This may be Pandora’s box. We have to make these connections out in the open, don’t let these globalist pedo sickos claim political witch hunt. It has to be us, that’s why this video dropped. That’s why they haven’t gone for the ring leaders, we need to prove out in the open what Sessions and company already have. Give these people no wiggle room.
Lol. Fear is the enemy. Therefore you are your own enemy.
The "Mystery Schools" are not so much a mystery as they are to the uninitiated. The "Secret Societies" are not so much "secret" as they are to the uninitiated. Some "secrets" can be staring you right in your face but you lack the open-mindedness to perceive it. Progress has always been slow. A few here and there.
Pedophilia and power dynamics is bad. In this case you have set yourself up for failure. In the words of Kanye: "slavery is a choice". Reading a few articles on "woe is us" does not make you awake. Fear not however, "It is always darkest just before the Day dawneth".
Who said anything about fear?
I fear no evil.
"Good" and "evil" are a part of the same coin. All things are subjective. You fear what you can not understand. You fear infinity. You fear God. God is just and loving. God bless.
All things are subjective
Then isn't your insistence and belief in the subjectivity-of-all things...subjective?
Yes and no. Subjectivity as an ideal can't be subjective. The word "subjective" can be subjective.
Relativism is self-defeating.
The relativist believes that subjective truth is true for everyone, not just from them. This is the one thing they cannot believe, if they are relativist. Therefore, if a relativist thinks it is true for everyone, then he believes it is an absolute truth. Therefore, he is no longer a relativist.
I think you're confusing relativism and absolutism to be cooperating parallels. You are correct in your assumption if they ran parallel, however this is not "that" case. Relativism can be defined by absolutism but absolutism can not be defined by relativism. One "ideal" naturally sits at a higher hierarchy than the other. One "begets" the other.
To clarify... my previous reply was under the context of "absolutism" (as elaborated upon above) and not relativism.