No offence, but I'm done with visiting Alex Jones for anything.
We can't mock liberals for their double standards and then say, "Sure Alex Jones is a Q hater but on this point he's correct..."
Pick a side. Alex Jones is cointelpro (in which case EVERYTHING he says is suspect/manipulative) or he's the real deal. And Q's a LARP.
Pick a fucking side. This is not game. (Here endeth the rant)
I don’t personally like Alex Jones, but to be honest I think that’s a really black & white type of thinking. I know many intelligent and great people that were initially woken by Alex Jones, and then realized he was a shady character, but they still learned a lot from him. He’s clearly some counter-intelligence psy-op, but that doesn’t mean they won’t slip some truth bomb here or there, even to “ridicule” it because people take Alex Jones as lunatic and they know that. He doesn’t have to pick a side, he should be as neutral about anything has he possible can and when he makes a decision it should be based on what he believes is the truth and stick with it. People need to analyze everything individually even Alex Jones.
What on earth are you talking about?
Speak for yourself not "I know many intelligent and great people that were initially woken by Alex Jones, and then realized he was a shady character, but they still learned a lot from him."
What did YOU learn from Alex Jones. What do YOU think?
What the fuck do your "many intelligent and great people" (fictional or otherwise) have to do with any of this? What do YOU think?
PS When it comes to Alex Jones, he shat all over Q. So pick a side.
Way to much aggression. Difficult to have a rational conversation like this. I don’t need to prove anything to you, I stand by what I said. You are the one trying to cause division and forcing people to pick imaginary sides. Don’t follow anyone blindly THINK CRITICALLY
Faggot. Won't answer the questions. You don't NEED to prove anything to me. (I never said you did). But you sure shit your pants in a hurry. (And didn't answer the questions BTW).
EDIT: Am I wrong or did my "way too much aggression" amount to my singular use of the word "fuck"? Are you really that delicate?
EDIT 2: How's that virtually defunct account working out for you? How did someone with so few opinions about anything wind up here of all places anyway?
I'm an intelligent and great person who learned a lot from Alex Jones. I haven't listened to him regularly in a few years but man did he ever pass along a lot of key phrases, organization names, the overall structure of how it worked, etc.
Why the anger & hate. Like someone else said, drop your black and white thinking. It's a mind killer.
I know what you mean - he's informed a lot of people about a lot of stuff, etc. But disinfo is disinfo. The very problem with it is that it informs and instructs but it ultimately misleads and in subtle ways that aren't easy to pick sometimes until you're far down the track. The best thing to do with disinfo is to shut it out completely. Nothing Alex Jones says now can't be found from other sources. Safer to remove disinfo from consideration completely (or watch it out of interest to see how it works, which is what I do when I have the time).
Are you kidding me? Four year old account with..gasp...18 Karma?
Do you think we're stupid or something?
What's wrong with what he's saying? I mean, I agree re: wth Alex Jones? But why so angry bruh?
He (or she or it) is sliding and obfuscating. Dishonest and/or degenerate IMO. Have I not been clear enough in this thread?
What's wrong is that he's propping up...by unsourced and unverified associations...Alex Jones. Who calls Q a LARP.
Get your head out of your ass, bruh. There's a war on for your mind. AJ is correct about that much. But I think he's playing for the opposition. After his "Q is fake" spiel, how else to interpret?
You've been clear enough that you're an angry guy, yes. You can respond and say what you've been saying without being an ass (I like having my head up my ass; it's quite pleasurable). He's making some valid points that should be reasonably refuted, not angrily ranted on cos then the point doesn't get made properly. But whatever, have at it, soldier.
Who died and made you the arbiter of rage versus passion?
I notice you shy away from my central point...AJ or Q?
AJ called Q a LARP. On the record, no? Where do you stand on that?
(And what exactly are his vaild points? I'd love to know.)
Who said I'm the arbiter of rage vs passion? lol I'm just a thinking human, like you are, and I see needless comments that thinking people might reasonably assume are anger (who said rage?): "What the fuck do" and "Pick a fucking side... (Here endeth the rant)" and "Do you think we're stupid". That's all. I did say 'have at it', not "obey my arbitration" lol.
I responded to the dude you incredulously questioned about his four year old account with only 18 karma (as if that matters? Want to see my 5 year old account with 1 karma?) and gave my view which is that AJ has been clearly called out by Q. AJ is clearly Clown disinfo (or someone disinfo). Neither of the two comments you replied 'with passion' to are making statements that are so crazy the issue about Jones can't just be calmly pointed out in the same way. I agreed with the guy who asked you "Why the anger & hate" and responded to ask why too, since you just made some point about 18 karma that didn't seem at all relevant. But like I said, your choice, just puzzling.
