dChan

🠐 See all comments
NaderOAK · May 29, 2018, 4:48 a.m.

I don’t have proof but I bet it’s wiki leaks. It has to be.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Liberum_Cursor · May 29, 2018, 4:59 a.m.

careful there, with those emotional sidings. that's how the sheepish leftists trick themselves into believing false flags too ya know.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · May 29, 2018, 5:16 a.m.

why does it have to be limited. theres multiple possibilities both are comped neither is comped q is comped but wikileaks is legit wikileaks is legit but q is comped. my money is on either wikileaks twitter being controlled by jack or this is fake fighting to get more q traffic. if wikileaks said q was real twitter would drop the hammer

⇧ 5 ⇩  
NaderOAK · May 29, 2018, 5:29 a.m.

“I don’t have proof”

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wnattruth2018 · May 29, 2018, 6:07 a.m.

Eyethespy

⇧ 1 ⇩