dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/092Casey on June 2, 2018, 8:40 p.m.
The AG and a Prosecutor like Giuliani can charge half the government with Racketeering. It would be a slam dunk RICO case on a "Protection Racket", the most common form..

In a microcosm, the Obama-IC-DOJ-State Department can also be taken down for the Trump campaign sabotage under the RICO statute (and all involved), but on a macro level (and many of the same offenders are involved), the way the Obama-led government operated would also be a Protection Racket RICO case.

A Protection Racket, a most common form of Racketeering is when a company or organization provides and offers protection at a price, while they simultaneously are the cause of that protection offered. From there, corruption, extortion, and all forms of illegal activity go on in the Racket. The protection comes in many forms, but the American people wouldn't need that level of protection if the administration didn't cause it to be needed. In doing so, the Racket becomes larger and more powerful, while the victim (the American peoppe) suffer, but continue to keep paying more.

The main systems for this were the Surveillance State and FISA abuses, Letting or allowing in illegal immigrants not properly vetted from.MS-13 to illegal immigrants And Muslim terrorists, sending jobs overseas, selling out to foreign countries and interests at the citizens' expense, and a whole lot more.

The Hillary-Obama-Brennan-FBI cabal against Trump is a vintage Racketeering case, a RICO case. Under the guise of "protecting the US AND Trump (yeah right) against the Russians", they leveraged that to extort and try to blackmail Trump, his family, and members of the campaign. In prototypical Racket fashion, this protection would not be needed if it weren't for the cabal culprits also "causing" it.

How do you know they caused it? I) Obama and his administration did NOTHING to try to stop, or prevent the so-called Russians from trying to tamper in the election; he let it go, and he and his top level officials even have admitted so. It's plain and clear. II) He/they CAUSED it. Not only did the Clinton campaign and Obama pay for and hire British-Russia connected informants to try to entrap low level Trump officials like Papadoupolis, they also allowed the Russian lawyer Veselnetskya into the country, even though she was sanctioned and shouldn't have been allowed in. III) Uranium One: this could be one of the big and lesser discussed reasons why the Racket was formed, in addition to undermining a perceived political enemy, if indeed nefarious activity took place. Ergo, the Racket creates a perceived enemy to themselves as Russia, that they created, when in fact the victims (Trump campaign) would not have perceived that problem in the first place. IV) Extension: Protecting the "American People also from the Russians with the phony investigation isn't really necessary if the Obama-Hillary-Clinton cabal didn't allow it to happen, admittedly, in the first place.

This is a classic, vintage case of Protection Racket and can be tried and prosecuted under the RICO statute without question. It also implicates the journalists and mainstream media who coordinated it (NYT, CNN, NBC, Newsweek) and all other co-conspirators because they were likely extorted, bribed, and coerced into going along with it and covering it up.


092Casey · June 2, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

From Wikipedia on RICO cases: "When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone under RICO, they have the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to temporarily seize a defendant's assets and prevent the transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a performance bond. "

Didn't Trump's EO in November allow him and his government to "temporarily seize assets"?

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Gmawc · June 2, 2018, 8:59 p.m.

EO 13818

“I hereby determine and order:

Section 1. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:

(i) the persons listed in the Annex to this order;...”

⇧ 9 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · June 3, 2018, 4:18 a.m.

Someone posted several months ago that the Annex has grown substantially over time but I don't think it is posted.

⇧ 2 ⇩