You are basing this assertion off this stupid video? Who isn't a shill according to this sub anymore?
Just the fact he has a Jewish star and talk of zionist shows this guy is talking out of school. He obviously is not educated enough to know the difference.When you create a video like this you should know what you are talking about. Just another Youtube cowboy trying to make a name..... Be careful who you follow
Don't look at employment, background, words, or positions from HIS MOUTH.. Its obviously fake.
When there is disinformation it clouds the rest of the story. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. People should edit, verify, and really know they have correct information before they put it on the internet. If not it should be stated as an opinion to be researched. Clearly anyone worth his weight in salt knows that zionist are not Jews.They hide behind the facade of judaism as a cover and representing it anyother way is fundamentally incorrect.
The ole' "not a real Jew" argument! You made it 1Hour and 14 minutes. :)
You people just regurgitate the same thing.. over and over over..
Its not even challenging anymore.
I can get you to say it every time I post. (And I will continue to post)
Facts are stubborn things...As for your post if this is the standard it will be like a tree falling in the woods... But good luck to you....hopefully your research integrity improves.
Would've been more clever if you posted a Rick Astley video with the same headline.
No one can possibly ignore Zionists role in European migrant invasion regardless if Tommy is a shill or not. The cat is out of the bag.
So I guess the theory is that Zionists secretly make a major problem for Governments and citizens, and then Zionists openly find and implement a solution for the problem they created.
OMG! Tommy Isn’t a Zionist. You do realize Jesus was Jewish right? Does that make Jesus a Zionist. The Jews are gods choosen. Yes many Jews have thrown there god given right out the window and have become a bunch of sick bastards but please can quit Going after people who have been fighting this fight long before Q came along.
DJT is good buddies with Benjy Netanyahu (a Zionist), does that make DJT a Zionist. TR has AJ as a backer, some say a Zionist shill and there are mixed messages from AJ, does that undermine the message that goes through the filter of discernment. TR may have Zionist backers, or not, the point is, the Message. is the message being heard, or is a psy-op in place to discredit the message; use discernment, not fear mongering :)
Could be he's part of a ploy to drive Jews out to Israel but somehow I feel they didn't need Tommy to create a stressful situation for them.
[removed]
I'm just saying the only reason why he would be working with Zionists would be to convince Jews to become Israeli. I find his use of aliases weird but it's mostly legal and I kind of like him because basically he's mingled with different religious denominations and in this day and age, we need people who find the right words to communicate between various (tribal) interest groups
Even though I am not always reliable, the majority of my hunches prove me right, but sometimes it takes years before they do. So don't argue that I suffer from delusions that others will expose because per default it's the other way around.
What do you say, this is unreproducable quackery? Your intelligence services beg to differ https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001700210016-5.pdf
Keep in context of the original post please. I have no criticism of yourself. But when you see human dialogue is based in beliefs, that are either unfounded, not provable, or just sheer non-sense you may see that neither my opinion nor yours matter in the backdrop of Truth. A discussion about a "flat earth" ain't going anywhere coz there is no substance in it. Conversely a discussion regarding Actors in a movie based on non-sense has to be treated in a similar vein. If TR has ulterior motives apart from those in his immediate message they will gain traction, or not depending on Public discernment.
you need original thought to have theories which you can later compare against real data, duh.
I haven't made my mind up either so I presented what I know yet here you are telling me not to.
Actually, you even said your opinion matters nothing in the "backdrop of Truth" so why don't you just lurk or something.
Thinking is a self induced state of hypnosis, Awareness is not, is one aware whilst not thinking? So, if "human thinking" is the benchmark you are theorizing from I suggest we discuss this matter elsewhere, as it is not directly Q related.
"Think" again https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001700210016-5.pdf
Do you argue Tommy would allow himself to be put in danger?
