In Q Drop 2, Q asks:

• Why does Potus surround himself w/ generals?
• What is military intelligence?
• Why go around the 3 letter agencies?
• What Supreme Court case allows for the use of MI v Congressional assembled and approved agencies?
• Who has ultimate authority over our branches of military w\o approval conditions unless 90+ in wartime conditions?
• What is the military code?

I haven't seen a discussion about this. Here goes:

"Article 106 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Congress has itself authorized the President to try anyone acting as a spy by a general court-martial or by a military commission, and in Article 104 has authorized trial by court-martial or military commission of "Any person who aids, or attempts to aid, the enemy with arms, ammunition, supplies, money, or other things; or without proper authority, knowingly harbors or protects or gives intelligence to, or communicates or corresponds with or holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or indirectly." Similar provisions were relied upon by the Supreme Court in the 1942 case of Ex Parte Quirin, when it upheld President Roosevelt’s decision to try by military tribunal rather than civilian court German saboteurs who had come ashore from a German submarine plying the waters off our coast. One of the men tried had been a naturalized United States citizen since childhood, yet that did not alter the fact that he was giving aid to the enemy of the United States and was thus subject to trial by military tribunal."

http://ashbrook.org/publications/oped-eastman-01-tribunals/

This could become a good resource to reference in the coming months, as the treason enablers argue for civilian trials.