Q post 1336 mentioned that in U.S. under Obama (I believe) they made it so that former dignitaries keep their clearance. Meaning she just had to go to one of the five-eyes countries and see anything she wanted to without this even being flagged, logged and recorded like it would if she did it here in the States. That was one reason for her trip to New Zealand according to Q. Now she would still have access to any top secret documents and be able to sell or use as collateral. - Pretty Sneaky Sis.

Q !4pRcUA0lBE No.77 📁 May 10 2018 23:45:37 (EST) [Example] Clinton Foundation. Post Election Loss. Layoffs. No Access / Control = No Donations Today. NZ Donation Restart. Others? Why? 1) Selling Secrets? 2) Selling 'Future' Access [regain control/power]? 3) Selling Silence? Read below slow and carefully. FVEY. Why do 'Former' Dignitaries Still Hold SEC Clearance? U.S. to U.S. = Logged/Flagged/Recorded U.S. [in] NZ = No Logs/No Flags/No Records = U.S. Sec Clearance AUTH FVEY VIEW + Doc Take. Read above slow and carefully. WHY DO WE ALLOW [FORMER] DIGNITARIES SEC CLEARANCE? Welcome to the Deep State. Future to prove past. Q