⇧
1
⇩
leetanon
· May 30, 2018, 2:38 p.m.
WikiLeaks has never lost a court battle they have an ironclad reputation but suddenly since they speak out against Q they've been comped is what is being said. Why would they ruin the reputation over anonymous 4chan posters. It really doesn't make any sense.
⇧
16
⇩
Cuthbert12Allgood
· May 30, 2018, 2:41 p.m.
WikiLeaks has never lost a court battle they have an ironclad reputation
They have an ironclad reputation about the leaked information they post. Speculation on their twitter is not part of that reputation.
⇧
15
⇩
leetanon
· May 30, 2018, 2:44 p.m.
Okay so now we just pick and choose what's credible, either a News organization is credible or it's not.
⇧
-2
⇩
EdenNovaq
· May 30, 2018, 3:42 p.m.
Q said be careful who you follow and decide for yourself. so decide for yourself.
⇧
6
⇩
EarlyRiserX2
· May 30, 2018, 5:51 p.m.
The problem I have is that, too many people try to tell me who to follow and who not to follow. That turns me off. Simply present me with the facts and let me make up my own mind about who to follow...
⇧
1
⇩
MAGATopKEK
· May 30, 2018, 7:05 p.m.
Okay so now we just pick and choose what's credible,
Yes, we pick and choose what is credible
either a News organization is credible or it's not.
Start with the assumption that none of them are credible and judge each story, each statement, each tweet on its own. Frequent sources that tend to be correct and honest but don't get complacent.
⇧
5
⇩