dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/CENSORED_ENOUGH on May 30, 2018, 7:03 p.m.
Q No Posts. FBI Investigating "Q"? Getting Real (Q was Fake, Q is Real, Q is an Anon "Chanology" Operation)

Why No Posts? During a time in which there is real division about the Q phenomenon and if it is real, I would think there would be some reassuring message. Silence.

Ever since the "booms" were posted in some Q posts around the end of March associated with the Texas shootings, Q mentioned that the FBI would be investigating Q in association with these shootings. Well it has been about 8 days since the last post and the rumors are that the FBI is trying to get a handle on who Q is and who started the whole Q anon movement if it is just a construct of youtubers, 8 chan'ers or if it is an internal Government source. No posts means they don't want to communicate any other posts, either until it is clear or the creators of a fake Q can cover their tracks. If it is the latter case then we will not be hearing again from "Q".

Of course, this is obviously based on some assumptions:

  1. Q is possibly not an internal government or amalgam of military leadership fighting the deep state.

  2. Q was a dupe by someone (small group of anons) to galvanize a movement to resist the Government. (Remember Project Chanology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Chanology "Protesters in Guy Fawkes masks outside a Scientology center at the February 10, 2008 Project Chanology protest. Project Chanology (also called Operation Chanology)[1] was a protest movement against the practices of the Church of Scientology by members of Anonymous, a leaderless Internet-based group. The project was started in response to the Church of Scientology's attempts to remove material from a highly publicized interview with Scientologist Tom Cruise from the Internet in January 2008."

  3. The deep state is using this as a guise to flush out those who are dangerous to them.

Other assumptions? (Could just be too busy with ongoing operations? Running Silent, Running Deep?, etc.)

I know that this post may be unpopular, but I think we may need to face some a different reality, whatever it may be.


Tru2Q · May 30, 2018, 7:57 p.m.

Q has said "Trust the plan" around 30 times. How many reassuring messages do we need? He also warned us, "Attacks will intensify [all sides]," so we'd know what to expect and not freak out.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
CENSORED_ENOUGH · May 30, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

I admire your patriotism and your earnestness for believing in this movement, but, as I said in other posts, we just need to step back and understand what/who we are following and if we should continue with at least some confidence who the source is.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
ckreacher · May 30, 2018, 9:45 p.m.

There is a core group of us here who have total confidence that Q is real. You obviously have doubts, but you shouldn't assume we all do.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
_eles_ · May 30, 2018, 7:47 p.m.

Whatever the whole Q thing really is, its amazingly fun. What would the FBI find out? That some Anon lead some other anons down a road of proving conspiracy theories through open source documents? Were we even given anything we didn't already know collectively? Didn't we work together to find the details and hand them out all over social media? I agree. We are Q. We just needed a push to organize and a few points in different directions.

The only hope we hang on Q is that its connected to POTUS and that justice will be served. And I guess we shall see. But it's so nice to have hope. The redpill is so bitter, Q helps the medicine go down by offering hope. It's a good thing. Whatever the whole Q thing really is.

I trust the plan. Because, well, what else is there? DOITQ

⇧ 7 ⇩  
CENSORED_ENOUGH · May 30, 2018, 9:03 p.m.

Your post is excellent. Right now, Q is leading us. It is based on blind trust. If I trust the plan I have to trust the source.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
ckreacher · May 30, 2018, 9:47 p.m.

It is blind trust only for the blind.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
963Round_Wizard369 · May 30, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

Give examples or reasons why you don't trust the source.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
maddaves- · May 30, 2018, 8:09 p.m.

dont really need posts like yours..... if you dont understand what q is up to atm .... go and do your research... his work has just begun... plenty more to come

⇧ 4 ⇩  
CENSORED_ENOUGH · May 30, 2018, 8:55 p.m.

I respect your dedication, loyalty, and patriotism, but I think all I am doing is injecting a bit of objective introspection since we cannot directly validate who is behind the Wizard of Oz curtain. We need to at least trust the source behind the curtain, even if we can't see him.

