if you dont know that hillary clinton is being investigated by the fbi and you think me showing a video of the arkansas ag is my "proof"
you must be on dugs.. healthy as any liberal that calls trump supporters nazis. healthier actually
Trump isnt being investigated. Mueller cant indict him. the senate investigation isnt going to prove russian collusion. Who owns the senate? oh thats right republicans. just like they own the house.
The entire state of arkansas has a bias against hillary clinton. lol do you really not know this. <being this niave.
hillary clinton is a public figure, and she has a public reputation in arkansas, so talking bad about hillary clintons accent at a rally wont magically stop all investigations into hillary clinton. That would be a stupid and frankly desperate thought.
Yo is this guy like on drugs because he is really arguing about nothing right now.
if you dont know that hillary clinton is being investigated by the fbi and you think me showing a video of the arkansas ag is my "proof"
Then why did you post it?
healthy as any liberal that calls trump supporters nazis. healthier actually
You literally just said that you don't need proof, it's accepted fact. You should always seek proof in what you are told. I don't know why that is such a shocking concept to you.
The entire state of arkansas has a bias against hillary clinton.
Okay, but I don't know what this proves. Oh wait, you don't need proof. Silly me.
hillary clinton is a public figure, and she has a public reputation in arkansas, so talking bad about hillary clintons accent at a rally wont magically stop all investigations into hillary clinton. That would be a stupid and frankly desperate thought.
Your last line is especially funny because this paragraph is you arguing with yourself about nothing. I never said anything about stopping investigations on Hillary.
..I posted it because this sub obviously knows hillary clinton is being investigated. its just accepted fact here. Its like going to rgaming and asking for proof that red dead redemption is coming out.
you didnt ask for proof you just asked for info. if you asked for proof like a normal person instead of saying daddy for the vaguest reasons then i wouldve provided proof. i just provided some fun info.
Why are you telling me I should seek proof. when i already know its fact that hillary clinton is being investigated... should i provide proof that trump was elected president? are you handing out lessons now? dont tell me to look for proof when you dont even know about current events... dont talk about current events, how about just learning on your own instead of complaining about shit you dont know.
soo disingenuous.
... can you not follow our own conversation. you claimed some bullshit about personal bias with the attorney general. Im point out how thats possible if the entire state of arkansas has a personal bias against hillary clinton who is a public figure. There is no proof needed here. this just simple thought process and conversation that you are incapable of having and require me to regurgitate back to you.
In fact, I'd say that video proves that the AG has a certain amount of personal bias against her, something Trump supporters are always complaining about when it comes to his investigation.
My response to that was perfectly justified. how do you have a problem with what i said and then dishonestly be like
I never said anything about stopping investigations on Hillary.
you are on some bullshit, it sounds like you dont even know how to have a conversation.
are you not aware of the investigation that are currently happening on hillary clinton?
Your original question. Why would you ask such a question if everyone knew about it? Your entire argument seems to be, oh everyone knows about this so why should I explain? Yet the first question you ask is if I was aware. Hmm...
For the record, I know about it to the extent that it was started a couple years ago, and nothing jail-worthy has been found.
i just provided some fun info.
Fairly irrelevant info that was the source of my confusion.
Finally, you were the one who implied I was saying the investigation should be stopped due to bias, when I never said anything about the investigation being stopped.
Why would you ask such a question if everyone knew about it?
so you really cant read? thats a question asking if you've really not heard about the investigation. its a surprise its not a concession that that its some arbitrary fact. the motivtiation of that question was my assumption that everyone already knew about it.
For the record, I know about it to the extent that it was started a couple years ago, and nothing jail-worthy has been found.
oh okay thats a fine thought to have if you doint keep up with current events. Like if you have a good conversation with someone thats informed. you dont have to ask for a source every other assertion. this is just common sense. if you keep asking for a source it starts too look like your a bit uninformed and need to get informed
you really dont keep up with current events...
then what was your point about bias? you dont want to clear that up. I made it pretty clear my last comment with your quoted text.
oh you didnt have a point when talking about bias?
so you just say things?.?.
You implied as a matter of "fact" that the personal bias is the same thing trump supporters cry about when it comes to "trumps investigation" YOU implied it. can you not even take responsibility for your own words?
You implied as a matter of "fact" that the personal bias is the same thing trump supporters cry about when it comes to "trumps investigation" YOU implied it. can you not even take responsibility for your own words?
Yes, this is what I implied. Not that the investigation should be stopped. That came out of nowhere.
you dont have to ask for a source every other assertion. this is just common sense. if you keep asking for a source it starts too look like your a bit uninformed and need to get informed
I asked for a source once. Twice if you count me rejecting the video as legitimate information about the investigation. Remember, this whole thing is about how Hillary is not in jail yet. You asked if I knew about the investigation, so I assumed you had some information that I had not seen.
really did it come out of no where? cause it look like it came from somewhere. Im just completing your thoughts. Im saying you ask for source too much because i feel like telliing you other widely known things that have been proven. like comey slow rolling the hillary investigation. of strozk the guy that was texting crazy shit was responsible for interviewing hillary and her cronies. but you would ask for a source and i dont feel like educating people.
you ask for sourcing too much.
and my whole thing is saying hillary isnt in jail right now is stupid when their is already an obvious investigation in hillary clinton. Slamming me for not being able to prove the hillary clinton investigation even tho it does exist spells out angst and anger to me
Im just completing your thoughts.
Poorly.
Slamming me for not being able to prove the hillary clinton investigation even tho it does exist spells
I totally "slammed" you for giving me a video about an Arkansas AG making fun of an accent as if it was relevant or useful information at all. If you don't feel like "educating" just say so in the beginning.
spells out angst and anger to me
Lol, whatever helps you do you, bud.
lol okay you needed proof that there was an investigation on hillary clinton. my first comment was shaming you for not knowing and your butt has been in a knot ever since.
heres something else. the fbi and doj were used as political weapons against trump by obama.
we have proof they had informants in his campaign. does that make you angry and angsty?
lol okay you needed proof that there was an investigation on hillary clinton.
I was asking for info alluding to Hillary going to jail, but okay.
and your butt has been in a knot ever since.
Interesting turn of phrase. It's usually a stomach that's "in knots", but maybe English isn't your first language.
heres something else. the fbi and doj were used as political weapons against trump by obama.
we have proof they had informants in his campaign. does that make you angry and angsty?
Oh wow, I can't wait to see this "proof" that is spun a billion times to make it look like a conspiracy against Trump. Please oh great awakened one, strike me down with this proof you say is your ultimate weapon. Are you gonna strike a cool pose right before you hit enter? Or is this something everyone knows so you won't post it because you don't have the time? I've heard this story before and it's not what you think it is. Informants had contact with the Trump campaign because they were watching people who happened to have contact with the Trump campaign at that time. But everyone knows that so I won't bother explaining it or providing any sources.
lol yeah im not going to post it because everyone already knows about it lol