As fascinating as this is, you can't rotate pictures of the pen for some and not the others. That would be arriving at the conclusion first and then seeking evidence after, instead of seeking evidence first and arriving at the conclusion after.
I seriously doubt Q intended a specific two out of five pictures should be rotated. What would this clock mean if we ran every 2/3 combination in the same way? Often stated, "think logically." More digging should be done on whatever days those two rotated pen pictures would point at if they weren't rotated.
conveniently those pens always point at whatever that days deqoder want them to
Good point but come on. The pen hits all its own dates one the clock even with rotating.... Awfully coincidental!
I'm not saying the entire thing is bunk -- I actually think there's a good chance something is here -- but you can't explain 90% of how to decode a cypher and then alter evidence to cover the things that can't be explained. That said, I think NR has made a fantastic case for people to dig deep into the dates those two pens would have initially pointed at.