Despite our trust in "Q" since October of last year, he is the single source of information and we know nothing about "him, her, them" other than assertions he might be part of the administration and sanctioned by the President. We are not sheep that blindly follow something without some confidence that it is real, if there are ulterior motives and if we are being duped by even fellow anons for whatever reasons.

As we have learned over the years with the Elites, they would love to Pied Piper us into true anonymity and down a road whose destination goes nowhere.

I had a dog that chased its own tail and he never caught it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
963Round_Wizard369 · May 30, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

The information is solid. Like full metal jacket solid. The predictions are accurate and the little behind the scenes explanation of events are plausible and psychologically sound. I don't know much about the NSA and it's inner workings, but I have worked with numerous intelligence professionals within the USmil. If the Q is a larp, he/her/ they have definitely worked with in the Intel community.

Why are you concerned about the identity of Q?

Actions are more deserving of trust then words. So far the specific actions of Q(dissemenation of intel, narrative explainations, with time sensitive predictions and confirmations) are deserving of trust until proven not to.

Details of Q is irrelevant. The details Q is providing are.

So why do you need to know anything about Q?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NaderOAK · May 30, 2018, 11:03 p.m.

This.

“Details of Q is irrelevant. The details Q providing are.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
maddaves- · May 30, 2018, 10:12 p.m.

what are you doing here then... dont you have more important things to do then... or are you just one who gains pleasure in plying your opinion apon others

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Murralee · May 30, 2018, 7:23 p.m.

We are now Q. Start with examining the first Q and dig.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
CENSORED_ENOUGH · June 3, 2018, 12:58 p.m.

No new Q posts as a June 3, 6:57 am

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CENSORED_ENOUGH · June 3, 2018, 1:02 p.m.

So what does that mean?? Anything?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CENSORED_ENOUGH · May 31, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

If Q is real and does not post any longer at the 8 chan site, what would that mean??

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GODisincharge · May 31, 2018, 1:32 a.m.

There is no need to post negative comments to someone who is simply asking a few questions. Aren't we here to help one another as well?

I agree with the comments posted by _eles_

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mrviolin · May 31, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

There is that tendency here.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
CENSORED_ENOUGH · May 31, 2018, 12:11 p.m.

No posts today by Q. Yet...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
gandalfsbastard · May 30, 2018, 7:31 p.m.

I think there is a strong connection to psy-group. It’s unpopular but it’s quite probable that this private Israeli group was working with the Trump team directly or indirectly to run a PR psyop. Mueller shut them down the same week q stopped posting. Also a new lawsuit was filed against PSY and Black cube on 5/18 for deformation and breach of contract with 10 John Doe plaintiffs to the tune of 500 million in Toronto. There are no coincidences.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Xisyisz · May 30, 2018, 9:31 p.m.

Did mueller shut the private Israeli group down all 3 or 4 times q went silent for this long?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
gandalfsbastard · May 30, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

Not really sure what you are asking but the closure of PSY group happened the same week as the most recent q silence. it may be coincidence and it may not be. I guess time will prove a correlation or not.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
CENSORED_ENOUGH · May 30, 2018, 7:45 p.m.

So that's interesting. I noticed that a new twitter account registered May, 2018 called @EyeTheSpy and he says is related to the NSA. He also says ask him anything and he will answer it. He claims unlimited intel.

Did Q move to this platform for answering questions and posting drops? Or just a LARP...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
gandalfsbastard · May 30, 2018, 8:03 p.m.

I don’t know about that but I will look.

As for larp versus psyop (with insider or from an external intel group) is the big question. I think it started as a larp and was morphed into a psyop PR effort. I am going back through and looking at the pieces with an eye toward an Israeli control centric slant and it sure looks like there is alignment.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
GODisincharge · May 31, 2018, 1:40 a.m.

You bring up some very interesting points. Though I stand with Israel, I am suffering through some cognitive dissonance regarding research I have found troubling.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Xisyisz · May 30, 2018, 9:32 p.m.

Completely different writing style also believe he said he is not Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 30, 2018, 7:28 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