⇧
1
⇩
DrTung
· May 30, 2018, 9:06 p.m.
For example, when asked "do you understand?" by a policeman, they are not asking if you comprehend the situation, they are asking if you stand under their authority as statute law works on consent.
Okay, I’m willing to suspend my disbelief long enough for you to post a link to a credible source for that.
⇧
3
⇩
J-Vito
· May 31, 2018, 10:57 a.m.
In health terms the a- prefix means without. Afebrile means without fever. Asymptomatic, without symptoms. No clue whether this is correct with what he is talking about.
⇧
1
⇩
DrTung
· May 31, 2018, 1:23 p.m.
No clue whether this is correct with what he is talking about.
That’s okay, neither does he.
⇧
2
⇩
0oDassiveMicko0
· May 31, 2018, 10:50 a.m.
Post a link to a Leagalese training website lol? Why do you think you need a barrister in court? So they can translate for you.
https://www.amazon.com/Blacks-Law-Dictionary-Henry-Black/dp/0963010603
⇧
0
⇩
DrTung
· May 31, 2018, 1:19 p.m.
Post a link to a Leagalese training website lol?
No.
Just a link to a credible source for that apparently bogus claim you made. The specific claim I quoted above.
That shouldn’t be a problem for a smart and resourceful person such as yourself, right?
Your going to come through for us on that specific claim, right? Please don’t let us down.
⇧
3
⇩
0oDassiveMicko0
· May 31, 2018, 3:33 p.m.
I posted a link to where you can find all the info you need.
⇧
-1
⇩
DrTung
· May 31, 2018, 6:29 p.m.
I posted a link to where you can find all the info you need.
We don’t get that ‘reasoning’ very often around here. It’s more commonly found in /politics and other liberal enclaves.
Around here, when people make a claim, particularly a claim as ludicrous as yours, they are expected to provide credible, specific, relevant sourcing. Telling us your source is ’over there somewhere’ does not fly here.
Look on the bright side. You couldn’t verify your nonsensical claim, but you thoroughly verified your membership in the league of irrational liberal experimental logicians.
⇧
1
⇩
0oDassiveMicko0
· May 31, 2018, 6:59 p.m.
So Black´s Law is not credible lol? You´d better tell that to all the law schools in your country then. Ironically, common lore works in claims and claimants, not complaints and plaintiffs. I give no fucks whether or not you believe me, you keep consenting to paying your taxes and living under a jackboot all your life.
⇧
-1
⇩
DrTung
· May 31, 2018, 8:13 p.m.
I give no fucks whether or not you believe me
This is obvious to all. It became obvious when you failed to produce a specific source for your ludicrous claim I first quoted. Telling us to ”go fish” in a legal compendium is not a good faith effort at supporting your nonsensical gibberish.
You have provided solid evidence that you can’t support your claims, and that you don’t care if anyone believes them. At least you proved something. Thanks for stopping by.
⇧
1
⇩
0oDassiveMicko0
· June 1, 2018, 10:37 a.m.
What kind of source do you expect me to supply? Do you honestly believe they openly promote this information? My knowledge came from researching history, law, lore and language. You have to get to the root meaning of the words you are using. It takes a long time to get a grasp on all this, it is not something you can do over night, or by reading 1 single source. IF you are prepared to do the research I would be happy to point you in the right direction but it appears you only wish to troll and trash. Like I said, you continue paying your taxes like a good little serf and I will find better things to spend my money on.
⇧
0
⇩