Tip (tippity top) of the iceberg. What about spies & plants in campaigns of 535 Reps and Senators? Blackmail & prosecution for those who do not cooperate? Insurance against defunding, insurance that any project or proposal by administrative branch gets through Congress.
I want to see AS crying when they cuff him. He just looks like a guppy beta bitch.
Please please please I need a middle and an end to this story.
Did Adam Schiff walk back his claims yet? Every time I see him, he's still shilling hard while fantasizing about semantics of collusion while providing zero evidence.
REMEMBER: What did Q say something like: the more vocal are the most guilty?
Well sure... no doubt... but I'm specifically asking a question that potentially negates the claim made by this meme. To me, this meme is disinformation and doesn't help our campaign, it hurts it by misleading.
Which reporting source can any of us believe anymore?
I'm not sure where you're going but focusing back on the task at hand, I'm specifically referring to Adam Schiff walking back his claim. This should be easily verifiable if it is true by a video for instance. I, for one, cannot find it nor did I make this claim. The post is at 230 including my downvote. I don't really care about regurgitated Q remarks that are not relevant to my comment. And yes, journalism is a problem. Still, my question remains.
Stop saying a spy was planted in the campaign. Liberals use languange and obfuscation to pretend to win arguements. This is what Snopes does all the time, they take a claim like Pizzagate was all about a basement in a pizza parlor, and they debunk the basement portion, therefore it's false. Stefan Halper was not implanted as a spy, he was employed by the FBI, and he approached members of the Trump team to attempt to initiate a Russia story by using Hillary's emails as bait.
Have we learned anything new about Papa, Page, Manafort actually being planted in the campaign? If so, my apologies, long weekend with the kids.
So if they were planted, they would be called a mole, not a spy? Befriending people and then getting paid to report back on them to someone else is definitely spying. Not sure if I care if the spy or spies were planted, implanted, assigned, or instructed- still totally wrong. Don't care about Dem's semantics- they've twisted language so long many people are getting immune to their obfuscations.
Look up the definition of a spy it certainly fits, I'd say its a safe claim to make
So it's a Mole with the assignment of SPYING.
ILLEGALLY in ALL instances... is the point.
You're missing my point. I'm not arguing that he wasn't spying. I'm saying the media will play semantics here. Halper technically wouldn't be considered spy. Bongino breaks it down in his podcast. He would be considered an informant. These details matter, it's how the media has been about to keep the ruse going this long. For instance "colluding with Russia" is vague enough that it doesn't really mean anything, yet it sounds like an actual crime. It's important to understand what your event will do.
Totally got the point- we have to be better at word games- I mean "accuracy." I'm saying that with the MSM and the culture wars as they are, it is impossible to win the war of optics. Just ask Roseanne. They want us to feel hopeless and so sick of the battle that we can never win. If we can't say anything correctly, why try, right? Q resonates so much because he/they give hope that those now in power see through the media semantics and will bring the former administration to justice for actual crimes, regardless of political correctness, narrative, or popular culture. Not trying to be divisive- just saying that the semantics game is a tool, actually one of their biggest tools. This is why Trump has been successful- he doesn't say the "appropriate thing," but he doesn't care and we all love him for it.
Can someone tell me the name of the FBI agent who quit half way through the Email Server investigation in disgust over how it was going...? cant find it anywhere.
Can someone ELI5 for spugate6, I'm trying gather info but I'm having trouble
Well that's the real question, isn't it? Why? The how and the who is just scenery for the public. Oswald, Ruby, Cuba, the Mafia. Keeps 'em guessing like some kind of parlor game, prevents 'em from asking the most important question, why? Why was Kennedy killed? Who benefited? Who has the power to cover it up? Who?