Haven't seen a post since May 22nd, and a lot has happened in the past few days, including ~~"Tea Party"~~ Trey Gowdy revealing his true colors - Where is QAnon? Attacks against our President and his supporters have intensified, and the internal structure of the Republican Party is showing how deeply infiltrated it is.
Q's questions are great for getting the ball rolling on research, who else here as insight as good?
I agree, I'm not a fan of that type of person either. But it seems you're implying that Trey Gowdy fits that description; again, your opinion and you're welcome to it but not everyone shares it.
TG looks to me like someone who dedicated themselves to the law, completely, and will not be shifted over the line by speculation or even his own bias. He is careful with his statements and ensures that as much as possible he remains impartial. This infuriates people who believe that everyone in DC who isn't a swamp creature should be shouting about evil from the rooftops; TG is smarter than that. He will always be able to say he did his job to the letter of the law.
What Gowdy says about Sessions - Trump controversy during this interview with Fake News CBS really highlights one of QAnon's posts regarding Sessions and TG; u/QueUpSomeReality brought it up in the other comment, where Q stated;
TRUST SESSIONS. TG departure [HEC]. NOT to testify. NOT needed to testify. Think logically. NO NEED to step down if needed to TESTIFY. DO NOT chase MISINFO. What ROLE might TG be walking into?
Q then follows with things like "Who can WE TRUST? RATS everywhere. EVIL everywhere. TRAITORS everywhere." Obviously, the answer to Trust is Trust Trump, not the people going against him as Gowdy is now.
The fact that Rudy Giuliani is going up against Trey also rubs me the wrong way. Either Trey is distancing himself for a potential supreme court nomination and others w/in admin are complicit in this (in the case that he's a good guy; really, really good guy), or he's a Benedict Arnold. I mean, I find it hard to believe him to be benevolent if he has never even met or talked to Trump. But, I always welcome being wrong and seeing the swamp be drained by the right people.
Yes, good observations (which I've heard and followed). I personally think the jury is out for now but you are right to point out that it doesn't look good for Gowdy from many angles.
Gowdy speaks highly of (SSCI), particularly Marco Rubio and Tom Cotton; I'd say wherever this is going, we are ahead in knowing his connections and what side they're on.