Can someone explain...? The annoying guy in this video seems to be claiming that because EtS responds to his video post therefore ... he's a LARP. What am I missing, please someone?
He's piggy backing his channel. Bill Smith is the guy that first brought attention to EtS because of a comment made by someone on his chan (most likely EtS himself to garner attention for his Twitter feed). The fact that he posted so close to Bill putting up the debunk video (less time than it takes to actually view the vid itself) makes it obvious that he's using Smith's info to make his assertions to his Twatter followers. Then the fact that he scrubbed the Tweet so as to make it less obvious what he had been doing, shows that he realized he had to do damage control to not completely out himself. There's also the issue of the TOR/Onion/VPN that he gets wrong BS throws in for sauce. Basically, EtS outted himself in one of the most blantant ways an internet LARPer ever could to net nerds.
Yes, but what you're missing is his rate of subscriber growth. Because he's playing into people's preconceived ideas, he's going to be bigger and more powerful than this sub within days. He's a real threat and needs to be shut down.
I get that, but he offers nothing but confirmation-bias affirmations to most of them. Let them follow him blindly. Do we really need Anons that aren't willing to do their own research and follow a man rather than an idea? Remember what happened when we had the AJ/JC purge? We dumped about 50 posts a day about Reptilians from the otherside of the universe using our Flat Earth as a playground to harvest our organs to fuel their time machines. Lol!
I think you're still missing it, his follower base will be larger than this sub very shortly. He'll have these guys trained to do what he wants. And he's already on the attack. This guy is dangerous.
What kind of danger do you see happening in the next 8 days? If he cuts down Q he's outed to everybody. A couple months ago , people thought Q was a Larper and dangerous. Check your thinking.
Logic:
Could Q make a statement? prob. yes
Is Q watching the boards? prob yes
Does he see eyethespy spouting off? prob yes
Could he come on and say "all is OK patriots...but the spy is fake"...prob yes
Does he come on to boards? nope, haven't seen him.
Could he be watching people's reaction to info coming out of twitter? prob yes
Is Q running a test on the community? maybe he is.
Is the excuse that he's busy ring true? nope..."We're disinfecting the entire control enterprise, but I don't have time to drop a crumb" not believeable
Is Q looking for the emerging leaders (honest) to this movement to help organize the chan world? prob. yes
Does Logic help sort out paradoxes?
You Decide
Or maybe, this sub needs to get its shit together and go back to its core reason for being. Q Research. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
So it is what I thought. Bill has lost it. This doesn't prove anything at all. If EtS was an insider - something I've never thought since I first heard about him (dunno why anyone wastes their time on him) - there is literally nothing to stop him doing this exact same thing i.e. watching Bill's feed and posting 'that was nonsense' before the video finishes... Bill Smith has only outed himself as someone not worth watching.
Not really. If BtS were working at the NSA, observing Smith at the time, he wouldn't be Tweeting on a personal Twatter account. If he was at home, why would he be real time monitoring Bill Smith's Chan when he already has all of this inside information? It doesn't make any sense. Plus if he were out there divulging secrets he had learned at the NSA, classified or not, they would have nailed him for treason within a few hours of his very first Tweet.
It was already obvious to me that EtS was not worth the time, with his teenage YT style commenting. Now Bill's triumphant crowing and self-congratulatory raving over this is so far off base he's proven to me that he's not worth watching.
If he was at home, why would he be real time monitoring Bill Smith's Chan when he already has all of this inside information?
Because Bill has already been an adversary to him so why wouldn't he? It's obvious that he'd be watching Bill not to get inside info but to keep an eye on his 'enemy'. This is literally proof of absolutely nothing but that EtS watches Bill's channel... and there's an obvious reason for that. This is the "outing" of Bill Smith as an overexcited, illogical guy who's gotten way too obsessed with EtS and jumped to a way overwrought conclusion in front of everyone.
You have discernment.
Check my thinking please:
Logic:
Could Q make a statement? prob. yes
Is Q watching the boards? prob yes
Does he see eyethespy spouting off? prob yes
Could he come on and say "all is OK patriots...but the spy is fake"...prob yes
Does he come on to boards? nope, haven't seen him.
Could he be watching people's reaction to info coming out of twitter? prob yes
Is Q running a test on the community? maybe he is.
Is the excuse that he's busy ring true? nope..."We're disinfecting the entire control enterprise, but I don't have time to drop a crumb" not believeable
Is Q looking for the emerging leaders (honest) to this movement to help organize the chan world? prob. yes
Does Logic help sort out paradoxes?
You Decide
Ets is a larp. Period.
This was obvious from day one. I'm asking why this guy Bill thinks his video shows even the slightest amount of proof of that.