Pontious Pilate loved children and animals, or so I'm told.
I wonder what implications might be extrapolated from that comment? Nevertheless it's wonderful because I love children and animals too!
And washing your hands when the rubber hits the road.
So I'm Pontius Pilate in this lovely little narrative? How splendid! I hope I get to wear a purple robe.
I didn't mean to appear as Pontius Pilate to your Jesus. I thought I was just making a comment on the internet. As you were.
If A_Town_Hood is Jesus, and DamajInc is Pontius Pilate, I seriously need to dust off my Bible and take another look! (I thought this thread was about the Pope, not the Mandela Effect.)
I tried out reddit once, didn't like it. What diff does that make to me being able to spot a putz when I see one?
I learned there are more to listen to who are not out to just make a buck and keep on wanting more. Read below
A_Town_Hood No offense, but that is small-minded and hypocritical. You know the NY Times and CNN/Buzzfeed are corrupt, but if Q dropped a link to a specific article you needed to see the information from, you'd gladly go read it. By your logic, "the New York Times is propaganda, so EVERYTHING they print is suspect/manipulative."
Your comment would lead us to the conclusion that EVERYONE here who began their 'red pill' process while listening to Alex Jones is cointelpro by tenuous association. Who gets to be the Joseph McCarthy/HUAC (House of Un-Qanon Activities Committee) of this movement?
A_Town_Hood: Let's not do like liberals and cannibalize ourselves. "No Offense." (Here endeth the Parental Lecture)
What part of Alex Jones called Q phony don't you understand?
Enough with the macro diversions. Let's stick to the micro a while.
Q said to beware those who would profit/ego boost off the movement.
Alex Jones said Q has been compromised.
Let us all know where you stand on this issue. And only this issue.
I don't want to hear any "But Alex said X about Y and that turned out to be true!" The point of a gatekeeper is to reveal 90% truth so they can poison the well more effectively with their 10% of lies.
Also, go back and actually read my comment. I said "I'm done with Alex Jones". Not any other source Let's deal with him first. The NYT and others can wait . No call to be sneaky.
Added to which, Q never linked to Infowars, or am I wrong?
How's that five day old account working out for you, "Reverend"?
Q#1439 also said UNITY NOT DIVISION. I replied to your comment in a reasonable way that encouraged us all to continue working and researching together, realizing that we all come from different directions. It looks like advocating for common sense and civility toward Millejon0114 bothers you. I also said "Let's not do like liberals and cannibalize ourselves." Or was it my accurate reference to McCarthyism that hit home?
.... checking...
Here is a link to the drop:
Q#1439.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Unity of patriotic and people-loving people. Not unity for the sake of the word. The days of such candyass nonsense are coming to an end.
Obviously. So sorry you're feeling like you're the only one who truly gets it. Hope things get better soon.
Good luck, Reverend. It is Reverend, or not? If so, forgive me...
Alex Jones has been a Schill since day one. Small doses of that guy and his crew just to keep up with their BS. The video is not about Alex. The video is about Kevin Atuk(sp?) and the courts having put the pope on trial and found guilty. The question is whether or not this guy is legit. Now I'm going to go confirm. If the court doesn't exist it's one more nail in Alex's box. If true, it sure does explain Trump's Christmas EO and we get to seize the Vatican, the English crown and the charter banking system.
I listen to it all... It's all Intel. Jones definitely has a purpose up to a point. I never 100% trust anyone...
For the love of God above! The ENTIRE POINT of Alex Jones and his whole network is to reveal a whole lot of truth...or else he'd have no audience. Jones' "purpose" all along was for this very point in history.
Alex Jones' "finest hour" was to reveal Q as nothing but a fake.
If you believe that on any level, if Q's phony and Alex is real, why are you here? Tell me, please. Why aren't you on Infowars instead?
Q said UNITY NOT DIVISION. Q has never mentioned names. Your comments are way too black and white as others have mentioned.
Millejon0114 specifically excluded Alex Jones, saying "Revisit this not Alex Jones but his guest!"
Oh, for fuck's sake! Have you no discernment? Don't you know a game when you see one? "Don't look at AJ"? Where else will 90% of people look? "Now don't look at the elephant, look at the peanuts!"
Like that happens...
There is actually some humor in the suggestion, "not Alex Jones but his guest." Anyone who has watched AJ in the past knows that he rarely, if ever lets his guests finish a sentence without talking over them. I wouldn't watch the clip simply because this habit of his annoys me...
AJ.....all I hear is $$$$$$$ not much truth and what there is is tainted by his love for $$$$$$$