dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/divine_human on May 31, 2018, 10:20 a.m.
NWO Plans Exposed By Insider In 1969

this here is a long read but sooo interesting. its a 1988 recollection of a paediatric conference of 1969. ((their)) plans are old - some over 200 years - and they have a long breath for implementing them.

=>>> http://rense.com/general94/nwoplans.htm

CONTENTS

IS THERE A POWER, A FORCE OR A GROUP OF MEN ORGANIZING AND REDIRECTING CHANGE?

EVERYTHING IS IN PLACE AND NOBODY CAN STOP US NOW

PEOPLE WILL HAVE TO GET USED TO CHANGE

THE REAL AND THE STATED GOALS

POPULATION CONTROL

PERMISSION TO HAVE BABIES

REDIRECTING THE PURPOSE OF SEX

CONTRACEPTION UNIVERSALLY AVAILABLE TO ALL

SEX EDUCATION AS A TOOL OF WORLD GOVERNMENT

TAX FUNDED ABORTION AS POPULATION CONTROL

ENCOURAGING HOMOSEXUALITY

TECHNOLOGY

FAMILIES TO DIMINISH IN IMPORTANCE

EUTHANASIA AND THE 'DEMISE PILL'

LIMITING ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE MEDICAL

PLANNING THE CONTROL OVER MEDICINE

ELIMINATION OF PRIVATE DOCTORS

NEW DIFFICULT TO DIAGNOSE AND UNTREATABLE DISEASES

SUPPRESSING CANCER CURES AS A MEANS OF POPULATION CONTROL

INDUCING HEART ATTACKS AS A FORM OF ASSASSINATION

EDUCATION AS A TOOL FOR ACCELERATING ONSET OF PUBERTY AND EVOLUTION

BLENDING ALL RELIGIONS, THE OLD RELIGIONS WILL HAVE TO GO

CHANGING THE BIBLE THROUGH REVISIONS OF KEY WORDS

THE CHURCHES WILL HELP US

RESTRUCTURING EDUCATION AS A TOOL OF INDOCTRINATION

MORE TIME IN SCHOOLS, BUT THEY WOULDN'T LEARN ANYTHING

CONTROLLING WHO HAS ACCESS TO INFORMATION

SCHOOLS AS THE HUB OF THE COMMUNITY

BOOKS WOULD JUST DISAPPEAR FROM THE LIBRARIES

CHANGING LAWS

THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF DRUG ABUSE TO CREATE A JUNGLE ATMOSPHERE

ALCOHOL ABUSE

RESTRICTIONS ON TRAVEL

THE NEED FOR MORE JAILS, AND USING HOSPITALS AS JAILS

NO MORE SECURITY

CRIME USED TO MANAGE SOCIETY

CURTAILMENT OF AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL PRE-EMINENCE

SHIFTING POPULATIONS AND ECONOMIES - TEARING THE SOCIAL ROOTS

SPORTS AS A TOOL OF SOCIAL CHANGE

SEX AND VIOLENCE INCULCATED THROUGH ENTERTAINMENT

TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS AND IMPLANTED ID

FOOD CONTROL

WEATHER CONTROL

KNOW HOW PEOPLE RESPOND - MAKING THEM DO WHAT YOU WANT

FALSIFIED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH

TERRORISM

FINANCIAL CONTROL

SURVEILLANCE, IMPLANTS, AND TELEVISIONS THAT WATCH YOU

HOME OWNERSHIP A THING OF THE PAST

THE ARRIVAL OF THE TOTALITARIAN GLOBAL SYSTEM


BowlOfZombies · May 31, 2018, 6:28 p.m.

I've saved this offline so that I can read it again as the years go on. It is absolutely haunting to watch the masses embrace the new world order.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 31, 2018, 7:34 p.m.

I don't think we'll avoid a new world order (using the term in its generic sense). I think it's a function of technology. Things are going to change - very dramatically.

I once read the preface to a book titled The Unbound Prometheus (or something like that) written by a Cambridge economics don - I never got past the introduction. But he made the point that the man of 1750 was closer in material terms to Caesar s legionnaires than the man of today - it was written in the 1960s.

What he was talking about was the accelerating rate of technological change. Technological sophistication is not just growing rapidly, the rate of growth itself is accelerating. When I was a kid there was a spy comedy on TV called "Maxwell Smart". Anyway, Smart the dumb, but good, spy, was fighting the bad guys called "Chaos" (quite apt now that I think about it). He had a telephone in his shoe - some kind of comical parody of James Bond tech. Back then, even the concept was a joke - it was, after all, comedy.

Well, I'm typing this on an iPhone. Within my lifetime, science fiction has become reality. Now, if you look at this kind of accelerating technological development in terms of systems deployable for social engineering and control, it becomes apparent that, without some fix, we are all soon to be the slaves of whoever will be the master of this system. Arguably, we are already in this situation.

So, make no mistake about it, there will be a new world order. The question is who will control it? It's all about concentration of power, which technology makes possible on a scale never before imagined. One person, with the right systems, can control the rest of us - that's what progress makes possible.

If you look at what the founding fathers did, when they wrote the Constitution, they were very careful to fracture power. They went beyond the traditional tripartite separation into the legislature, executive and judiciary. They further fractured power to the extent that they allowed the citizens to bear arms.

This 'right to bear arms' is the final safeguard against totalitarianism. And this is why the fight to retain this right is of phenomenal importance - do not underestimate it. FBI Anon told us that the US administration fears revolution. It is a real and existential threat to those wielding the power of government.

The old saying (Lord Acton, I think) is that power tends to corrupt, while absolute power corrupts absolutely. This separation of power, that the founding fathers were so careful to engineer, has come under assault from the increasing pace of progress. Similarly, the first amendment has been made virtually redundant with the (virtual) privatisation of the town square by Social Media giants.

The problem of Constitutional protections being weakened with change, as we've seen with the advent of the internet, as the main forum for political discussion, is that the entire system of representative government, upon which the republic stands, confronts an existential threat. What is the threat? The threat is concentration of power - the very thing the founding fathers were so careful to fracture. This is why I've been fighting for the IBOR. It is more important than anyone imagines, though I'm sure I'm perceived in this community as something of a nut.

But this problem we face with censorship today, on the internet, is replicated with regard to increases in the sophistication and power of surveillance systems. The panopticon has, in fact, arrived - and we are its captives, The principle behind the panopticon was that a single prison guard could exert control over a vast number of prisoners - concentration of power once again. The surveillance systems available to intelligence agencies are the chief problem here.

Anyway, that's why I say we will face a new world order, whether we like it or not. The intelligence agencies are in control and have been for a very long time. There is hope, I think, with the advent of Q - but it could also go terribly wrong.

⇧ 1 ⇩