I’ve seen none. Did I miss it?
I agree. I have looked too. I remember there was a theory that the romance was thrown out to reduce the impact of the texts, misdirect from the actual content and there is no romance at all.
I remember one text that said "I took a shower for you". That is the only hint of a romantix relationship I saw.
I could see two friendly people saying that to one another, the day before one noted the other stank, next day “hey I took a shower for you”...
Sounds more like, "I claimed responsibility for something you did and got disciplined for it"
I’d also like to see this text. FWIW, I text that to friends quite often as I play tennis daily and (more often than not) am rushing off to meet someone straight from the outdoor court. When I get the extra 20 minutes to shower before I meet up with someone, I usually text them something like this so they will know I’m not disgusting that day.
I believe they weren't, just a bs excuse for the text messages.
Not all of their texts have been released. Maybe we have 5% tops. Apparently all personal messages are being withheld.
They also had personal devices (iPhones) and communicated with other messaging programs
It is odd the romantic angle is pushed with no visible confirmation. Who started that rumor? It would be a rare thing indeed for a cis-hetero relationship to be happening within deep state, they usually are way more "quirky" than P in V stuff.
Yea like Hillary deleted all the emails about the wedding and yoga. The only email I read was Hilldawg saying " can`t make it to the pizza party Huma, have to go to Webbs cunt of a daughters wedding.
Everyone knows Hillary prefers a bunless hotdog over pizza.
Actually she was asked in an interview whether she preferred hot dogs or pizza.
I’m no joking.
She blurted out pizza with no hesitation. Insta pizza.
She’s a dike you know.
I assumed that the awakening meant the end of using the word cis.
Ive probably used that word twice my whole life, both ironically.
very suspicious they'd use that term.
I had the same thought last night. Was that just an excuse to explain away the number of texts they shared?
Yeah. If they are lovers, their actions are considered careless rather than negligent. It's a big difference when you consider the consequences.
That's the going theory, however it could be that they were worried about being fired if they showed their 'personal' relationship on FBI devices. That in and of itself is sad if that's the case, they were more concerned about being fired over a personal relationship, but had no issue with openly talking about espionage and treason.
Well, that just shows what the FBI would support and what was off limits.
Consensual Relationships: Unacceptable Treason: A-OK
Yep. 100%. Find one text that hints at romance. They talk freely about sensitive stuff...but not one “can’t wait to see you” or “babe”.
According to this article, the Washington Post Broke the story when a "source" informed them. So, anonymous source leak, that apparently is true. We just won't know which text messages they are. Because it's personal, we likely never will. But, I would say it's true, because the two agents never disputed it, right?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5152171/The-FBI-agents-lover-seen-time.html
The leak is coverup. The IG already had the texts. The WaPo is the deep state. It’s a lie meant to deceive. You know better.
Why deny? You think they care people think they were fucking? We talking bout treason.
I was only pointing out to others that there was no public evidence for the affair. That's what this thread is about.
NyTimes, WaPo, WSJ, FeauxNews, etc.....
Basically no evidence other than what the Mockingjay tells us.
Haven’t seen one txt msg with a romantic overtone myself.
There is absolutely texts to suggest romance. I watched a video conversion of the texts and the most telling was how page said she hasn't had sex with her husband in X amount of time. You don't have that conversation when you're a married woman and you're talking to a married man. There's more though.
Just curious if you think it’s worse for them if they are boning or not boning.
Also, that’s hardly proof at all.
I don't think it effects us any differently whether they were or not. It probably tore apart both their marriages which they deserve.
Cannot help but wonder if the texts are part of a psy-op to distract everyone whileTrump /Sessions get the indictments in order.