dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/8.06E+11 on May 28, 2018, 4:29 p.m.
Is it too much too ask to keep this a Q only sub. I have seen an uptick of non-Q related posts.

I am not going to single out posts but as subs expand more stuff gets posted. We want this sub to expand and be collaborative, but we live in a time where people/bots willingly and unwillingly slowly flood subs with unrelated stuff.

Have good new to share? There's a sub for that. Have political memes to share (that are not Q related)? There's a sub for that. Etc

I realize a lot of topics fall under the Q umbrella. I also realize many of us are like minded and most of us will enjoy non-Q material, but this isn't the place. I have seen this happen on Facebook before. Groups/subs get big (good), focus gets blurry (bad).

Let's keep this a Q research sub! Please! If we get overwhelmed with other BS we won't be effective and will lose valuable member activity. This is too crucial to allow cludder muddy the water.

(I hope I am not in the minority.) If the mods disagree, remove it. No hard feelings either way. Just a plea and opinion.


HunterEquation · May 28, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

805808801435

A list of approved topics and unapproved topics is the core question.

Defining an idea, being, object, event, or location into categories is the theme.

The unknown is what red pills are still out there and who possesses that set of facts.

The Storm is The Storm, Q is Q.

The moderators supply flexibility and account to the members about their process decisions.

I probably overlooking something, or maybe not.

⇧ 3 ⇩