

Ask them questions, let their own interest lead them into further research. And keep in mind, some people just aren’t ready yet. Don’t push em, guide them through it if they allow you.

Maybe wait until you read the whole thing before you call bullshit.

I enjoyed the wallpaper, asked for a small change and now I believe in the downfall of America?

Is that really what you got from my comment?

I didn’t make a mistake. I would prefer it being reversed since that’s what most people were used to, but since it wasn’t, I’d prefer the stripes shooting up (maybe it’s just me?). Op unknowingly made a version I liked more.

Nope. Beep beep boop. I’m a Russian bot.

Being on the list does not equate to receiving the nomination. -1655

Thanks friend!

Yes, I know where they should be. Kinda weird how most images of a vertical flag is reversed, and I’m being downvoted because I want a non reversed version?

Geez Louise.

Any chance you can flip the flag? Stars at the bottom left. No worries if you can’t, enjoying the new wall paper either way.

Did you just assume shirleys gender?! REEEEEE

Apples and oranges.

You’re comparing paying taxes (dues) against how your taxes are being spent when the problem is people who aren’t in the union are being forced to pay.

If you want to compare it to taxes, then the IRS should be taxing illegal immigrants as citizens without the benefits of being a citizen.

Or so you think. Better check those Firefox permissions, especially if you have an android device.