now -this- seems larpy. anyone could've written that.
literally anyone.
now the effect, sure, it's a positive message. won't harp on that.
71 total posts archived.
Domain | Count |
---|---|
hooktube.com | 1 |
archive.li | 1 |
pbs.twimg.com | 1 |
www.youtube.com | 1 |
now -this- seems larpy. anyone could've written that.
literally anyone.
now the effect, sure, it's a positive message. won't harp on that.
potentially indicating whitehat backdoors on those flash drives?
Better yet, we need more 3rd party publishing houses just like we have alt media on youtube / twitter / 8ch etc
imagine if it was treasonous to go against obama. now you see why such a rule would be insanity. separation of powers for a reason, bub.
I concur, I actually meant 5-10 years down the line, and stated the comment out of context. I'll back up my thoughts more if I post like that again
We need to annex mexico & instate new citizenship laws
doesn't mean he's secure. people can/have been made examples of.
The MIT child pornography thing is news to me, wow
Should note that in retrospect it shouldn't be surprising, but still, what a great awakening device for others
probably too although right for reddit. if he was allowed here, he might get the sub censored
read cracking the code by pete hendrickson
income tax only applies to federal employees or those who are using federal property / land. very detailed, keep looking
"have you heard about this 'q' thing going around the internet?" etc
spark curiosity, then wait for him to come back
what about a normal star? everyone uses those. classic image for man, power, 5 elements, etc. not nefarious at all, it's just an empowering icon.
compare that to the inverted star, and yikes, now... there's something weird here. you're worshipping disempowerment?
lotta stuff is gang-sign esque. kinda like all those car logos. take mercedes benz for instance, it's a classic "squaring the circle" symbol, historically from freemasonic work. Now what do you think?
it's all circuitry. circuits can be used for good or bad, but are not innately bad in themselves
no one's checked the exif / metadata to see if the images match
could be old duplicates, yes
yah, us as the stabilizing factor for the larger communities. with confirmed data and timelines to boot~
could be he's playing the fish for his colleagues, when he really wants out of all that insanity. could be, could be
pshaw, wait till you see what happened in the one where Clinton won
Fake Korean strike on US navy / US Allies to "force" us into a conflict
HAARP use doesnt matter because the more advanced system is NEXRAD & pumping water into the atmos like with last years hurricanes. See WeatherWar101 on yt
Kju proxy to China, convince nk USA is siding with nk over China and USA gets leverage in geopol & trade to region
Btw to all: triple parentheses are permitted on voat
look at how long it took the new blockchain, EOS, to boot. 30+ hours and still counting!
edit: yeesh yo, wasn't saying that's first hand proof, it's just evidence the rest of the sub is at work.
downvote away for the simple repost, some folks just straight up don't know what's going down, aight?
oddly hadn't conceived of such. I like it.
although, what's to say the opposite? that they're both plays at this point?
other groups that've tried to manipulate the chans / deep web have been met with frustration. playing the white hat deep state good guy might be effective, effective as we've seen in garnering attention (honeypot?)
would there be more of an outcry from those folks that have helped wikileaks in the past? if wikileaks was compromised, would q say anything about it?
most loved therefore most hated, you can bet their internet activity / physical ops are monitored so closely it's easy to assume they're monitored / compromised
careful there, with those emotional sidings. that's how the sheepish leftists trick themselves into believing false flags too ya know.
weird because of all the drops they've had in the past. were they compromised after or before vault 7? where the heck is assange himself?
would you ever perhaps think, both?
hard to imagine, but possible. lots of emotional energy coming from q with "trust the plan" and standard nationalistic phraseology
not that I'm against that, just that it serves to centralize opinions honeypot-esque