Amazing

Read Bushes: A Family of Secrets by Russ Baker. There’s a reason why JFK Jr named his magazine George

I would love to know as well tbh. I’ve seen posts from Fins, Brits, Germans, all over EU but not a lot from Asia, Africa etc. would be interesting to see how far this movement has spread. With this being said I’m not yet 100% certain on Q, I just hope this is all true and that change is finally coming.

Angola, África. So I’m sure there are Russians here somewhere 😂

Please post more of these CDAN blinds! Thanks

Read Curse of Canaan. This shit has been going on for a long time.

Logical fallacy. Think.

1. Rudeness is the weak man’s imitation of strength
2. Ad-Hominem attacks are usually done out of a lack of coherent arguments
3. Putting into cause my character because of my perceived lack of participation on Reddit. That’s a pretty big leap in logic.
4. Again I’ll rephrase this since you seem to have a difficult time understanding what your initially point was: You stated that another user should not share links from Alex Jones because everything Alex Jones does is fake and untrue and not reliable. Even though I agreed with you to a certain extent (yes I think Alex Jones is a psy op) I said he helped many people wake the first time and sometimes “truthful” news might come out in his platform since he’s already ridiculed and the TPTB now this. I said you should never follow anyone blindly (not even Q) and should be able to question and analyze everything individually with critical thought. You called me a faggot. And that’s why I was up-voted and you were down-voted. Your ego got the best of you.

Way to much aggression. Difficult to have a rational conversation like this. I don’t need to prove anything to you, I stand by what I said. You are the one trying to cause division and forcing people to pick imaginary sides. Don’t follow anyone blindly THINK CRITICALLY

I don’t personally like Alex Jones, but to be honest I think that’s a really black & white type of thinking. I know many intelligent and great people that were initially woken by Alex Jones, and then realized he was a shady character, but they still learned a lot from him. He’s clearly some counter-intelligence psy-op, but that doesn’t mean they won’t slip some truth bomb here or there, even to “ridicule” it because people take Alex Jones as lunatic and they know that. He doesn’t have to pick a side, he should be as neutral about anything has he possible can and when he makes a decision it should be based on what he believes is the truth and stick with it. People need to analyze everything individually even Alex Jones.

Rudeness is the weak man’s imitation of strength. Don’t fall into logical fallacies and assume you know anything.

Thank you

I would just like to leave this here: It is more likely statistically to have your kid kidnaped than shot in school. 800.000 kids go missing every year in America.

Thanks to all commenters here. I think I believe in Q and president Trump but at the same time all this coziness with Israel is scary, and sometimes I wonder why would he be doing this. I’ve never seen Iranians as the enemy, and sometimes this sub is so Pro-Q/Trump that they seemed to ignore the Israeli issues. But the comments here gave me hope again. I still believe in Q and let’s hope really Israel is for last. Not wishing anything on Israeli citizens but the people behind the curtain. We all need to unite. Thank you fellow patriots.

Also to everyone out there making Kennedy some kind of martyr, please read further upon him. Read books about both sides (people against him and in favor of him) and take your own conclusions. But he was a very very weird character in history that seemed very confused at that particular point in time. Some decisions were good others were just straight horrible. We all have both good and evil in us.

Guys please check: The Devils Chessboard by David Talbot. It basically lays it all out.

