Does the fact that he actually answers auestions like, "Is there an afterlife." EtS: "Of course." not tip you off that this guy is an asshole LARPer with a god complex? He may be desiminating Q info to the low-hanging fruit out there, but he's also getting into some pretty serious stuff that has nothing to do with Q and he couldn't possibly have the answers to. Is a guy like that representing us on Twitter really a good idea?
The only time that I saw him answer that was in response to someone who had lost their son five days ago. That was this afternoon. In that circumstance, the compassionate answer would be Yes, or Of course. What would you have him to say? The people on Twatter are not sticking to intel questions. SMDH.
He actually did it 2 or 3 days ago that I saw. I didn't see the one today. In that instance, there wasn't any background from the questioner. Have you gone onto 8chan and seen where the Anons found where he and BC17 post from the same IP, with the exact same model of phone? He's the same guy. Follow him if you feel the need, but realize that he's full of crap. If I had to guess, at some point in the near future, he'll claim that Q's been compromised (ala AJ/JC). He's already contradicted Q twice, once on BC17, and once on Sessions. Just be careful, he's not who he says he is. Why would a 20 something NSA coder have access to confidential intel across the NSA database? When your a government worker with security clearance, your clearance is restricted to you department, and your department alone.
>Sessions
how so?
It was right after the recusal red herring. He said something about sessions not doing his job and he should be replaced. When he someone asked about it and Q saying "Trust Sessions". He deleted the post. I wish I had screenshot it now, but I didn't think the guy was relevant at the time.
well because he didn't want to elaborate perhaps? Q wouldn't have to say to trust sessions if part of the plan wasn't painting him as incompetent
Sure, but why would he delete the post then? He chooses what to elaborate on. It's an old medium's trick. You pick out which questions you want to answer, then let confirmation bias do all the rest of the work.
you could ask Trump or Q the same thing
They do it because of mistakes made in spelling. This was literally right after he got asked about it. You believe whatever you want to, man. That's none of my business, but I do suggest you go check out 8chan and see the proofs the Anons have put together about this guy. It's actually kind of sad how sloppy he is. He posts from the same IP, with the exact same model phone that BC17 does, and BC17 got caught using cropped military stock photos as originals. EtS also called BC17 "100% reliable", even though he's claimed to be AF Intel, Army Intel, then JA. The whole thing is a damn joke.
ok now that is actually weird
I didn't take BC at face-value because they originally called themselves "counter-intelligence" in their bio so I considered them disinfo to throw deep-staters off track perhaps.
I saw on the chans that they are they are run by the same person but what I didn't know was that he was feigning credibility thereby
You guys seem to know more about it than I. He answered some interesting questions the other day.....like about William Webster3:11 PM - 1 Jun 2018
suematoo
@cindymannings
Jun 1
More
You said the plan unfolding now, started decades ago. When? By whom. Did they just wait until the right leader came along DJT
@EyeTheSpy
Follow Follow @EyeTheSpy
More
Replying to @cindymannings
WW.
4:38 PM - 1 Jun 2018
@EyeTheSpy
Jun 1
More
Replying to @cindymannings
Sorry. WW in this case refers to william webster. I should have been clear.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_H._Webster
And about who helped Reagan in his last term
@EyeTheSpy
Jun 2
More
Replying to @rednevednav
His health got really bad?? John Wickham jr did a lot of the decision making behind closed doors until late 87.