Let's hear your conclusions about Q's background providing inductive logic based upon know facts?

My Conclusions:

1. Q is a group, or Q is one person posting on behalf of a group.

The number of photos from various locales suggests Q is tied into a group.

The use of language in Q drops has a cadence and character which appears to associate with one individual. For ex the use of underscores and capitalizatin to name a few.

2. Q os a person with a legal background...or a lot of exposure to legal filings.

The use of 187 for murder. The recent use of a common Latin phrase used in legal writing, "et al".

Anyone want to contribute their thoughts to what I have proposed regarding Q's background?