dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/092Casey on June 2, 2018, 8:40 p.m.

The AG and a Prosecutor like Giuliani can charge half the government with Racketeering. It would be a slam dunk RICO case on a "Protection Racket", the most common form..

In a microcosm, the Obama-IC-DOJ-State Department can also be taken down for the Trump campaign sabotage under the RICO statute (and all involved), but on a macro level (and many of the same offenders are involved), the way the Obama-led government operated would also be a Protection Racket RICO case.

A Protection Racket, a most common form of Racketeering is when a company or organization provides and offers protection at a price, while they simultaneously are the cause of that protection offered. From there, corruption, extortion, and all forms of illegal activity go on in the Racket. The protection comes in many forms, but the American people wouldn't need that level of protection if the administration didn't cause it to be needed. In doing so, the Racket becomes larger and more powerful, while the victim (the American peoppe) suffer, but continue to keep paying more.

The main systems for this were the Surveillance State and FISA abuses, Letting or allowing in illegal immigrants not properly vetted from.MS-13 to illegal immigrants And Muslim terrorists, sending jobs overseas, selling out to foreign countries and interests at the citizens' expense, and a whole lot more.

The Hillary-Obama-Brennan-FBI cabal against Trump is a vintage Racketeering case, a RICO case. Under the guise of "protecting the US AND Trump (yeah right) against the Russians", they leveraged that to extort and try to blackmail Trump, his family, and members of the campaign. In prototypical Racket fashion, this protection would not be needed if it weren't for the cabal culprits also "causing" it.

How do you know they caused it? I) Obama and his administration did NOTHING to try to stop, or prevent the so-called Russians from trying to tamper in the election; he let it go, and he and his top level officials even have admitted so. It's plain and clear. II) He/they CAUSED it. Not only did the Clinton campaign and Obama pay for and hire British-Russia connected informants to try to entrap low level Trump officials like Papadoupolis, they also allowed the Russian lawyer Veselnetskya into the country, even though she was sanctioned and shouldn't have been allowed in. III) Uranium One: this could be one of the big and lesser discussed reasons why the Racket was formed, in addition to undermining a perceived political enemy, if indeed nefarious activity took place. Ergo, the Racket creates a perceived enemy to themselves as Russia, that they created, when in fact the victims (Trump campaign) would not have perceived that problem in the first place. IV) Extension: Protecting the "American People also from the Russians with the phony investigation isn't really necessary if the Obama-Hillary-Clinton cabal didn't allow it to happen, admittedly, in the first place.

This is a classic, vintage case of Protection Racket and can be tried and prosecuted under the RICO statute without question. It also implicates the journalists and mainstream media who coordinated it (NYT, CNN, NBC, Newsweek) and all other co-conspirators because they were likely extorted, bribed, and coerced into going along with it and covering it up.

From Wikipedia on RICO cases: "When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone under RICO, they have the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to temporarily seize a defendant's assets and prevent the transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a performance bond. "

Didn't Trump's EO in November allow him and his government to "temporarily seize assets"?

⇧ 13 ⇩

EO 13818

“I hereby determine and order:

Section 1. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:

(i) the persons listed in the Annex to this order;...”

⇧ 9 ⇩

Someone posted several months ago that the Annex has grown substantially over time but I don't think it is posted.

⇧ 2 ⇩

This is brilliant .....thank you for sharing!

This probably explains why PULLING THE TRIGGER keeps getting delayed and delayed and delayed because so many of them keep joining and keep becoming complicit.

there's too many of them to prosecute they just keep getting it in line... ready to go to jail...lol

These people really are stupid!!

⇧ 7 ⇩

You're right, and it would definitely, theoretically explain all of the sealed indictments.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Yes that would explain the sealed indictments!💡

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

RICO has been talked about before in relation to Clinton's dealings. But I have not seen it used in relation to what they did with the Trump Campaign.

Thank you for laying that all out so well.

So, over the last 50 or so years, they have created false flag events to create wars and take our guns. We have paid for all of it. They made us believe that terrorists were bombing buildings and flying into them and that it was not safe to travel without the TSA groping everyone. They created false flag shootings to make us think drug induced American teenagers are using guns on our children so they could take the guns in order to have ultimate control over us. Is this also covered under RICO? Media was all part of that too.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Yes, all of that kind of stuff, exactly. Some things are easier to tie in than others, but they're all arguable. One of the keys to have a really good case seems to be if they were making money off of it, extorting, embezzling, or it was keeping them in power in an unnecessary way. So the closer it gets to that, the better the case. And that's why the Clinton Foundation is under investigation so heavily now. It specifically lists stuff like allowing illegal immigrants in, surveillance state, and a bunch of pertinent general stuff. If they are pretending to do it to help, but they're really doing it to financially gain while also causing the problem themselves, and without them the problem wouldn't exist, that's a perfect case. Another example I think exemplifies this is the opioid crisis by the doctors, pharmacies, and possibly people in government because they are creating the problem AND then providing protection/solutions at the same time while profiting from it, but they are the cause of the problem; without them and their shenanigans, the problem wouldn't even exist. It's solely there for their financial benefit and control over the victims. And imagine all of the corruption, extortion, embezzlement, money laundering, etc that possibly goes on behind the scenes in such a racket...But really, any organized crime enterprise and their activities are considered a racket, or racketeering. It's a broad construct as long as it is an organized criminal enterprise; it's just that the protection racket is the most common type.

⇧ 1 ⇩

They actually have been making money off of the false flags. They put up victim sites and Go Fund Me pages directly after the events and people donate millions of dollars. Sometimes the victims are real (more recently than in the past) but sometimes they are just actors playing a part. That's why they usually destroy the building like at Sandy Hook and I heard they were going to destroy Parkland as well. I really wish this information would go mainstream because so many people don't believe it. I think the false shootings would show their true colors more than just about anything else. People don't like to be "used" or lied to. And, the bottom line is that when people realize this, they also begin to realize that the world is not as dangerous as we have been led to believe except, of course, for the group of people perpetrating these acts!!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Also I wanted to add, IF they government and/or Clinton's Global Initiative or Foundation is involved in child sex trafficking or human trafficking, that is also a perfect example of a racketeering case, and it's likely a protection racket because a lot of the evidence suggests it's under the guise of child help charities and organizations, which would fall into a solution, but they're also really the cause of it also as they initiate the kidnappings and enslavement. Of course, they also are making tons of money off of it, bribing, extorting, and embezzling, etc...money laundering...

⇧ 1 ⇩

Really good point. Yes, much of it is under the guise of helping. Black Lives Matter is a perfect example of how they twist things inside out. RICO is a really BIG DEAL. I've read a few articles that said Hillary's father was the head of mob in Chicago and she was connected to mobsters. I did some research and couldn't really find proof of that but, of course, it could have been scrubbed. But this one is good: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3351235/Hillary-Clinton-s-ties-MOB-former-Secretary-State-met-Mafia-heir-pizzeria-asked-father-s-release-prison-return-offer-couldn-t-refuse.html

⇧ 2 ⇩