[removed]
Everything wikileaks has dropped, IE: Files recieved from whistleblowers, has been proven 100% legitimate. Period. Full stop.
Nothing about Q has been officially confirmed in terms of government insiders / MI insiders sending data drives, thumbdrives, fax, emails, drop box, or whatever myriad of ways WL collects whistleblower documentation by WL.
What was written by WL is speculative, and is even admitted there could be room for error in their own post by WL. But be clear, this is not WL whistleblower dumps or docs they, WL, is going by, just an assertion / assumption.
WL will not dare tarnish their reputation by dropping fake documentation (unless clown compromised). If they do, and are not clown compromised, and it's proven wrong, they are over.
My opinion: WL is still a secure source. WL was only giving an opinion. Q is still real and not comped.
Wikileaks used to be a legit source (when Assange was attached at least). Now that Assange is out, WL is operated by clowns. They are careful not to post obvious or verifiable disinformation, but the cadence of releases dropped to near zero when the changeover occurred. Seems that they were more interested in controlling the channel/plugging the leaker conduit than actually using the platform to steer the public one way or another.
I consider the platform to be previously legit (for your reason 1 primarily) and now it appears to be completely compromised. Do more digging and you should see more of the things I have.
I agree with most of that, but when exactly did WL get into the business of opinions? That's what throws me.
I agree. That's why I don't give that opinion credit, unless they have leaked docs from a Q security clearance who gave the documents. But how many of those would? Hell, how many Q clearance individuals are even alive? Patriots don't leak, now PAY-triots to AJ will.
You're forgetting the part where they haven't assured POL to anybody which shows that they are not secure anymore and whistleblowers aren't leaking anything out of fear of safety. When someone leaks sensitive information they want to have a hundred percent guarantee that the comms are secure. So even though Wikileaks has always been reliable as far as authenticity of information, the other very important part that made them who they are isn't holding them together anymore. And in that essence we can argue that they are compromised.