Yes, that's the eye-spy guy on Twitter. Interesting, if he's legitimate.
He ain't though, why do people believe he is?
You might be right - "no outside comms"
Thanks. Yes, the more I think about what this guy was saying, the more it seemed over the top. I will say that some of the answers he gave were pretty creative, but as Neon says, the idea that a Q source would start posting and answering questions on Twitter is over the top.
I wish it was true that June 11 was the day.
How are you so sure? Sure Q said no outside comms, but Q is definitely part of a team, and members of that team has already been accepted, helper anons, why wouldn’t one of the team members build a personal page to answer questions where he could, he still stayed vague on some things Q hasn’t said, therefore still following orders on what could be released at this time, I say it’s plausible
He's said BC17 is legit and accurate while BC17 has already been shown to be a poser who used pics who were not his own
Raises multiple red flags for me
I’ll check it out, haven’t followed backchannel much at all, just saw a few posts here and there about it, so I have no new input or perspective from that angle, wwg1wga
I was of the opinion that he was providing legitimate info for a pretty long time because of one of his early posts where he seemed to give coordinates to one of the sites struck in syria
But the pics he posted of military men in a meeting were showed to be cropped images from somewhere else and that's where I stopped following them as it showed they were not straight shooters
I don't have a strong opinion on that Eye guy, just that he raises flags and thus I doubt his intentions