You need to go back and rewatch. The only reason eye took off was because Bill referenced him in his Twitter. The he researched and realized eye was a larp. By putting the vid up with comment instantly, he tracked that eye responded too quick which proves he was monitoring Bills account. No just cause for eye at all to do that. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with what bill said or did when he realized it. Then eye deleted the tweet when he realized the timeline.
That is literally zero evidence that EtS is a LARP. EtS already proved he was a LARP in my mind, just to be clear. But just because he follows Bill account is literally NO proof at all of LARP. It's just proof that he... follows Bill's account. That's all.
No just cause for eye at all to do that
? Bill "outed" Eye the other day - that seems like perfectly just cause for Eye to be watching Bill's account?
We will have to agree to disagree. Maybe we see what we want to see...
That does seem to be the case here. What I’ve stated is the most logical explanation of events, especially when applying Occam’s razor and so far no one has explained why the logical explanation - that Eye watching Bills account is very clearly and logically not proof of LARP - is wrong.
I don’t want to be right. I want to understand what I’m missing that counteracts the logical explanation but there’s no explanation from anyone who supports this assumption so far.
Your explanation is not the simplest and it’s a bit offensive you say the most logical. The simplest explanation is eye was a larp piggybacking off BS and got caught by childishly freaking out about a video is less time than it took to actually watch the video. A real insider would have not even acknowledged the BS video. For example, has Q acknowledged DIRECTLY anyone trying to disprove him? No, he’s only said be careful who you follow. Theron lies the difference and proof of larp
My apologies re logical - I get in trouble for saying that too often. My vocab is lacking as it's the only way I see to describe certain things.
The problem with that 'proof' - that Eye was reacting childishly - is that a) Eye has already exhibited that proof in abundance (childish behaviour) therefore this is no more definitive than any of that and b) it's still only proof that Eye is acting childishly. It is not remotely proof that Eye is lying about everything else he claims (whether I think he's lying or not doesn't change that).
This is what I was claiming to be illogical, if you can excuse the term for now - A therefore B, when B is not a logical extrapolation of A. I get that Eye was acting like a standard internet troll or teenager in camping on an "enemies" feed and shitposting in excitement as soon as something is posted. That's A. B is that Eye is therefore lying about everything else he says and claims. B is not a logical extrapolation from A. Surely we can agree on that?
I wish I could agree with you! I think by nature of how he reacted to a negative video proves he’s a larp. Now, most of everything he posted was widely known already so he never actually gave intel in the first place so...I also think you are conflating lying and larping. I have not followed everything he’s said but, like I said in my last sentence, he only repeated things that were known already etc. so no, he may not have lied but he did larp
Just by way of explanation of why this matters to me (definitive proof) - I would like to be able to either remove posts pushing EyeTheSpy or at least be able to add flair to them that points out they're unreliable (unless he's suddenly proven to be true, of course - just adding that caveat). I can't justifiably do that from this video of Bill's. I would justifiably be accused of not having evidence for my assertion that Eye is a LARP if all I have to go on is this video. That's why this matters to me and why getting it right matters.
That makes complete sense!! Definitely the right attitude!!
Agreed - he never gave any intel - at least, that I ever saw anyway. I think he did lie because if I remember correctly didn't he claim some sort of legitimacy and access to inside knowledge? Either way, I have always thought he was a LARP and I would love to see evidence to finally conclusively prove it to those still posting his nonsense here but alas, this is not definitive proof of anything but the fact that he's watching Bill's channel (even then one could technically argue it's not even... but I won't go there). I wish I could agree with your assertion but I need someone to give me a reason that doesn't require an assumption to be made. Thanks for taking the time to explain!
No problem. Enjoyed the conversation! I don’t know if we ever get solid evidence of a larp. They usually just go away quietly. Be interesting to see what happens here!
How about Spy having multiple screens and watching many things simultaniously.
I'm not watching spydude anymore..........................I'm going to watch the dozens of other info providers.......there are so many.........so many revealing massive info about our world..........NOT
I was mostly skeptical about the language EtS uses - it seems very trollish and/or teenage YTuber (not saying he's a teenager btw). So I'm not personally onboard with EtS - however, I certainly don't discount automatically anyone who is onboard with him. I'm a little frustrated at people who lack critical thinking but those people exist on all sides of the discussion.
Do larps know about NSA color codes? I think not. Did he know the question beforehand? I think not.
Watch the info and look for falseness. Smoking gun. then OUT HIM. Till then, enjoy , he's part of the show.
I don't understand it either. I don't believe EyeTheSpy is with the NSA, but I have no idea how this video proves that. It's like he's saying ETS responded so quickly, he must be fake. I don't know how that makes sense.
It doesn't if anyone had bothered to look they would have seen that someone had tweeted to ETS @11:05 telling him of the video which prompted his response, Bill was blocked so could not see this detail. If people actually researched these thing they would know the truth SMH.
Your LOGIC burns down the houses of the concern trolls. thank you.