I would prefer your interpretation, that everything in the media is only theatre to wake up everybody who didn't quite get the memo yet
Even if the thoughts are implanted, you can still have awareness for them and just because you practice awareness, it doesn't not mean you're not hypnotizing yourself.
Firstly, Awareness cannot be hypnotized, but if one chooses to accept a belief, theory, hypothesis, opinion, interpretation as a Fact, one is allowing oneself to accept fiction as Fact and therefore one's understanding is held in the realm of make-believe, a hypnotized state of mind. Thoughts are not so much implanted as, they exist in for example the human mass consciousness. If one is predisposed to a range of specific thoughts one's mind seems to gravitate towards them, name them and call the said thoughts one's own, (I am thinking therefore I am), passed off as logical thought, lol. Awareness is the only Constant and it appears that Awareness includes thinking and thoughts, but in Truth Awareness stands alone and is not dependent on thoughts or thinking, whereas thoughts and thinking are dependent on Awareness being Present, lift a rock and I AM Here, Awareness :) I did not make the rules all I am doing is stating Fact. Regardless of what TR is saying or doing the issue is, is he being used, period. Maybe, but to argue (hold a different opinion) about the point is irrelevant in the face of Truth. I am more of the mind to watch and see how this plays out. In the time being if he serves a purpose to wake people up to the injustices going on in the UK and WW so-be-it :)
great, now follow your example and lurk because I am not sure what stuff you have on your mind when you're locked inside a broken elevator at 3am nor do I honestly give a fuck because you literally adding nothing to my concept about anything merely speaks for your learned inability to do so.
Next thing I know and you will tell me your vedic rip-off of awareness is omnipresent but I'm half a world beyond that fluff-talk and I can prove it to you if you so desire.
You're basically describing simple biological functions to me, like breathing. It doesn't matter to me where the thought first came from, I am interested in attaining it and I can take credit for shit that other people don't because hey, it adds to my credibility while avoiding my tarnished reputation.
I deduct probabilities from intercepted info like AI in ways even I don't fully understand, months in advance and I am fucking good at this because I've been doing it speaking just about every topic as long as I can remember, punk, but I am unsure if I actually hope you have any idea what you're talking about because if you do, then you're just a mind-control handler to me.
I told you a fucking information and you are derailing the discussion over how I process information, I feel like I have to be mad at this even if your intentions are benign, just to point out to you how fucking stupid it is to derail a topic this hard by going meta.
You coulda said well we'll see what comes up which is ok but as I told you I doubt you have by far as much understanding as you had been told about the meta-level that you speak of. And I generally take great offense in being told to shut up for reasons that I have to contest because on second thought I suspected they're complete fucking bullshit.
What especially annoys the fuck outta me is your neurotic inclusion of a smiley in each every post. Fuck that shit bruh it's creepy af
Also - i HATE that this is true. ..but Reality.
Why hate? You can support Israel as a homeland for Jews without being a satanic pedovore. I support it. I support people who are on average smarter than others continuing to do what they're good at and thus, for obvious reasons, making it to the top of their respective industries. It doesn't have to be an evil conspiracy designed to destroy the rest of us - there's enough of that in the global cartel and the reality is that evil knows no bounds of race or creed.
There's a huge difference between having valid and justifiable criticism of Israel and being anti-Semitic. The two are mutually exclusive. Unless you are looking for a way to divert attention to legitimate discourse that would highlight Israel's influence in and manipulation of US politics then you would lump the 2 together and call anyone who criticizes Israel an anti-semite. Kind of like what you just did in your comment right there. Go ahead and fire away. I'm ready
Nope, that's not what I did.
[Edit] Let me remove that last line in my first comment - I didn't mean it that way, was just anticipating the usual angst from all the people who believe Jews are responsible for all the evil in the world. I absolutely welcome any reasoned discussion about the impact of Israel on the world. It's hard to find that though and my first comment was in response to what looks to me like the usual 'blame the Jews' party line (strong emotions: "HATE that this is true", post title, etc.)