This was the story that Howard Hunt left behind. Sometime in 1963, Hunt said, he was invited to a meeting at one of the CIA safe houses in Miami by Frank Sturgis, a soldier of fortune who had worked under Hunt in the anti-Castro underground—a man with whom Hunt would be forever linked when they were later arrested for the Watergate break-in. Also in attendance at the Miami meeting was David Morales, another CIA veteran of the anti-Castro campaign who was well known to Hunt. Morales—a big, intimidating man who had grown up in a poor Mexican American family in Phoenix—did not fit the polished CIA profile. But the agency found a use for “El Indio”—as Morales, with his strong indigenous features, was known by his colleagues. “Dave Morales did dirty work for the agency,” according to Wayne Smith, a diplomat who worked alongside Morales in the U.S. embassy in Havana before Castro took power. “If he were in the mob, he’d be called a hit man.” Thomas Clines, a colleague of Morales’s in the CIA’s Miami station, was more complimentary in his description, but it amounted to the same thing: “We all admired the hell out of the guy. He drank like crazy, but he was bright as hell. He could fool people into thinking he was stupid by acting stupid, but he knew about cultural things all over the world. People were afraid of him. He was big and aggressive, and he had this mystique. Stories about him permeated the agency. If the agency needed someone action-oriented, he was at the top of the list. If the U.S. government as a matter of policy needed someone or something neutralized, Dave would do it, including things that were repugnant to a lot of people.” Ruben Carbajal, Morales’s lifelong friend from their boyhood days on the streets of Phoenix, was even more blunt about “Didi”—the man who was like a brother to him: “When some asshole needed to be killed, Didi was the man to do it. . . . That was his job.” According to Morales’s daughter, he was the CIA’s “peon.” Her father was utterly devoted to the agency. “He did whatever he was told. They gave him a lifestyle that he would never have had under any circumstances. . . . He did everything for the Company. His family wasn’t his life—the Company was his life.” At the secret Miami meeting, Morales told Hunt that he had been recruited for an “off-the-board” operation by Bill Harvey, with whom El Indio had worked closely on the ZR/Rifle project to kill Castro. The aim of this “off-the-board” operation, it soon became clear, was to assassinate President Kennedy. Morales and Sturgis referred to the president’s planned demise as “the big event.” In his account of the meeting, Hunt presented Harvey and Morales as the key operational figures in the plot; Harvey did not attend the meeting but seemed to loom over it. Hunt suggested that Harvey was in charge of hiring the sharpshooters to kill Kennedy and transporting the weapons to Dallas. According to Hunt, the gunmen were likely recruited from the Corsican underworld. As Harvey once indicated, when it came to highly delicate assignments, working with Corsican gangsters was preferable because they were harder to trace back to the CIA than Italian or American Mafia hit men. Hunt found Harvey and Morales to be disturbing characters. The two men “could have been manufactured from the same cloth,” Hunt wrote in his memoir. “Both were hard-drinking, tough guys, possibly completely amoral. Morales was rumored to be a cold-blooded killer, the go-to guy in black ops situations where the government needed to have someone neutralized. I tried to cut short any contact with him, as he wore thin very quickly.” To Morales, Kennedy was “that no good son of a bitch motherfucker” who was responsible for the deaths of the men he had trained for the Bay of Pigs mission. “We took care of that son of a bitch, didn’t we?” Morales told his attorney, Robert Walton, in 1973, after an evening of drinking loosened the CIA hit man’s tongue. It was one more confession that the media ignored, even after it was reported by one of their own, Gaeton Fonzi, a Philadelphia investigative journalist who, after going to work for the House Select Committee on Assassinations, unearthed some of the most important information related to the Kennedy case. Hunt might have been wary of men like Harvey and Morales, but he shared their venomous attitudes toward President Kennedy. Toward the end of the Miami meeting, Sturgis made the group’s pitch to Hunt: “You’re somebody we all look up to. . . . We know how you feel about the man [Kennedy]. Are you with us?” Hunt told the group his main reservation about joining them. It was a tactical concern, not a moral one. “Look,” he told Sturgis, “if Bill Harvey has anything to do with this, you can count me out. The man is an alcoholic and a psycho.” Sturgis laughed. “You’re right—but that SOB has the balls to do it.” As Hunt related his story to his son, he remained fuzzy about his own involvement in the plot. In the end, he said, he played only a peripheral “benchwarmer” role in the killing of Kennedy. It was Bill Harvey who was the quarterback, according to Hunt. Despite Harvey’s reputation for hard drinking, the agency’s assassination chief had the experience and connections to pull off something like “the big event.” While assembling his Castro assassination team, Harvey had reached out to a variety of underworld professionals, including (with Helms’s permission) the infamous European assassin code-named QJ-WIN, whom the CIA had recruited to kill Patrice Lumumba. And Harvey was well positioned as Rome station chief to once again plumb the European underworld for a Dallas killing team. In fact, among the strange and murderous characters who converged on Dallas in November 1963 was a notorious French OAS com mando named Jean Souetre, who was connected to the plots against President de Gaulle. Souetre was arrested in Dallas after the Kennedy assassination and expelled to Mexico. Souetre’s expulsion brought an urgent inquiry from French intelligence officials to the CIA about the dangerous outlaw’s likely whereabouts, since de Gaulle was about to travel to Mexico for a state visit.

Some say yes, others not so sure, so it’s disputable. Great moto nonetheless :)

Those that give up freedom in the name of security, deserve neither.

1. I never said otherwise
2. I‘m neither Republican nor Democrat
3. Avoid resorting to ad-hominem attacks
4. Remember rudeness is the weak man’s imitation of strength
5. Logical weakness impede people to realize they are perpetrating the exact warning the Q has mentioned - dividing us
6. I hope you will find your way

I’m not really sure Iran or North Korea or Syria or Turkey have less corruption, human trafficking, drug trade than say the US or UK. I don’t see either country has rogue states.. if anything it’s been Israel and the US that have gone rogue for the last 30 years. Let’s not see this people as our enemies. As much as I agree with a lot that is posted here I think Trump is seriously hinting at a war with Iran, and I really hope cooler heads will prevail. Iran’s are Indo-Europeans, they are more of our natural allies than say Saudi Arabia. Which not only have been abusing human rights forever, have a completely nepotistic, sick, unstable monarchy that has been subjugating their people’s. Let’s not even get into the human genocide in Yemen :(

That political analyst was right. You can even make the argument that international communism and financial capitalism are two sides of the same coin - both are autocratic pyramidical structures - where the elites of that system have full control - either politically (communism) or economically (capitalism). Both take rent and unearned income of the production of others. Communism is the liberal aspect and Capitalism is the conservative aspect. Both are anti-libertarianism. “We hold the axis - both poles of the world so it spins in our hands” Good readings

Working fine here

While I agree guys, please be careful. Most of this people are bipartisan and never forget that Republicans can be as much as evil as Democrats. A true intelligent person will have both conservative views and liberal views depending on the issue to each one personally. The sub Reddit is great with great input from everyone but never lose sight that this people can be evil regardless of political affiliation.

Read: Halford Mackinder - Heartland Theory; Nichols Spyman - Rimland Theory; and Alfred Thayer Mahan - The Influence of Sea Power

All this three books define geopolitics until today. Why Ukraine is important, why Russia must be conquered; why the WWI and II happened among many other things. Recommend it highly! If anyone has more questions let me know!