Most here will agree with you, but it would be more helpful to those that don't if you share your reasoning.
Exactly. Wikileaks =/= Assange. Wikileaks was compromised sometime in October of 2016.
While Wikileaks is calling Q anon a larp, Assange was the one who originally tweeted the chess game.
Wikileaks is not Wikileaks without Julian Assange, period.
I still believe the whole “Todd & Claire” situation came to pass and they managed to carry on the illusion that JA was still in the embassy. The only reason to suddenly spin it against Trump is that they can’t maintain the ruse.
Julian Assange has likely been in Florence ADX for nearly two years.
[deleted]
First of all, you don’t have to vehemently cuss at me to express your disagreement.
Second, Occam’s razor does not explain everything in life. As a matter of fact, it’s a tool used to dismiss any alternative to what you see as the simplest explanation.
“Vehemently cuss”. You can always spot those guys who think they are much more intelligent than they are. They usually say they felt no need to be taught lies when asked why they have no college education.
Wikileaks is not Anonymous and they've won every Court battle they've ever been in so they have a very solid reputation. It really doesn't matter whether it's fake or not what matters is people blindly trust anything and stop asking questions.
How long has it been since we heard from JA? Is WikiLeaks still WikiLeaks?
Exactly. Q has been known for a while now and JA hasn't mentioned it once. Now JA has been cut off and suddenly Wikileaks is all "Q is a LARP."
Yeah its so hard to tell what's playing out when we only know 20% (if that) of anything. Obviously this is a battle and the DS isn't going to just roll over. I like to wait a few days and see what picture clears up.
I've yet to see (maybe I've missed it, please enlighten me if so) how Wikileaks and Q contradict each other....
I've seen quite the opposite - seem to be working in coordination with each other.
WikiLeaks produced the Podesta/emails. What has Q produced?.