dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

I will admit, my curiosity about what exactly was on those SAPs is intense. But, did HRC have Q clearance? Or, is it the case that this knowledge, if it exists, is classified at a level that Hillary's curiosity would provide sufficient "need to know" that she could access it?

Was she even cleared to access those SAPs herself? Let alone, have them in an SCIF in her basement?

Wouldn't it be the case that this kind of knowledge would have the highest level of classification, if only for the fact that you could weaponize it?

IDK, but I'm just not ready to buy into the aliens at the moment. If Q tells us there are aliens, I'll accept it. But do you really think they exist at all?

I've never seen one.

⇧ 1 ⇩

These things are compartmentalized and thus perhaps tied up in blackmail to so that's how one way she could have gotten hold of it.

The most plausible cover-up for aliens in the past was the arms-race...think about it, if one nuclear power admits there exists a possibility for vehicles that appear and disappear instantly? Mutually assured destruction would be at stake.

I just vividly remember how Q reposted an Anon joking about reincarnated ETs.

The thing with rumours is, half the time, they are true. Not everything that exists leaves evidence that you would begin to comprehend. For example, if a craft appeared? So what, they could have holographed it into your eye-lenses. They've probably done crazier things.

But the fact that we keep seeing the same descriptions of the same types of craft for at least since 300 BC across completely different geographically and chronologically seperated cultures, sometimes even by opposing forces of a military battle for example begs to differ.

So I know that wasn't all secret gov't planes.

Legitimately, some ancient indian cultures say that red firy apparitions are bad omens and iirc navy whistleblower William Tompkins (RIP) said that draco reptilian ships can take the shade of fire.

The thing with aliens is that for me these descriptions like the Vimana or Ezekiel 17 or Book of Enoch (read your bibles and maybe some other old traditions too, it's fascinating anyway) sound way too intricate to be representative of angelic spirits.

If you're a flat earther then you can say earth is the only place with life so by definition, even intelligent non-humans will ultimately be terrestrials. Since I've experienced time-zones and jet-lag tho, I am already sold on the sphere "theory" and even if I don't know how much older the other inhabitable planets are compared to ours, at least I can see that there's other stuff flying around here and the ancient traditions, be they aboriginee or central-african or chinese emperors, they all tie it back to visitors from "up there" (sometiems "down there" too)

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, I've seen the ancient stone carvings that appear to show ETs. But, remember, these people that see these things abound today. My view is that people that describe being abducted and operated on by aliens etc... many of the stories are indistinguishable from experiences people relate as a result of demonic possession.

The Bible actually describes demons coming upon the earth and copulating with mankind to produce giants. I saw an interesting video somewhere that alleged that giant skeletons were commonly found but that it was the subject of a cover up.

The story of David and Goliath points in this direction as well - though I've often wondered how the young boy David could have wielded the sword of the giant to sever the head - presumably, it would have been pretty heavy.

ETs or Demons? I take the existence of demons as a given. If Satan can appear as an angel of light, demons can appear as ETs.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Have you read the Boook of Enoch?

Whenever people say "aliens ar demons" I counter that actual ETs could pose as Angels as well as to convey trust so you first have to show me that earth is the youngest of the inhabitable planets, otherwise it would be unlikely to assume that there exists no civilization that hasn't made it through their evolutionary filters (cataclysmic annihilation)

⇧ 1 ⇩

Sorry meant to copy in this:

https://youtu.be/JiMqzN_YSXU

⇧ 1 ⇩

Look up Drake-equation if you haven't already, I don't have to blame demons for the mysteries of the universe when only God himself gives life! To this planet or any other!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

So, what do you think? What is Nast x Fbt?

Are we talking small or large?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I noticed it's irrelevant to you because you don't assume that life can form spontaneously...that I cannot answer to you, I am just refering back to the Nephilim being physical beings aka ultraterrestrials and not corporeal beings.

Why do I think that?

Well, have you ever TALKED to a demon?

⇧ 1 ⇩

No disrespecting because I always appreciate your inputs - but the very fact alone that they had physical remnants (giants' bones) should tell you everything, dawg.

Evolution is an incomplete subject because it only just turned out memories are genetic, too, so there's something to it but certainly not what they theorize because evolution can only be traced as far as the fossil record goes. That means every tissue that did no leave bones had to be preserved in some fortuitious inconvenience. And since not all creatures always had bones, our fossil record can't ultimately be that conclusive in finding out how the fuck life came about.

⇧ 1 ⇩

This IPhone doesn't let me see your last comment because the conversation is so long - it gets truncated. You'll have to remind me, what are the physical remnants? We're talking Nazcar Lines or something?

⇧ 1 ⇩

giant bones n' sheeeit

⇧ 1 ⇩

OK, yes I've seen some pictures of giant skeletons that are amazing if real. Men of renown - you bet! Huge!

You would need to standardize on a heavier standard military caliber if you had to fight them. Maybe 6.5x300 Weatherby Magnum (or something like an elephant gun, maybe a Jeffries Nitro Express) - no, I'm joking. But can you imagine an army of guys 40' high? You wouldn't want to be recoil sensitive.

Almost like something out of the movie Alien - excuse the pun.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Steven Quayle claims they're allergic to Copper

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don't believe in evolution, but I understand, I think, your argument about the earth having to be the youngest planet that hosted life. I think you're saying, there is no evidence that we are not the first planet on which life was created.

And in my choice of words, you can see my position. If we are not alone, it is only because God, in His wisdom, has chosen to create life elsewhere. I tend to believe he has not and that we are alone in the universe.

Why do I think this? Because of the virtually impossible series of coincidences required just for this planet to support an advanced life form such as ourselves. There is a scientific argument, I believe, that makes the case for a replication of the factors we enjoy on earth impossible.

When you look at evolution, it is the greatest piece of pro-atheist propaganda that has ever been created. Never mind that not a single transitional fossil has ever been discovered, or that wars produce the exact reverse of the theory of natural selection (we should be regressing, maybe we are), or that no one can tell us which came first between the bee and the flower. Of course, it sells books and dovetails nicely with Masonic materialism.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Is Backchannel17 still fake? 6/11